Postoperative Complications and Reoperative Surgery in the Treatment of Patients With Zenker Diverticulum.

Importance: The association of the surgical approach, surgical specialty, and other factors with the outcomes of surgical treatment of Zenker diverticulum (ZD) have been debated in the literature. Objectives: To explore the outcomes of 3 different surgical methods used in the management of ZD and determine the associations between patient characteristics, such as preoperative comorbidities and treatment outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective, population-based cohort study examined patient records of patients who underwent surgical treatment for ZD from the Care Register for Healthcare database in Finland between January 1996 and December 2015. Data review and analysis were completed in 2021. Exposure: Surgical treatment for ZD. Main Outcome and Measures: Complications of surgical procedures used in the management of ZD. Results: In this study, 1044 patients (median [IQR] age, 70.0 [22.0-98.0] years; 416 female individuals [39.8%]) surgically treated for ZD were identified. Most patients (606 [58.0%]) had no preoperative comorbidities. A total of 67 (6.4%) complications were recorded, with a mortality rate of 0.9%. The likelihood of complications was associated with patient age (t [1042] = 2.28; Cohen d, 0.29; 95%, CI 0.04, 0.54), surgical approach (Cramer V = 0.14 [95% CI 0.07-0.21]), and surgical specialty (Cramer V, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.06-0.28). The median (IQR) length of stay in association with the primary surgical intervention was 3.0 (0-85.0) days. Length of stay was associated with patient age (Cramer V, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.06-0.25), especially in patients older than 90 years, surgical approach (F [2, 466.2] = 26.9; ηp2 = 0.08; 95% CI, 0.05-0.11), and surgical specialty (F [4, 22.1] = 11.0; ηp2 = 0.07; 95% CI, 0.04-0.10). Reoperation was associated with the initial surgical approach (Cramer V, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.12-0.23) and surgical specialty (Cramer V, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.09-0.21). Conclusions and Relevance: The results of this cohort study suggest that the outcomes of surgical management depended on the surgical approach, surgical specialty, and patient age. Overall, surgical treatment may be considered safe and may be considered for all patients with symptomatic ZD.

Epidemiology and Management of Zenker Diverticulum in a Low-Threshold Single-payer Health Care System.

IMPORTANCE: The incidence of Zenker diverticulum has been established; previous estimates have been extrapolated from small institutional cohorts. OBJECTIVE: To describe the population-wide incidence of Zenker diverticulum over a 20-year period and characterize management strategies across specialties and treatment settings. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective national cohort study was conducted from January 1, 1996, through December 31, 2015, and reviewed patient records from the Care Register for Healthcare in Finland, from which patients with Zenker diverticulum were identified. The data were analyzed in October 2021. EXPOSURES: Zenker diverticulum. MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURE: The incidence of Zenker diverticulum per 100 000 person-years. RESULTS: A total of 2736 patients (median [IQR] age at diagnosis 72.0 [19-106] years; 1278 women [46.7%]) were identified, making the annual incidence of Zenker diverticulum in Finland 2.9/100 000 person-years. Men had higher incidence (3.7/100 000 person-years) compared with women (2.3/100 000 person-years), with an incidence rate ratio of 1.61 (95% CI, 1.48-1.76; P < .001). Within the study population, 1044 patients (38.2%) underwent surgical treatment and 227 (8.3%) underwent 2 or more surgeries. The choice of initial operative approach depended on the medical specialty (Cramer V = 0.41) and on specific catchment area (Cramer V = 0.41). Overall, endoscopic approaches for initial operations were most popular. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The cohort study results found that the incidence of Zenker diverticulum was 2.9/100 000 person-years. Most patients with Zenker diverticulum did not undergo definitive therapy. Some hospital districts and some medical specialties were more likely to opt for conservative treatment than others. The choice of operative approach depended more on physician-level factors rather than patient profiles.