Effect of Human Head Shape on the Risk of Traumatic Brain Injury: A Gaussian Process Regression-based Machine Learning Approach.

INTRODUCTION: Computational head injury models are promising tools for understanding and predicting traumatic brain injuries. However, most available head injury models are "average" models that employ a single set of head geometry (e.g., 50th-percentile U.S. male) without considering variability in these parameters across the human population. A significant variability of head shapes exists in U.S. Army soldiers, evident from the Anthropometric Survey of U.S. Army Personnel (ANSUR II). The objective of this study is to elucidate the effects of head shape on the predicted risk of traumatic brain injury from computational head injury models. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Magnetic resonance imaging scans of 25 human subjects are collected. These images are registered to the standard MNI152 brain atlas, and the resulting transformation matrix components (called head shape parameters) are used to quantify head shapes of the subjects. A generative machine learning model is used to generate 25 additional head shape parameter datasets to augment our database. Head injury models are developed for these head shapes, and a rapid injurious head rotation event is simulated to obtain several brain injury predictor variables (BIPVs): Peak cumulative maximum principal strain (CMPS), average CMPS, and the volume fraction of brain exceeding an injurious CMPS threshold. A Gaussian process regression model is trained between head shape parameters and BIPVs, which is then used to study the relative sensitivity of the various BIPVs on individual head shape parameters. We distinguish head shape parameters into 2 types: Scaling components ${T_{xx}}$, ${T_{yy}}$, and ${T_{zz}}$ that capture the breadth, length, and height of the head, respectively, and shearing components (${T_{xy}},{T_{xz}},{T_{yx}},{T_{yz}},{T_{zx}}$, and ${T_{zy}}$) that capture the relative skewness of the head shape. RESULTS: An overall positive correlation is evident between scaling components and BIPVs. Notably, a very high, positive correlation is seen between the BIPVs and the head volume. As an example, a 57% increase in peak CMPS was noted between the smallest and the largest investigated head volume parameters. The variation in shearing components ${T_{xy}},{T_{xz}},{T_{yx}},{T_{yz}},{T_{zx}}$, and ${T_{zy}}$ on average does not cause notable changes in the BIPVs. From the Gaussian process regression model, all 3 BIPVs showed an increasing trend with each of the 3 scaling components, but the BIPVs are found to be most sensitive to the height dimension of the head. From the Sobol sensitivity analysis, the ${T_{zz}}$ scaling parameter contributes nearly 60% to the total variance in peak and average CMPS; ${T_{yy}}$ contributes approximately 20%, whereas ${T_{xx}}$ contributes less than 5%. The remaining contribution is from the 6 shearing components. Unlike peak and average CMPS, the VF-CMPS BIPV is associated with relatively evenly distributed Sobol indices across the 3 scaling parameters. Furthermore, the contribution of shearing components on the total variance in this case is negligible. CONCLUSIONS: Head shape has a considerable influence on the injury predictions of computational head injury models. Available "average" head injury models based on a 50th-percentile U.S. male are likely associated with considerable uncertainty. In general, larger head sizes correspond to greater BIPV magnitudes, which point to potentially a greater injury risk under rapid neck rotation for people with larger heads.

Data-driven Uncertainty Quantification in Computational Human Head Models.

Computational models of the human head are promising tools for estimating the impact-induced response of the brain, and thus play an important role in the prediction of traumatic brain injury. The basic constituents of these models (i.e., model geometry, material properties, and boundary conditions) are often associated with significant uncertainty and variability. As a result, uncertainty quantification (UQ), which involves quantification of the effect of this uncertainty and variability on the simulated response, becomes critical to ensure reliability of model predictions. Modern biofidelic head model simulations are associated with very high computational cost and high-dimensional inputs and outputs, which limits the applicability of traditional UQ methods on these systems. In this study, a two-stage, data-driven manifold learning-based framework is proposed for UQ of computational head models. This framework is demonstrated on a 2D subject-specific head model, where the goal is to quantify uncertainty in the simulated strain fields (i.e., output), given variability in the material properties of different brain substructures (i.e., input). In the first stage, a data-driven method based on multi-dimensional Gaussian kernel-density estimation and diffusion maps is used to generate realizations of the input random vector directly from the available data. Computational simulations of a small number of realizations provide input-output pairs for training data-driven surrogate models in the second stage. The surrogate models employ nonlinear dimensionality reduction using Grassmannian diffusion maps, Gaussian process regression to create a low-cost mapping between the input random vector and the reduced solution space, and geometric harmonics models for mapping between the reduced space and the Grassmann manifold. It is demonstrated that the surrogate models provide highly accurate approximations of the computational model while significantly reducing the computational cost. Monte Carlo simulations of the surrogate models are used for uncertainty propagation. UQ of the strain fields highlights significant spatial variation in model uncertainty, and reveals key differences in uncertainty among commonly used strain-based brain injury predictor variables.

MR Imaging of Human Brain Mechanics In Vivo: New Measurements to Facilitate the Development of Computational Models of Brain Injury.

Computational models of the brain and its biomechanical response to skull accelerations are important tools for understanding and predicting traumatic brain injuries (TBIs). However, most models have been developed using experimental data collected on animal models and cadaveric specimens, both of which differ from the living human brain. Here we describe efforts to noninvasively measure the biomechanical response of the human brain with MRI-at non-injurious strain levels-and generate data that can be used to develop, calibrate, and evaluate computational brain biomechanics models. Specifically, this paper reports on a project supported by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke to comprehensively image brain anatomy and geometry, mechanical properties, and brain deformations that arise from impulsive and harmonic skull loadings. The outcome of this work will be a publicly available dataset ( http://www.nitrc.org/projects/bbir ) that includes measurements on both males and females across an age range from adolescence to older adulthood. This article describes the rationale and approach for this study, the data available, and how these data may be used to develop new computational models and augment existing approaches; it will serve as a reference to researchers interested in using these data.

Integrating material properties from magnetic resonance elastography into subject-specific computational models for the human brain.

Advances in brain imaging and computational methods have facilitated the creation of subject-specific computational brain models that aid researchers in investigating brain trauma using simulated impacts. The emergence of magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) as a non-invasive mechanical neuroimaging tool has enabled in vivo estimation of material properties at low-strain, harmonic loading. An open question in the field has been how this data can be integrated into computational models. The goals of this study were to use a novel MRI dataset acquired in human volunteers to generate models with subject-specific anatomy and material properties, and then to compare simulated brain deformations to subject-specific brain deformation data under non-injurious loading. Models of five subjects were simulated with linear viscoelastic (LVE) material properties estimated directly from MRE data. Model predictions were compared to experimental brain deformation acquired in the same subjects using tagged MRI. Outcomes from the models matched the spatial distribution and magnitude of the measured peak strain components as well as the 95th percentile in-plane peak strains within 0.005 mm/mm and maximum principal strain within 0.012 mm/mm. Sensitivity to material heterogeneity was also investigated. Simulated brain deformations from a model with homogenous brain properties and a model with brain properties discretized with up to ten regions were very similar (a mean absolute difference less than 0.0015 mm/mm in peak strains). Incorporating material properties directly from MRE into a biofidelic subject-specific model is an important step toward future investigations of higher-order model features and simulations under more severe loading conditions.