Shoulder immobilizers. Shoulder immobilization devices.

Currently a myriad of devices are available for immobilization of the injured or postsurgical upper extremity. Some of these devices are straightforward and easily used, but some are more complicated and require more familiarity for their successful application. However, even simple devices have the potential for misapplication and thus prevent their benefit to the patient. This article is the second in a 3-part series. The goals of the series are (1) to present and review several devices on the market used by shoulder surgeons to immobilize the upper extremity, and (2) to discuss proper application and precautions of their use. It is intended that this series will benefit nurses, therapists, and trainers involved in the use of these devices.

The sling. Shoulder immobilization devices.

Currently a myriad of devices are available for immobilization of the injured or postsurgical upper extremity. Some of these devices are straightforward and easily used, but some are more complicated and require more familiarity for their successful application. However, even simple devices have the potential for misapplication and thus prevent their benefit to the patient. This article is the first in a 3-part series. The goals of the series are (1) to present and review several devices on the market used by shoulder surgeons to immobilize the upper extremity, and (2) to discuss proper application and precautions of their use. It is intended that this series will benefit nurses, therapists, and trainers involved in the use of these devices.

Shoulder immobilization devices.

Currently a myriad of devices are available for immobilization of the injured or postsurgical upper extremity. Some of these devices are straightforward and easily used, but some are more complicated and require more familiarity for their successful application. However, even simple devices have the potential for misapplication and thus prevent their benefit to the patient. This article is the third in a 3-part series. The goals of the series are (1) to present and review several devices on the market used by shoulder surgeons to immobilize the upper extremity, and (2) to discuss proper application and precautions of their use. It is intended that this series will benefit nurses, therapists, and trainers involved in the use of these devices.

Osteonecrosis of the talus: treatment by hindfoot fusion.

The results were reviewed for 11 ankles (10 patients) that had been treated with various hindfoot arthrodeses because of symptomatic osteonecrosis of the talus. Follow-up averaged 6.5 years (range, 2-15 years). A functional assessment using a modified Mazur grading system was performed both before surgery and at final follow-up. Data were also collected on the duration of the procedure, intraoperative findings, and the patient's assessment of postoperative cosmesis (excellent, good, fair, or poor). Radiographs were analyzed to determine the interval from the procedure until bony union. Nine of the 11 arthrodeses (82%) fused with the primary procedure and achieved excellent Mazur ratings (mean, 86 points; range, 81-90 points). The average interval until radiographic fusion was 7 months (range, 4-13 months). All eight patients (nine fusions) with successful fusions graded their cosmetic outcomes as excellent or good. The average length of the procedure was 148 minutes (range, 130-300 minutes), compared with an average of 92 minutes (range, 62-151 minutes) for ankle arthrodeses performed by the same surgeons in rheumatoid or osteoarthritic ankles (P < 0.001) and 102 minutes (range, 75-164 minutes) from a report in the literature. Two of the procedures were complicated by nonunions secondary to infections. In one patient, after treatment by debridement and intravenous antibiotics, reinfection and chronic osteomyelitis developed with a subsequent below-knee amputation. The other patient was treated successfully with debridement, antibiotics, and subsequent revision arthrodesis, which fused solidly at 9 months with an excellent result. We conclude that hindfoot arthrodeses for osteonecrosis can be technically demanding, but, despite having a long time to bony union, they can have an excellent clinical outcome.

Avascular necrosis of the humeral head treated by core decompression. A retrospective review.

Thirty shoulders, in 20 patients, which had undergone core decompression for symptomatic avascular necrosis of the humeral head were reviewed 2 to 14 years later (average 5.6). Twenty-two showed good or excellent clinical results; the other eight shoulders had required arthroplasty. All 14 shoulders with stage I or II radiological changes (Ficat and Arlet 1980) at operation had good or excellent results. We advocate early core decompression for symptomatic avascular necrosis of the humeral head.

Tibiotalar contact and fibular malunion in ankle fractures. A cadaver study.

Six cadaveric ankles were dissected, preserving medial and lateral ligaments; an axial load of 455N was applied to the tibia supported by the foot and ankle. The unconstrained tibia was moved through 20 degrees of flexion and extension to simulate walking. The tibiotalar contact area was defined using carbon black suspension, recorded photographically, and measured using computerized area analysis. Osteotomy of the distal fibula was performed and fixed with a specially modified plate; a selection of plates provided fixation with 0 degrees or 30 degrees of external rotation in combination with 0 or 2 mm of shortening. The contact area was measured for each of the plates and after division of the deltoid ligament. There were greater than 30 percent decreases in tibiotalar contact with both fibular shortening and external rotation, doubled with a divided deltoid ligament. Anatomic restoration of both fibular length and rotation is essential for normal ankle mechanics. The deltoid ligament has crucial effects on the stability of the ankle mortise.