Knowledge, Perceptions, and Perspectives of Medical Students Regarding the Use of Antibiotics and Antibiotic Resistance: A Qualitative Research in Galicia, Spain.

Antibiotic resistance is a significant public health concern, with numerous studies linking antibiotic consumption to the development of resistance. As medical students will play a pivotal role in prescribing antibiotics, this research aimed to identify their perceptions of current use and factors that could influence future inappropriate use of antibiotics. The study employed a qualitative research approach using Focus Group discussions (FGs) consisting of students from the final theoretical course of the Medicine degree. The FGs were conducted based on a pre-script developed from factors contributing to antibiotic misuse identified in previous studies. All sessions were recorded and transcribed for analysis by two independent researchers, with all participants signing informed consent. Seven focus groups were conducted, with a total of 35 participants. The study identified factors that could influence the future prescription of antibiotics, including the low applicability of knowledge, insecurity, clinical inertia, difficulties in the doctor-patient relationship, unawareness of available updates on the topic, and inability to assess their validity. The students did not perceive antibiotic resistance as a current problem. However, the study found several modifiable factors in medical students that could explain the misuse of antibiotics, and developing specific strategies could help improve their use.

Factors determining antibiotic use in the general population: A qualitative study in Spain.

BACKGROUND: Antibiotic resistance is an important Public Health problem and many studies link it to antibiotic misuse. The population plays a key role in such misuse. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was thus to explore the factors that might influence antibiotic use and resistance in the general population. METHODS: Qualitative research using the focus group (FG) method. Groups were formed by reference to the following criteria: age (over and under 65 years); place of origin; and educational/professional qualifications. FG sessions were recorded, transcribed and then separately analysed by two researchers working independently. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. RESULTS: Eleven FGs were formed with a total of 75 participants. The principal factors identified as possible determinants of antibiotic misuse were: (i) lack of knowledge about antibiotics; (ii) doctor-patient relationship problems; (iii) problems of adherence; and, (iv) use without medical prescription. Antibiotic resistance is a phenomenon unknown to the population and is perceived as an individual problem, with the term "resistance" being confused with "tolerance". None of the groups reported that information about resistance had been disseminated by the health care sector. CONCLUSIONS: The public is unaware of the important role it plays in the advance of antimicrobial resistance. There is evidence of diverse factors, many of them modifiable, which might account for antibiotic misuse. Better understanding these factors could be useful in drawing up specific strategies aimed at improving antibiotic use.

Análisis de los problemas relacionados con la medicación en pacientes polimedicados mayores de 64 años en atención primaria. Un estudio descriptivo transversal / Analysis of drug-related problems in polymedicated patients over the age of 64 in primary care. A cross-sectional descriptive study

OBJETIVO: Identificar los problemas relacionados con la medicación mediante los criterios STOPP/START en pacientes polimedicados mayores de 64 años con 12 o más fármacos. MÉTODO: Estudio descriptivo transversal. Se analizaron 172 casos seleccionados aleatoriamente del registro de 1.500 pacientes polimedicados del Programa de Mejora de la Calidad en el Paciente Crónico y Polimedicado del Servicio Gallego de Salud para el área de Santiago en el 2017. Se registraron los problemas relacionados con los medicamentos y los resultados negativos asociados a la medicación. El incumplimiento terapéutico se evaluó mediante el test de Morisky-Green-Levine. Las intervenciones enfermeras se registraron a partir del informe enfermero del programa. Se realizó análisis bivariante de los datos y la asociación entre las variables se estimó mediante el cálculo de la odds ratio. RESULTADO: El 56,4% de las pacientes eran mujeres. La media de edad fue de 77,34±10,11 años. El problema más habitual fue la probabilidad de presentar efectos adversos, observándose en el 64,1% de los pacientes. Las mujeres presentaron mayor probabilidad de presentar este problema que los varones (OR: 1,37; IC 95%: 1,06-1,78). Un 18% de los pacientes se consideraron no cumplidores del tratamiento prescrito, según el test de Morisky-Green-Levine. Un 25,6% de los pacientes recibieron intervenciones de educación sanitaria. CONCLUSIONES: La enfermera debe reevaluar periódicamente la medicación de los pacientes para comprobar adherencia al tratamiento y conocer si están provocando algún tipo de efecto adverso, así como incorporar a su actividad intervenciones de educación para la salud en este campo

OBJECTIVE: To identify drug-related problems using the STOPP/START criteria of patients over 64 years polymedicated with 12 or more drugs. METHOD: Descriptive cross-sectional. We analysed 172 cases randomly selected from the register of 1500 polymedicated patients of the Quality Improvement Programme for Chronic and Polymedicated Patients of the Galician Health Service for the area of Santiago in 2017. Drug-related problems and the negative results associated with medication were recorded. Treatment compliance was assessed by the Morisky-Green-Levine test. Nursing interventions were recorded based on the Programme's nursing report. Bivariate analysis of the data was performed and the association between the variables was estimated by calculating the odds ratio (OR). RESULTS: The 56.4% of the patients were women. The mean age was 77.34±10.11 years. The most common problem was the likelihood of presenting adverse effects, observed in 64.1% of the patients. Women were more likely to have this problem than men (OR: 1.37; 95% CI: 1.06-1.78). Eighteen percent of the patients were considered non-compliant with the prescribed treatment, according to the Morisky-Green-Levine test. Of the patients, 25.6% had received health education interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Nurses must periodically re-evaluate patient medication to check adherence to treatment and determine whether it is causing any type of adverse effect, as well as incorporate health education interventions in this field into their activity

Analysis of drug-related problems in polymedicated patients over the age of 64 in primary care. A cross-sectional descriptive study. / Análisis de los problemas relacionados con la medicación en pacientes polimedicados mayores de 64 años en atención primaria. Un estudio descriptivo transversal.

OBJECTIVE: To identify drug-related problems using the STOPP/START criteria of patients over 64 years polymedicated with 12 or more drugs. METHOD: Descriptive cross-sectional. We analysed 172 cases randomly selected from the register of 1500 polymedicated patients of the Quality Improvement Programme for Chronic and Polymedicated Patients of the Galician Health Service for the area of Santiago in 2017. Drug-related problems and the negative results associated with medication were recorded. Treatment compliance was assessed by the Morisky-Green-Levine test. Nursing interventions were recorded based on the Programme's nursing report. Bivariate analysis of the data was performed and the association between the variables was estimated by calculating the odds ratio (OR). RESULTS: The 56.4% of the patients were women. The mean age was 77.34±10.11 years. The most common problem was the likelihood of presenting adverse effects, observed in 64.1% of the patients. Women were more likely to have this problem than men (OR: 1.37; 95% CI: 1.06-1.78). Eighteen percent of the patients were considered non-compliant with the prescribed treatment, according to the Morisky-Green-Levine test. Of the patients, 25.6% had received health education interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Nurses must periodically re-evaluate patient medication to check adherence to treatment and determine whether it is causing any type of adverse effect, as well as incorporate health education interventions in this field into their activity.

Parent-related factors influencing antibiotic use in a paediatric population: A qualitative study in Spain.

AIM: To explore the parent-related factors underlying antibiotic misuse/overuse and their implication in the development of resistance in the paediatric population. METHODS: Qualitative study using the focus group (FG) method in Galicia (Spain). FG sessions were conducted with the parents, 27 mothers and three fathers, of children under 12 years old. A discussion topic guide was developed to lead the sessions, which were then transcribed by the researcher and independently interpreted by two researchers working separately. The grounded theory approach was used. RESULTS: Five FG sessions were conducted. The principal factor detected among parents was fear, associated with the perception of poor parent-paediatrician communication. This factor was related to the following behaviours: (a) pressure on physicians; (b) lack of adherence to treatment; and (c) search for other ways of accessing antibiotics. No group highlighted antibiotic resistance as posing a real problem. All groups considered certain external agents to be responsible for such resistance. Four groups also acknowledged that patient behaviour can influence antibiotic resistance. CONCLUSION: Our study points to poor communication between the healthcare system and the population. Identifying the factors underlying the problem enables more efficient, tailor-made interventions to be designed for the purpose of improving antibiotic use and resistance.

Misprescription of antibiotics in primary care: a critical systematic review of its determinants.

BACKGROUND: Antibiotic resistance is one of the principal public health problems worldwide. Currently, inappropriate use of antibiotics is regarded as the principal determinant of resistance, with most of these drugs being prescribed outside a hospital setting. This systematic review sought to identify the factors, attitudes and knowledge linked to misprescription of antibiotics. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted using the MEDLINE-PubMed and EMBASE databases. The selection criteria required that papers: (1) be published in English or Spanish; (2) designate their objective as that of addressing attitudes/knowledge or other factors related with the prescribing of antibiotics; and (3) use quality and/or quantity indicators to define misprescription. The following were excluded: any paper that used qualitative methodology and any paper that included descriptive analysis only. RESULTS: A total of 46 papers that met the inclusion criteria were included in the review. They were very heterogeneous and displayed major methodological limitations. Doctors' socio-demographic and personal factors did not appear to exert much influence. Complacency (fulfilling what professionals perceived as being patients'/parents' expectations) and, to a lesser extent, fear (fear of possible complications in the patient) were the attitudes associated with misprescription of antibiotics. CONCLUSIONS: Before designing interventions aimed at improving the prescription and use of antibiotics, studies are needed to identify precisely which factors influence prescribing.

Attitudes of primary care physicians to the prescribing of antibiotics and antimicrobial resistance: a qualitative study from Spain.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Resistance to antibiotics is a public health threat. A number of studies confirm the relationship between antibiotic use and the resistance rate. As a whole, physicians represent a large proportion of the health professionals involved in the use of this therapeutic group. Our study therefore sought to ascertain the opinions and attitudes of GPs in Spain with respect to antibiotics and resistance. METHODS: We used the focus group (FG) method, with each group comprising 4-12 primary care physicians and a moderator. Based on a previous systematic review, we drew up an agenda to be followed during the holding of the sessions. Group proceedings were recorded and the transcriptions then analysed separately by two researchers. RESULTS: Five FGs were formed, including a total of 33 physicians. The factors/attitudes that influenced the prescribing of antibiotics by GPs were fear, complacency, insufficient knowledge and external responsibility of the pharmaceutical industry, patients and over-the-counter antibiotics. The groups felt that antibiotic resistance was not a problem at a community level. CONCLUSIONS: Identification of attitudes/knowledge related with inappropriate antibiotic prescribing will enable specific interventions to be designed, with the aim of targeting these shortcomings to improve antibiotic use and help reduce resistance.

Impact of a pharmacotherapeutic programme on control and safety of long-term anticoagulation treatment: a controlled follow-up study in Spain.

BACKGROUND: In patients undergoing oral anticoagulation treatment, correct control of the international normalized ratio (INR) is necessary. This study sought to assess the effectiveness of a pharmacotherapeutic follow-up programme (PTP) on achieving an optimal INR range, reducing the need for rescue medications and for monitoring the development of possible adverse events associated with poor oral anticoagulation therapy control (haemorrhagic events and thromboembolic disease). OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a PTP targeted at the anticoagulated patient to ensure proper self-control of anticoagulation. METHODS: This was a prospective, controlled, multicentre cohort study conducted at four primary care centres in Galicia (northwest Spain), covering a group of patients receiving anticoagulation treatment exposed to pharmacotherapeutic follow-up by a primary care pharmacist (n = 272), and a concurrent control group (n = 460). The intervention consisted of a patient health-education programme plus activities involving collaboration with the physician. The educational intervention exposure period was 12 months (starting from February 2006 and finishing in February 2007), during which time a minimum of one INR determination per month was performed. To assess the quality of haematological control, the British Committee for Standards in Haematology criteria were used, namely (i) 50% or more determinations per patient within a range of 0.5 units above or below the target INR; and (ii) 80% or more determinations per patient within a range of 0.75 units above or below the target INR. As an indicator of correct control of coagulation, we also assessed the occurrence of oral anticoagulation therapy-related adverse events, such as active bleeding, haematomas (jointly referred to as haemorrhagic events) and thromboembolic events. Depending on the type of response variable, negative binomial regression or Cox proportional risks models were fitted. RESULTS: Compared with the control group, the PTP managed to improve correct INR ranges by (i) 25% (relative risk [RR] = 0.75; 95% CI 0.69, 0.82) in terms of the number of patients who had their determinations within ±0.5 units of the target range; and (ii) 26% (RR = 0.74; 95% CI 0.67, 0.81) in terms of the number of patients who had their determinations within ±0.75 units of the target range. Patients belonging to the intervention group registered a 75% reduction in bleeding (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.25; 95% CI 0.18, 0.36). For every 3.27 patients exposed to the PTP, one event would be prevented (number needed to treat = 3.27; 95% CI 2.73, 4.07). CONCLUSIONS: Including patients receiving oral anticoagulant treatment in a PTP enhances INR control, efficacy and safety of treatment, and efficiency of primary healthcare services.