Modelling atopic dermatitis in healthy human skin for the characterization of topical compounds.

Suitable human models for the development and characterization of topical compounds for inflammatory skin diseases such as atopic dermatitis are not readily available to date. We describe here the development of a translational model involving healthy human skin mimicking major aspects of AD and its application for the characterization of topical Janus kinase inhibitors. Full thickness human abdominal skin obtained from plastic surgery stimulated in vitro with IL4 and IL13 shows molecular features of AD. This is evidenced by STAT6 phosphorylation assessed by immunohistochemistry and analysis of skin lysates. Broad transcriptome changes assessed by AmpliSeq followed by gene set variation analysis showed a consistent upregulation of gene signatures characterizing AD in this model. Topical application of experimental formulations of compounds targeting the JAK pathway to full thickness skin normalizes the molecular features of AD induced by IL4 and IL13 stimulation. The inhibitory effects of topical JAK inhibitors on molecular features of AD are supported by pharmacokinetic analysis. The model described here is suited for the characterization of topical compounds for AD and has the potential to be extended to other inflammatory skin diseases and pathophysiological pathways.

Central Versus Peripheral Drug Exposure Ratio, a Key Differentiator for Siponimod Over Fingolimod?

INTRODUCTION: Siponimod, a potent and selective sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P1,5) agonist, is the only therapeutic agent that has shown efficacy against disability progression, decline in cognitive processing speed, total brain volume loss, gray matter atrophy and signs of demyelination in patients with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS). Although the pathophysiology of progression in SPMS and primary progressive MS (PPMS) is thought to be similar, fingolimod, the prototype S1P1,3,45 agonist, failed to show efficacy against disability progression in PPMS. Differentiating siponimod from fingolimod at the level of their central effects is believed to be the key to a better understanding of the underlying characteristics that could make siponimod uniquely efficacious in progressive MS (PMS). METHODS: Here, we compared the central vs. peripheral dose-dependent drug exposures for siponimod and fingolimod in healthy mice and mice with experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE). RESULTS: Siponimod treatment achieved dose-dependent efficacy and dose-proportional increases in steady-state drug blood levels, with a central nervous system (CNS)/blood drug-exposure ratio (CNS/bloodDER) of ~ 6 in both healthy and EAE mice. In contrast, fingolimod treatments achieved dose-proportional increases in fingolimod and fingolimod-phosphate blood levels, with respective CNS/bloodDER that were markedly increased (≥ threefold) in EAE vs. healthy mice. CONCLUSION: If proven to have translational value, these observations would suggest that CNS/bloodDER may be a key differentiator for siponimod over fingolimod for clinical efficacy in PMS.

Adriforant is a functional antagonist of histamine receptor 4 and attenuates itch and skin inflammation in mice.

BACKGROUND: Histamine has been postulated to play a role in atopic dermatitis via histamine receptor 4, mediating pruritic and inflammatory effects. The H4R antagonist adriforant (PF-3893787 or ZPL389) indicated clinical efficacy in a Ph2a study in atopic dermatitis. Preclinical investigations of adriforant had been scarce as experiments in transfectants with H4R from several species suggested partial agonism, not seen in human cells. OBJECTIVE: During the Ph2b trial in AD, we performed experiments to understand the pharmacology of adriforant in primary murine cells and in vivo models. We assessed its effects on ERK phosphorylation and transcriptional changes in bone marrow-derived mast cells, histamine-dependent Ca2+ flux in neurons and histamine-induced itch response. In addition, its impact on MC903-induced skin inflammation was evaluated. RESULTS: We show that, contrary to transfectants, adriforant is a competitive antagonist of the murine histamine receptor 4, antagonizes histamine-induced ERK phosphorylation, normalizes histamine-induced transcriptional changes in mast cells and reduces histamine-dependent Ca2+ flux in neurons. Administration to mice reduces acute histamine-induced itch response. In addition, adriforant ameliorates inflammation in the mouse MC903 model. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that functional inhibition of histamine receptor 4 by adriforant reduces itch and inflammation in vivo. The effects observed in mice, however, did not translate to clinical efficacy in patients as the Ph2b clinical trial with adriforant did not meet pre-specified efficacy endpoints. Given the complex pathogenesis of AD, antagonism of histamine receptor 4 alone appears insufficient to reduce disease severity in AD patients, despite the effects seen in mouse models.