Resection depth and layer of underwater versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection of intermediate-sized colorectal polyps: A pilot study.

Background and study aims Curability of colorectal tumors is associated with resection depth and layer in endoscopic resection. Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UEMR) has not undergone sufficient histopathological evaluation. We conducted a pilot study to compare the effectiveness, including resection depth and layer, of UEMR and conventional endoscopic mucosal resection (CEMR). Patients and methods This study was a single-center, retrospective study. Patients with colorectal lesions were treated by UEMR or CEMR between January 2018 and March 2020. Eligible patients were selected from included patients in a 1:1 ratio using propensity score matching. We compared the resection depth and layer and treatment results between the UEMR and CEMR groups. Results We evaluated 55 patients undergoing UEMR and 291 patients undergoing CEMR. Using propensity score matching, we analyzed 54 lesions in each group. The proportion of specimens containing submucosal tissue was 100 % in both groups. The median thickness of the submucosal tissue was significantly greater in the CEMR group than in the UEMR group [1235 µm (95 % confidence interval [CI], 1020-1530 µm) vs. 950 µm (95 % CI, 830-1090 µm), respectively]. However, vertical margins were negative in all lesions in both groups. Conclusions Our findings suggest that the median thickness of submucosal tissue in the UEMR group was about 1,000 µm. Even though the resection depth achieved with UEMR was more superficial than that achieved with CEMR, UEMR may be a treatment option, especially for colorectal lesions ≤ 20 mm in diameter without suspicious findings of submucosal deeply invasive cancer.

Usefulness of the clip-and-snare method using the pre-looping technique for endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric neoplasia: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The clip-and-snare method using the pre-looping technique (CSM-PLT) was developed as a traction method for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) of gastric neoplasia. However, its usefulness has not been clearly established; thus, we aimed to assess the efficacy of CSM-PLT in gastric ESD. METHODS: In this multicenter, randomized controlled trial, patients with gastric adenoma or carcinoma with absolute or expanded indications for ESD were randomized into conventional ESD and CSM-PLT groups, using the minimization method based on operator experience, tumor location, tumor size, and excision device. The primary endpoint was ESD procedure time. Secondary endpoints were en bloc and R0 resection rates, and complications. RESULTS: We enrolled 402 patients between July 2017 and February 2020. After excluding patients with deviations from the protocol, we finally analyzed the data of 192 and 186 patients in the conventional and CSM-PLT groups, respectively. The procedure time was significantly shorter in the CSM-PLT group than in the conventional group (58.0 vs. 69.7 min; P=0.009). All lesions were resected en bloc. The R0 resection rate tended to be higher in the CSM-PLT group (P=0.09). No significant differences in complications were observed between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: CSM-PLT is beneficial for gastric ESD when compared with the conventional technique. CSM-PLT significantly reduced procedure times and improved R0 resection rates.

[Number of hospitalizations due to colonic diverticular bleeding as a predictive factor for readmission:an exploratory study].

Colonic diverticular bleeding often recurs and requires hospital readmission. This study aimed to examine the relationship between the rate of readmission and the number of hospitalizations due to colonic diverticular bleeding. We retrospectively studied 98 patients first admitted between January 2008 and July 2017 for the treatment of colonic diverticular bleeding. We investigated the subsequent number of hospitalizations due to colonic diverticular bleeding and classified the patients into 3 groups:those admitted for the first time (first group), those admitted for the second time (second group), and those admitted for the third time or later (third group). Generally, the readmission rate increased as the number of hospitalizations increased (P<0.01). The 1-year readmission rates were 11.6%, 23.2%, and 34.2% in the first, second, and third groups, respectively. The 2-year readmission rates were 15.1%, 50.1%, and 62.4% in the first, second, and third groups, respectively. The 3-year readmission rates were 21.7%, 50.1%, and 74.9% in the first, second, and third groups, respectively. Thus, the number of hospitalizations due to colonic diverticular bleeding could be a predictive factor for readmission. We also classified the patients into 2 additional groups:those who had been readmitted (readmission group) and those who had not (no readmission group). Furthermore, we examined background and therapeutic factors, and found hypovolemic shock on admission to be an independent risk factor (odds ratio 14.1). Preventive treatments for such high-risk patients should be considered.

A case of Trousseau syndrome associated with a mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma disseminated to the mesenteric adipose tissue.

A 66-year-old man with recurrent stroke within a short period of time was referred to our department from the neurology department to rule out any malignancy. An endoscopic examination revealed a white depressed lesion in the body of the stomach, and computed tomography revealed a high-density area in the mesentery around the stomach. A mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma was detected from both the stomach biopsy and resected mesenteric specimen. Systemic chemotherapy was administered for the MALT lymphoma (Lugano classification stage IV). Cerebral infarction did not occur after the treatment. We concluded that Trousseau syndrome associated with the MALT lymphoma disseminated to the mesenteric adipose tissue. A MALT lymphoma has a small probability of occurring in Trousseau syndrome.