Strategies for Developing Sensitive and Automated LC-MS/MS Assays of a Pharmaceutical Compound and Its Metabolite from Whole Blood Matrix.

When compared with biological samples in other matrices (plasma, urine, etc.) that are typically seen in bioanalytical applications, whole blood samples present unique challenges in method development, because of the viscous nature of blood and complexity of its constituents. In this article, we have developed and validated a series of quantitative bioanalytical methods for the determination of a pharmaceutical compound, Compound A, and its phosphate metabolite from whole blood matrices using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. All methods employed a simple protein precipitation procedure that was automated in 96-well format. The methods were subjected to vigorous tests in precision, accuracy, matrix effect, reproducibility, and robustness. Monolithic chromatography was used to improve sample throughput in one of the methods. The results also demonstrated that proper sample preparation procedures, such as sample transfer and lysing of blood cells prior to the extraction, are key to reproducible results for pharmacokinetic parameter determination.

Highly sensitive LC-MS-MS analysis of a pharmaceutical compound in human plasma using monolithic phase-based on-line extraction.

Monolithic columns have been used in recent years for fast chromatographic separation due to their high permeability and low backpressure. We have explored the potential of monolithic material as sample preparation tool in bioanalytical applications. By taking advantage of monolithic columns' online concentration capability, we have developed a highly sensitive liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry assay for quantitative determination of a pharmaceutical compound in human plasma. The assay was fully validated to satisfy the requirements of precision and accuracy, selectivity, matrix effect, and reproducibility. A linear dynamic range from 0.011 ng/mL to 12.3 ng/mL was established as the calibration standard. The percentage of bias for quality control samples was between -9.9% and -2.5%. Coefficient of variation, a measurement of precision, was within 9.9%. On-line extraction with monolithic support provided adequate sample cleanup and on-line concentration of the analyte. The assay exhibited good tolerance to matrix effect and has been applied successfully to a clinical study. The incurred sample analysis showed that original and repeat values were within +/-10.1% for all assay samples.