Stromal, rather than epithelial cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) expression is associated with overall survival of breast cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Prognostic value of enhanced COX-2 expression in breast cancer has been controversial for a long time. The opinions vary widely between studies. Moreover, significant majority of studies considered only COX-2 expression in cancer epithelial cells. METHODS: We examined the prognostic value of COX-2 expression in both epithelial and stromal cells using three different antibodies and three algorithms of immunohistochemical scoring and categorizing the tumours into COX-2 overexpressing groups. RESULTS: Our results demonstrate that COX-2 expression in stromal cells is independent prognostic factor indicating worse overall survival of patients. Such a result was obtained using each of the three antibodies and two of the algorithms used for evaluations of COX-2 expression levels. We also show that immunohistochemical assessment of the prognostic value of COX-2 expression in cancer epithelial cells depends to a large extent on a combination of primary antibodies and algorithms used for determination of the COX-2 over-expressing tumours. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that stromal expression of COX-2 is independent prognostic parameter relatively insensitive to variations in sensitivity of antibodies used for its determination. Wide scatter of the published results concerning prognostic value of COX-2 expression in breast cancer tissues seems to be due to a large extent to multitude of antibodies and scoring algorithms used by different groups.

Different detectability of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) protein in standard paraffin sections and tissue microarrays of human melanomas and naevi - comparative study.

Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), overexpressed in many types of human cancer, may be a valuable marker for human melanoma. However, there are discrepancies between expression levels detected by different groups. The majority of the studies were carried out using standard paraffin sections. Tissue microarrays (TMAs) might enable analysis of COX-2 expression in numerous lesions. Our study assesses to what extent reprocessing of tissue samples used for preparing TMAs may influence reproducibility of data obtained for standard sections. The study included TMAs and standard histopathologic sections. COX-2 was detected by immunohistochemistry with two primary antibodies targeting different epitopes. COX-2 expression levels detected with both antibodies in standard sections were similar as in our previous study. Surprisingly, results obtained in TMAs were significantly different. While one of the antibodies yielded for TMAs results similar to standard sections, COX-2 expression levels found with the second antibody were very low and expression patterns strikingly different from those observed for standard sections and for both TMAs studied with the first antibody. Good performance of the antibodies found in standard sections of human skin and melanocytic lesions does not guarantee similar results in TMAs. The finding discloses a new aspect of immunohistochemical assays involving TMAs.