Prophylactic low-energy shock wave therapy improves wound healing after vein harvesting for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a prospective, randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Wound healing disorders after vein harvesting for coronary artery bypass graft surgery increase morbidity and lower patient satisfaction. Low-energy shock wave therapy (SWT) reportedly improves healing of diabetic and vascular ulcers by overexpression of vascular endothelial growth fractor and downregulation of necrosis factor kappaB. In this study, we investigate whether prophylactic low-energy SWT improves wound healing after vein harvesting for coronary artery bypass graft surgery. METHODS: One hundred consecutive patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery were randomly assigned to either prophylactic low-energy SWT (n = 50) or control (n = 50). Low-energy SWT was applied to the site of vein harvesting after wound closure under sterile conditions using a commercially available SWT system (Dermagold; Tissue Regeneration Technologies, Woodstock, GA). A total of 25 impulses (0.1 mJ/mm(2); 5 Hz) were applied per centimeter wound length. Wound healing was evaluated and quantified using the ASEPSIS score. (ASEPSIS stands for Additional treatment, presence of Serous discharge, Erythema, Purulent exudate, Separation of the deep tissue, Isolation of bacteria, and duration of inpatient Stay). Patient demographics, operative data, and postoperative adverse events were monitored. RESULTS: Patient characteristics and operative data including wound length (SWT 39 +/- 13 cm versus control 37 +/- 11 cm, p = 0.342) were comparable between the two groups. We observed lower ASEPSIS scores indicating improved wound healing in the SWT group (4.4 +/- 5.3) compared with the control group (11.6 +/- 8.3, p = 0.0001). Interestingly, we observed a higher incidence of wound healing disorders necessitating antibiotic treatment in the control group (22%) as compared with the SWT group (4%, p = 0.015). No SWT-associated adverse events were observed in the treatment group. CONCLUSIONS: As shown in this prospective randomized study, prophylactic application of low-energy SWT improves wound healing after vein harvesting for coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

Bone marrow stromal cells can provide a local environment that favors migration and formation of tubular structures of endothelial cells.

Findings suggest that mesenchymal progenitor cells can support the process of blood vessel formation, which may be relevant during granulation tissue formation at defect sites. The aim of this study was to investigate possible mechanisms of the angiogenic process that can be stimulated by mesenchymal progenitor cells. In the in vivo-like model of the chick embryo chorioallantoic membrane assay, we observed blood vessel ingrowth into collagen sponges containing conditioned medium from undifferentiated bone marrow stromal cells. In the Boyden chamber assay, the conditioned medium was chemotactic for human umbilical vascular endothelial cells and human uterus microvascular endothelial cells, and when cells were placed on Matrigel-coated culture dishes, formation of tubular structures was enhanced. The presence of vascular endothelial growth factor-neutralizing antibodies did not affect the outcome of the two in vitro assays. Bone marrow stromal cell-conditioned medium had no effect on proliferation of endothelial cells, as determined by measuring [3H]thymidine incorporation, and on matrix metalloproteinase 2 expression, as evaluated by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction and gelatin zymography. These data indicate that mesenchymal progenitor cells can provide a local environment that supports the ingrowth of blood vessels into a defect site.