RESUMO
PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to compare magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) and video capsule endoscopy (VCE) in suspected small bowel disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nineteen patients with suspected small bowel disease participated in a prospective clinical comparison of MRE versus VCE. Both methods were evaluated separately and in conjunction with respect to a combined diagnostic endpoint based on clinical, laboratory, surgical, and histopathological findings. The Fisher's exact and j tests were used in comparing MRE and VCE. RESULTS: Small bowel pathologies were found in 15 out of 19 patients: Crohn's disease (n= 5), lymphoma (n= 4), lymphangioma (n= 1), adenocarcinoma (n= 1), postradiation enteropathy (n= 1), NSAID-induced enteropathy (n =1), angiodysplasia (n= 1), and small bowel adhesions (n= 1). VCE and MRE separately and in conjunction showed sensitivities of 92.9, 71.4, and 100% and specificities of 80, 60, and 80% (kappa= 0.73 vs. kappa = 0.29; P= 0.31/kappa = 0.85), respectively. In four patients, VCE depicted mucosal pathologies missed by MRE. MRE revealed 19 extraenteric findings in 11 patients as well as small bowel adhesions not detected on VCE (n= 1). CONCLUSION: VCE can readily depict and characterize subtle mucosal lesions missed at MRE, whereas MRE yields additional mural, perienteric, and extraenteric information. Thus, VCE and MRE appear to be complementary methods which, when used in conjunction, may better characterize suspected small bowel disease.
Assuntos
Endoscopia por Cápsula , Enteropatias/diagnóstico , Intestino Delgado , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos ProspectivosAssuntos
Angiografia/métodos , Artérias Carótidas/patologia , Meios de Contraste/farmacologia , Gadolínio DTPA/administração & dosagem , Aumento da Imagem/métodos , Angiografia por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Artefatos , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Humanos , Processamento de Imagem Assistida por Computador/métodos , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Valores de Referência , Reprodutibilidade dos TestesAssuntos
Aspergilose/diagnóstico por imagem , Leucemia Linfocítica Crônica de Células B/diagnóstico por imagem , Pneumopatias Fúngicas/diagnóstico por imagem , Infecções Oportunistas/diagnóstico por imagem , Nódulo Pulmonar Solitário/diagnóstico por imagem , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-IdadeRESUMO
The aim of this study was to assess costs and safety of immediate femoral sheath removal and closure with a suture-mediated closure device (Perclose, Menlo Park, CA) in patients undergoing elective (PCI). A total of 193 patients was prospectively randomized to immediate arterial sheath removal and access site closure with a suture-mediated closure device (SMC; n = 96) or sheath removal 4 hr after PCI followed by manual compression (MC; n = 97). In the SMC group, patients were ambulated 4 hr after elective PCI if hemostasis was achieved. In the MC group, patients were ambulated the day after the procedure. In addition to safety, total direct costs including physician and nursing time, infrastructure, and the device were assessed in both groups. Total direct costs were significantly (all P < 0.001) lower in the SMC group. Successful hemostasis without major complication was achieved in all patients. The time to achieve hemostasis was significantly shorter in the SMC group (7.1 +/- 3.4 vs. 22.9 +/- 14.0 min; P < 0.01) and 85% of SMC patients were ambulated on the day of intervention. Suture-mediated closure allows a reduction in hospitalization time, leading to significant cost savings due to decreased personnel and infrastructural demands. In addition, the use of SMC is safe and convenient to the patients.
