Evaluating the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Late-Canceled and No-Show Appointments at the Department of Neurological Surgery.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic resulted in unprecedented restrictions on the general public and disturbances to the routines of hospitals worldwide. These restrictions are now being relaxed as the number of vaccinated individuals increases and as the rates of incidence and prevalence decrease; however, they left a lasting impact on healthcare systems that is still being felt today. This retrospective study evaluated the total number of canceled or missed outpatient clinic appointments in a Neurological Surgery department before and after peak COVID-19 restrictions and attempted to assess the impact of these disruptions on neurosurgical clinical attendance. We also attempted to compare our data with the data from another surgical subspecialty department. We evaluated 32,558 scheduled appointments at the Loyola University Medical Center Department of Neurological Surgery, as well as 139,435 scheduled appointments with the Department of Otolaryngology. Appointments before April 2020 were defined as pre-COVID, while appointments during or after April 2020 were defined as post-COVID. Here, we compare no-show and non-attendance rates (no-shows plus late-canceled appointments) within the respective time range. Overall, we observed that before COVID-19 restrictions were put into place, there was an 8.9% no-show rate and a 17.4% non-attendance rate for the Department of Neurological Surgery. After COVID restrictions were implemented, these increased to 10.9% and 18.3%, respectively. Greater no-show and cancellation rates (9.8% in the post-COVID era vs 8.0% in the pre-COVID era) were associated with varying socioeconomic and racial demographics. African-American patients (2.56 times higher), new-visit patients (1.67 times higher), and those with Medicaid/Medicare insurance policies (1.48 times higher) were at the highest risk of no-show in the post-COVID era compared to the pre-COVID era.

Rathke's cleft cyst marsupialization and repair with a free mucosal graft - Video case report and literature review.

Rathke's cleft cysts (RCCs) are sellar or suprasellar cystic lesions arising from the remnants of the embryological Rathke's pouch. When symptomatic, RCCs are usually treated surgically via marsupialization. Free mucosal graft (FMG) repair has shown promise in decreasing recurrence versus marsupialization alone. The authors present a case report with operative video of a patient with visual and endocrinological symptoms with a RCC treated with FMG following marsupialization. A search of the PubMed database from July 1997 through April 2022 was conducted using the terms 'Rathke's cleft cyst', 'Rathke's cleft cyst management', 'Rathke's cleft cyst repair', 'mucosal graft', 'mucosal coupling', 'transsphenoidal', and 'endoscopic endonasal'. Clinical and pathological aspects of the case presented were compared with information obtained from literature review. A 25-year-old female presented with a six-year history of amenorrhea, one-year history of anemia, headaches, and progressive visual loss. Imaging revealed an RCC. The patient underwent surgical treatment via an endoscopic endonasal approach. Marsupialization was achieved with placement of an FMG to help prevent restenosis. Post-operative examination revealed that the patient's OD vision returned to normal, although her OS vision was only slightly improved. Our review of the English literature resulted in 35 full-length articles that were published between 1997 and 2022. The literature suggests that FMG prevents scar formation by allowing for adequate epithelialization, thus decreasing the recurrence rate and being well tolerated by patients. Our findings support the utility of the FMG as a superior surgical treatment option for RCC management.

Treatment of tegmen dehiscence using a middle fossa approach and autologous temporalis fascia graft: Outcomes from a single center.

INTRODUCTION: Although bony defects of the tegmen surface are relatively common, the majority of dehiscences are asymptomatic. For those who experience symptoms, there is a wide spectrum of relatively benign manifestations such as hearing loss and otorrhea to potentially more serious but rare sequelae such as epilepsy and meningitis. Surgical management of tegmen dehiscences (TDs) can help prevent these symptoms. In this manuscript, we present one of the largest reported single team experiences of using a temporal craniotomy with middle cranial fossa approach and temporalis fascia graft in the treatment of tegmen defects. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed every case of a TD surgically repaired by the same neurosurgeon/otolaryngologist team at Loyola University Medical Center from May 2015 to January 2022. In our chart review, we identified 44 patients with 48 cases of tegmen defect repair. We analyzed patient characteristics, operative details, and postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: 44 patients met inclusion criteria for the presence of TD (mean age 55 years, 55% male, and average body mass index 35.6). 89% of these patients had no clear etiology for the dehiscence. Commonly reported symptoms were hearing loss (89%) and CSF otorrhea (82%). The least reported presenting signs and symptoms were seizures (5%) and meningitis (2%). Most defects were repaired with both temporalis fascial and calvarial bone grafts (63%), while a minority were treated with temporalis fascia only (33%), temporalis fascia with muscle (2%), or fascia lata (2%). Every patient in our sample experienced resolution of CSF otorrhea after tegmen repair and 81% of the sample reported subjective hearing improvements after surgery. 6% of our sample had post-operative infections and 8% of patients underwent repeat unilateral surgery for a surgical complication. CONCLUSION: Craniotomy for middle fossa approach using autologous temporalis fascial grafts is a safe and effective method for the treatment of TD. These procedures should be performed by experienced and multidisciplinary teams.