Primary gastric synovial sarcoma resected by laparoscopic endoscopic cooperative surgery of the stomach: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Primary gastric synovial sarcoma is extremely rare, only 44 cases have been reported so far, and there have been no reports of laparoscopic endoscopic cooperative surgery for this condition. CASE PRESENTATION: A 45-year-old male patient presented with gastric pain. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy was performed that led to the identification of an 8-mm submucosal tumor in the anterior wall of the antrum, and a kit-negative gastrointestinal stromal tumor was suspected following biopsy. On endoscopic ultrasonography, the boundary of the tumor, mainly composed of the second layer, was depicted as a slightly unclear low-echo region, and a pointless no echo region was scattered inside. A boring biopsy revealed synovial sarcoma. Positron emission tomography did not reveal fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) accumulation in the stomach or other organs. Thus, the patient was diagnosed with a primary gastric synovial sarcoma, and laparoscopic endoscopic cooperative surgery was performed. The tumor of the antrum could not be confirmed laparoscopically from the serosa, and under intraoperative endoscopy, it had delle on the mucosal surface, which was removed by a method that does not involve releasing the gastric wall. Immunohistochemistry showed that the spindle cells were positive for EMA, BCL-2 protein, TLE-1, and SS18-SSX fusion-specific antibodies but negative for KIT and DOG-1. The final pathological diagnosis was synovial sarcoma of the stomach. The postoperative course was good, and the patient was discharged from the hospital on the 11th postoperative day. CONCLUSION: Resection with laparoscopic endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS), which has not been reported before, was effective for small synovial sarcomas that could not be confirmed laparoscopically. With the combination of laparoscopic and endoscopic approaches to neoplasia with a non-exposure technique (CLEAN-NET) procedure, it was possible to excise the tumor with the minimum excision range of the gastric serosa without opening the stomach.

Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm-associated pancreatic cancer: A case report.

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) of the pancreas is often found incidentally during examination for other diseases. In addition to the risk of malignant transformation, patients with IPMN are at risk of developing pancreatic cancer. We report a case of pancreatic tail cancer that developed separately from a preexisting IPMN after minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer of the esophagogastric junction and was resected successfully by laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. CASE PRESENTATION: A 72-year-old man underwent thoracoscopic and laparoscopic esophagectomy for esophagogastric junction cancer. He had undergone surgery for ascending colon cancer 20 years ago. At that time, IPMN was confirmed in the pancreatic body by a preoperative examination. Computed tomography was regularly performed for postoperative work-up and follow-up of the IPMN, and a solid lesion with cystic components was detected in the pancreatic tail 9 months after the operation. On detailed examination, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma concomitant with IPMN, accompanied by a retention cyst, was considered. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy was successfully performed after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Pathological diagnosis of the lesion in the pancreatic tail was of an invasive intraductal papillary mucinous carcinoma (ypT3ypN0yM0 ypStageIIA). CLINICAL DISCUSSION: If an IPMN is detected during preoperative examination for malignancies of other organs, careful follow-up is necessary due to the high risk of pancreatic cancer development. Furthermore, initial operation with minimally invasive surgery may reduce adhesion and facilitate subsequent surgeries. CONCLUSION: We have provided evidence that supports the importance of a careful follow-up of IPMNs, even if they are low risk.

[A Case of Anastomotic Stenosis with Reconstructed Small Intestine Mucosal Damage during Taking S-1 Orally after Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer].

An 83-year-old woman underwent laparoscopic distal gastrectomy and Billroth Ⅱ reconstruction for gastric cancer. Since histopathological examination revealed that the lesion was Stage ⅢA, she had started taking S-1 as an adjuvant chemotherapy 7 weeks after gastrectomy. Seventeen days later after taking S-1 administration, she felt nauseous and self-interrupted. Nineteen days later, she was urgently hospitalized. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy(EGD)showed anastomotic lumen was open, but reconstructed small intestine mucosal damage was found, and reconstructed small intestine muscle layer was fused to anastomotic region. On 50th day of hospitalization, mucosa was regenerated and endoscopic balloon dilatation (EBD)was performed from 78th day. She was discharged on 151th day of hospitalization after 7 times of EBD. One year later, she does not need EBD and can be taken orally and has no recurrence.

Age is no longer a limit: two cases of hepatectomy in patients over 90 years old.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common malignant tumor with poor prognosis. The age of patients affected by HCC is considered to be increasing, and several studies have reported significantly higher rates of morbidity and mortality after hepatectomy for HCC in elderly patients. However, other studies have reported that the short- and long-term outcomes of surgery for HCC in elderly patients are similar to those in younger patients. Whether the indications for hepatic resection in elderly patients resemble those in younger patients has thus been questioned. We describe two cases of patients over 90 years old who underwent major hepatectomy for HCC, representing the oldest patients in the world to have done so.

[Tracheal repair injury during thoracoscopic surgery for esophageal cancer after induction chemotherapy; report of a case].

72-year-old female had thoracoscopic esophagectomy for advanced thoracic esophageal cancer after induction chemotherapy with CDDP(70 mg/m2, day 1) +5-FU (650 mg/m2, day 1-5). Since the membranous portion of trachea was injured due to dense adhesion thoracoscopic surgery was converted to mini-thoracotomy. Injured portion was closed with 4-0 absorbable suture, and covered with gastric tube for reconstruction through posterior mediastinal route. No respiratory complications occurred after surgery and the patient discharged at the 12 post operative days.

Efficacy and safety of irinotecan plus S-1 (IRIS) therapy to treat advanced/recurrent colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU), leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) therapy and 5-FU, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) therapy are standard chemotherapies to treat advanced/recurrent colorectal cancer. However, these chemotherapies require continuous infusion of 5-FU for a prolonged time of 40 h or more, every two weeks. Accordingly, these chemotherapies require hospitalization and placement of a central venous catheter. Because of frequent catheterization, long-term use of these therapies potentially risks complications such as infection and thrombosis. In contrast, S-1 (tegaful, gimeracil, oteracil) combined with irinotecan (IRIS) therapy involves giving one drug orally and infusing the other for about two hours every two weeks, so placement of a central venous catheter is not necessary. The current study examined the efficacy and safety of IRIS therapy in 90 patients at this Hospital who underwent such therapy to treat advanced/recurrent colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study comprised 90 patients who underwent IRIS therapy to treat advanced/recurrent colorectal cancer from December 2004 to December 2011. RESULTS: The ratio of male-to-female patients was 64:26. The mean age at the start of IRIS therapy was 64.5 years, and patients underwent an average of 11 courses of therapy. The response rate to IRIS therapy was 14.8%, the disease control rate was 60.5%, and the overall survival time was 26.7 months. The incidence of adverse events was 70.0%, and the incidence of grade 3 or more severe adverse reactions was 17.8%. CONCLUSION: In comparison to the standard therapies of FOLFOX and FOLFIRI, IRIS therapy had a lower response rate but led to an equivalent overall survival time. IRIS therapy had a low incidence of serious adverse events and allowed patients to continue therapy on an out-patient basis. These findings indicate that IRIS therapy may be a useful form of chemotherapy to treat advanced/recurrent colorectal cancer.