Antibody responses and SARS-CoV-2 infection after BNT162b2 mRNA booster vaccination among healthcare workers in Japan.

INTRODUCTION: Vaccine effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 infections decreases due to waning immunity, and booster vaccination was therefore introduced. We estimated the anti-spike antibody (AS-ab) recovery by booster vaccination and analyzed the risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 infections. METHODS: The subjects were health care workers (HCWs) in a Chiba University Hospital vaccination cohort. They had received two doses of vaccine (BNT162b2) and a booster vaccine (BNT162b2). We retrospectively analyzed AS-ab titers and watched out for SARS-CoV-2 infection for 90 days following booster vaccination. RESULTS: AS-ab titer eight months after two-dose vaccinations had decreased to as low as 587 U/mL (median, IQR (interquartile range) 360-896). AS-ab titer had then increased to 22471 U/mL (15761-32622) three weeks after booster vaccination. There were no significant differences among age groups. A total of 1708 HCWs were analyzed for SARS-CoV-2 infection, and 48 of them proved positive. SARS-CoV-2 infections in the booster-vaccinated and non-booster groups were 1.8% and 4.0%, respectively, and were not significant. However, when restricted to those 20-29 years old, SARS-CoV-2 infections in the booster-vaccinated and non-booster groups were 2.9% and 13.6%, respectively (p = 0.04). After multivariate logistic regression, COVID-19 wards (adjusted odds ratio (aOR):2.9, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.5-5.6) and those aged 20-49 years (aOR:9.7, 95%CI 1.3-71.2) were risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 infection. CONCLUSIONS: Booster vaccination induced the recovery of AS-ab titers. Risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 infection were HCWs of COVID-19 wards and those aged 20-49 years. Increased vaccination coverage, together with implementing infection control, remains the primary means of preventing HCWs from SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Adverse effect investigation using application software after vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 for healthcare workers.

INTRODUCTION: The usefulness of smartphone-based application software as a way to manage adverse events (AEs) after vaccination is well known. The purpose of this study is to clarify the usefulness and precautions of employing a smartphone application for collecting AEs after the administration of Comirnaty®ï¸. METHODS: Healthcare workers (HCWs) who were vaccinated with Comirnaty®ï¸ were asked to register for the application software and to report AEs for 14 days after vaccination. AEs were self-reported according to severity. The software was set to output an alert in case of fever. RESULTS: The number of HCWs who received the first dose was 2,551, and 2,406 (94.3%) reported their vaccinations. 2,547 received the second dose, and 2,347 (92.1%) reported their vaccinations. With the first dose, the reporting rate stayed above 83.3% until the final day. On the other hand, that of the second dose decreased rapidly after 6 days. The most frequent symptom was "pain at injection site" (more than 70%). Severe AEs were 6.6% after the second dose, with 0.6% visiting a clinic. Many AEs peaked on the day after administration and disappeared within 1 week. There were few reports of fever. CONCLUSION: Smartphone applications can be used to collect information on AEs after vaccination. Application settings and dissemination are necessary to maintain the reporting rate of HCWs.