Cooperative cardioprotection through adenosine A1 and A2A receptor agonism in ischemia-reperfused isolated mouse heart.

Recent reports have shown that adenosine A1 receptor-mediated cardioprotection requires concomitant A2 receptor activation, but no study thus far has shown that this phenomenon occurs using A1 agonists at reperfusion. Thus, we compared adenosine A2A receptor knockout (A2AKO) and wild-type mouse hearts (n = 9-11) subjected to global ischemia (30 minutes) and reperfusion (60 minutes) in the presence and absence of the A1 agonist N-cyclopentlyadenosine (CPA). We also determined the effects of selective antagonists at A2A and A2B receptors on CPA-induced protection. In wild-type hearts, CPA (100 nM) significantly (P < 0.05) improved contractility (52.7 ± 6.2% versus 23.9 ± 4.9% of preischemia), left ventricular developed pressure, end diastolic pressure; reduced infarct size (7.9 ± 1.7% versus 23.9 ± 6.6% area at risk); decreased lactate dehydrogenase efflux; and increased ERK1/2 phosphorylation at 60 minutes of reperfusion. Adenosine A2A (ZM241385, 50 nM) and A2B (MRS1754, 100 nM) receptor antagonists abolished CPA-mediated cardioprotection in wild-type groups as did the A1 receptor antagonist DPCPX (P < 0.05). In A2AKO hearts, CPA did not improve functional parameters and protective signaling with the exception of end diastolic pressure. In this model, using a clinically relevant mode of pharmacologic intervention, pERK 1/2-dependent A1-mediated cardioprotection requires a cooperative activation of A2 receptors, presumably through endogenous adenosine.

A novel highly selective adenosine A1 receptor agonist VCP28 reduces ischemia injury in a cardiac cell line and ischemia-reperfusion injury in isolated rat hearts at concentrations that do not affect heart rate.

The cardioprotective effects of a novel adenosine A1 receptor agonist N6-(2,2,5,5-tetramethylpyrrolidin-1-yloxyl-3-ylmethyl) adenosine (VCP28) were compared with the selective adenosine A1 receptor agonist N6-cyclopentyladenosine (CPA) in a H9c2(2-1) cardiac cell line-simulated ischemia (SI) model (12 hours) and a global ischemia (30 minutes) and reperfusion (60 minutes) model in isolated rat heart model. H9c2(2-1) cells were treated with CPA and VCP28 at the start of ischemia for entire ischemic duration, whereas isolated rat hearts were treated at the onset of reperfusion for 15 minutes. In the H9c2(2-1) cells SI model, CPA and VCP28 (100 nM) significantly (P < 0.05, n = 5-6) reduced the proportion of nonviable cells (30.88% +/- 2.49% and 16.17% +/- 3.77% of SI group, respectively) and lactate dehydrogenase efflux. In isolated rat hearts, CPA and VCP28 significantly (n = 6-8, P < 0.05) improved post-ischemic contractility (dP/dt(max), 81.69% +/- 10.96%, 91.07% +/- 19.87% of baseline, respectively), left ventricular developed pressure, and end diastolic pressure and reduced infarct size. The adenosine A1 receptor antagonist abolished the cardioprotective effects of CPA and VCP28 in SI model and isolated rat hearts. In conclusion, the adenosine A1 receptor agonist VCP28 has equal cardioprotective effects to the prototype A1 agonist CPA at concentrations that have no effect on heart rate.

Delineating the mode of action of adenosine A1 receptor allosteric modulators.

Despite the identification of 2-amino-3-benzoylthiophenes (2A3BTs) as the first example of small-molecule allosteric potentiators of agonist function at a G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR)-the adenosine A(1) receptor-their mechanism of action is still not fully understood. We now report the mechanistic basis for the complex behaviors noted for 2A3BTs at A(1) receptors. Using a combination of membrane-based and intact-cell radioligand binding, multiple signaling assays, and a native tissue bioassay, we found that the allosteric interaction between 2A3BTs and the agonists 2-chloro-N(6)-[(3)H]cyclopentyladenosine or (-)-N(6)-(2-phenylisopropyl)adenosine (R-PIA) or the antagonist [(3)H]8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine is consistent with a ternary complex model involving recognition of a single extracellular allosteric site. However, when allowed access to the intracellular milieu, 2A3BTs have a secondary action as direct G protein inhibitors; this latter property is receptor-independent as it is observed in nontransfected cells and also after stimulation of another GPCR. In addition, we found that 2A3BTs can signal as allosteric agonists in their own right but show bias toward certain pathways relative to the orthosteric agonist, R-PIA. These results indicate that 2A3BTs have a dual mode of action when interacting with the A(1) receptor and that they can engender novel functional selectivity in A(1) signaling. These mechanisms need to be factored into allosteric ligand structure-activity studies.

Cardioprotection induced by adenosine A1 receptor agonists in a cardiac cell ischemia model involves cooperative activation of adenosine A2A and A2B receptors by endogenous adenosine.

Extracellular adenosine concentrations increase within the heart during ischemia, and any exogenous adenosine receptor agonists therefore work in the context of significant local agonist concentrations. We evaluated the interactions between A1, A2A, A2B, and A3 receptors in the presence and absence of adenosine deaminase (ADA, which is used to remove endogenous adenosine) in a cardiac cell ischemia model. Simulated ischemia (SI) was induced by incubating H9c2(2-1) cells in SI medium for 12 hours in 100% N2 gas before assessment of necrosis using propidium iodide (5 microM) or apoptosis using AnnexinV-PE flow cytometry. N6-Cyclopentyladenosine (CPA; 10(-7)M) and N6-(3-iodobenzyl) adenosine-5'-N-methyluronamide (IB-MECA; 10(-7)M) reduced the proportion of nonviable cells to 30.87 +/- 2.49% and 35.18 +/- 10.30%, respectively (% of SI group). In the presence of ADA, the protective effect of CPA was reduced (62.82 +/- 3.52% nonviable), whereas the efficacy of IB-MECA was unchanged (35.81 +/- 3.84% nonviable; P < 0.05, n = 3-5, SI vs. SI + ADA). The protective effects of CPA and IB-MECA were abrogated in the presence of their respective antagonists DPCPX (8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine) and MRS1191 [3-ethyl-5-benzyl-2-methyl-4-phenylethynyl-6-phenyl-1,4-(+/-)-dihydropyridine-3,5-dicarboxylate], whereas A2A and A2B agonists had no significant effect. CPA-mediated protection was abrogated in the presence of both A2A (ZM241385, 4-(2-[7-amino-2-(2-furyl)[1,2,4]triazolo[2,3-a][1,3,5]triazin-5-lamino]ethyl)phenol; 50 nM) and A2B (MRS1754, 8-[4-[((4-cyanophenyl)carbamoylmethyl)oxy]phenyl]-1,3-di(n-propyl)xanthine; 200 nM) antagonists (n = 3-5, P < 0.05). In the absence of endogenous adenosine, significant protection was observed with CPA in presence of CGS21680 (4-[2-[[6-amino-9-(N-ethyl-b-D-ribofuranuronamidosyl)-9H-purin-2-yl]amino]ethyl]benzenepropanoic acid) or LUF5834 [2-amino-4-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-6-(1H-imidazol-2-ylmethylsulfanyl)pyridine-3,5-dicarbonitrile] (P < 0.05 vs. SI + ADA + CPA). Apoptosis (14.35 +/- 0.15% of cells in SI + ADA group; P < 0.05 vs. control) was not significantly reduced by CPA or IB-MECA. In conclusion, endogenous adenosine makes a significant contribution to A1 agonist-mediated prevention of necrosis in this SI model by cooperative interactions with both A2A and A2B receptors but does not play a role in A3 agonist-mediated protection.