Correction: SARS-CoV-2 suppresses IFNß production mediated by NSP1, 5, 6, 15, ORF6 and ORF7b but does not suppress the effects of added interferon.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1009800.].

SARS-CoV-2 suppresses IFNß production mediated by NSP1, 5, 6, 15, ORF6 and ORF7b but does not suppress the effects of added interferon.

Type I Interferons (IFN-Is) are a family of cytokines which play a major role in inhibiting viral infection. Resultantly, many viruses have evolved mechanisms in which to evade the IFN-I response. Here we tested the impact of expression of 27 different SARS-CoV-2 genes in relation to their effect on IFN production and activity using three independent experimental methods. We identified six gene products; NSP6, ORF6, ORF7b, NSP1, NSP5 and NSP15, which strongly (>10-fold) blocked MAVS-induced (but not TRIF-induced) IFNß production. Expression of the first three of these SARS-CoV-2 genes specifically blocked MAVS-induced IFNß-promoter activity, whereas all six genes induced a collapse in IFNß mRNA levels, corresponding with suppressed IFNß protein secretion. Five of these six genes furthermore suppressed MAVS-induced activation of IFNλs, however with no effect on IFNα or IFNγ production. In sharp contrast, SARS-CoV-2 infected cells remained extremely sensitive to anti-viral activity exerted by added IFN-Is. None of the SARS-CoV-2 genes were able to block IFN-I signaling, as demonstrated by robust activation of Interferon Stimulated Genes (ISGs) by added interferon. This, despite the reduced levels of STAT1 and phospho-STAT1, was likely caused by broad translation inhibition mediated by NSP1. Finally, we found that a truncated ORF7b variant that has arisen from a mutant SARS-CoV-2 strain harboring a 382-nucleotide deletion associating with mild disease (Δ382 strain identified in Singapore & Taiwan in 2020) lost its ability to suppress type I and type III IFN production. In summary, our findings support a multi-gene process in which SARS-CoV-2 blocks IFN-production, with ORF7b as a major player, presumably facilitating evasion of host detection during early infection. However, SARS-CoV-2 fails to suppress IFN-I signaling thus providing an opportunity to exploit IFN-Is as potential therapeutic antiviral drugs.

CRISPR/Cas9-based Knockout Strategy Elucidates Components Essential for Type 1 Interferon Signaling in Human HeLa Cells.

Type I interferons (IFNs) have a central role in innate and adaptive immunities, proliferation, and cancer surveillance. How IFN binding to its specific receptor, the IFN α and ß receptor (IFNAR), can drive such variety of processes is an open question. Here, to systematically and thoroughly investigate the molecular mechanism of IFN signaling, we used a CRISPR/Cas9-based approach in a human cell line (HeLa) to generate knockouts (KOs) of the genes participating in the type 1 IFN signaling cascade. We show that both IFNAR chains (IFNAR1 and IFNAR2) are absolutely required for any IFN-induced signaling. Deletion of either signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 (STAT1) or STAT2 had only a partial effect on IFN-induced antiviral activity or gene induction. However, the deletion of both genes completely abrogated any IFN-induced activity. So did a double STAT2-IFN regulatory factor 1 (IRF1) KO and, to a large extent, a STAT1 KO together with IRF9 knockdown. KO of any of the STATs had no effect on the phosphorylation of other STATs, indicating that they bound IFNAR independently. STAT3 and STAT6 phosphorylations were fully induced by type 1 IFN in the STAT1-STAT2 KO, but did not promote gene induction. Moreover, STAT3 KO did not affect type 1 IFN-induced gene or protein expression. Type 1 IFN also did not activate p38, AKT, or ERK kinase. We conclude that type 1 IFN-induced activities in HeLa cells are mediated by STAT1/STAT2/IRF9, STAT1/STAT1, or STAT2/IRF9 complexes and do not require alternative pathways.

Fine Tuning of a Type 1 Interferon Antagonist.

Type I interferons are multi-potent cytokines that serve as first line of defense against viruses and other pathogens, posses immunomudolatory functions and elicit a growth inhibitory response. In recent years it has been shown that interferons are also detrimental, for example in lupus, AIDS, tuberculosis and cognitive decline, highlighted the need to develop interferon antagonists. We have previously developed the antagonist IFN-1ant, with much reduced binding to the IFNAR1 receptor and enhanced binding to IFNAR2. Here, we further tune the IFN-1ant by producing three additional antagonists based on IFN-1ant but with altered activity profiles. We show that in all three cases the antiproliferative activity of interferons is blocked and the induction of gene transcription of immunomudolatory and antiproliferative associated genes are substantially decreased. Conversely, each of the new antagonists elicits a different degree of antiviral response, STAT phosphorylation and related gene induction. Two of the new antagonists promote decreased activity in relation to the original IFN-1ant, while one of them promotes increased activity. As we do not know the exact causes of the detrimental effects of IFNs, the four antagonists that were produced and analyzed provide the opportunity to investigate the extent of antagonistic and agonistic activity optimal for a given condition.