Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech ; 19(5): 410-4, 2009 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19851273

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To describe our experience with laparoscopic transperitoneal vesico-vaginal fistula (VVF) repair and we review current literature. METHODS: Four patients with VVF underwent transperitoneal transvesical laparoscopic repair, with the same principles of open abdominal approach. We considered: operation time, complications, hospital stay, Foley catheter duration, and recurrence during the follow-up. RESULTS: Mean operative time was 103 minutes and no complications were recorded. Average length of hospital stay was 3 days, Foley catheter remained indwelling on an average of 8 days. All patients were cured, after a mean of 14.5 months no recurrence was recorded and no patient referred urinary symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of our and literature data, we believe that laparoscopic VVF repair is feasible, safe and effective and it is a viable alternative to the traditional open procedure.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/efeitos adversos , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Fístula Vesicovaginal/cirurgia , Adulto , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Laparoscopia/estatística & dados numéricos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
BJU Int ; 103(12): 1700-3, 2009 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19159408

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate, in a prospective randomized pilot study, the effectiveness and safety of tamsulosin, administered in patients with distal ureteric stones and who have already undergone an unsuccessful first cycle of medical expulsive therapy (MET). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We evaluated the effectiveness and safety of tamsulosin, administered as a further therapy, in patients previously unsuccessfully treated with combined expulsive 10-day therapy (tamsulosin + deflazacort) for distal ureteric stones. Ninety-one patients were enrolled and randomized into two groups, each receiving a different therapy for 10 days. Group A (46 patients) received a further cycle of tamsulosin (0.4 mg daily), and group B (45) did not. Age, gender, stone size, time to expulsion, number of acute episodes of colic during treatment and analgesic consumption were recorded. Patients who were not stone-free after the study period had ureteroscopy. The results were compared statistically using Student's t-, chi-square test and Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: The groups were comparable in age, gender and stone size (5.93 mm for group A and 6.03 mm for group B). The expulsion rate was significantly higher in group A (80%) than in group B (49%) (P < 0.01), whilst there were no differences between the groups in the number of colic episodes and analgesic use. There were no reported side-effects of medical therapy. CONCLUSIONS: A second cycle of 10 days of MET with tamsulosin in nonresponders to a 10-day first cycle of MET with tamsulosin and deflazacort is safe and effective, and therefore should be considered as an option in the management of uncomplicated distal ureteric stones.


Assuntos
Antagonistas Adrenérgicos alfa/administração & dosagem , Pregnenodionas/administração & dosagem , Sulfonamidas/administração & dosagem , Cálculos Ureterais/tratamento farmacológico , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos alfa/efeitos adversos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Projetos Piloto , Pregnenodionas/efeitos adversos , Estudos Prospectivos , Retratamento , Sulfonamidas/efeitos adversos , Tansulosina , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
BJU Int ; 103(11): 1532-6, 2009 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19154478

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES To evaluate, in a pilot prospective randomized trial, the safety, effectiveness and radiological recurrence of retroperitoneal renal cyst decortication compared with retroperitoneal decortication with wadding using perirenal pedicled fat tissue. PATIENTS AND METHODS From March 2004 to December 2007, 40 patients with simple renal cysts were enrolled and randomized; 22 (group A) had a simple retroperitoneal decortication (SRD) and 18 (group B) a decortication with wadding of the cyst using perirenal fat tissue (RDCW). The following variables were recorded: age, gender, side, size on ultrasonography/computed tomography (CT), location, operative duration, blood loss, complications, pathology, presence or absence of flank pain, hypertension, urinary tract compression or urinary infection. The primary endpoint of this trial was to evaluate and compare the efficacy of both treatments. Secondary endpoints were safety and pain, hypertension and the resolution of urinary tract obstruction. RESULTS In all, 40 cysts were treated; there were no bilateral cysts. The mean (sd) size on CT was 11.9 (1.84) cm in group A and 12.8 (1.25) cm in group B (P = 0.1). All the procedures were completed laparoscopically and no conversion was necessary. There were no intraoperative complications. The mean (range) hospital stay was 3.4 (3-6) days. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups for all variables assessed. There was a radiological recurrence in three patients (14%) in group A, but none in group B (all successful). CONCLUSION To be completely successful, with maximum safety and to prevent recurrences in the treatment of renal cysts, RCDW is recommended when a retroperitoneal approach is chosen, especially if the cyst is located anteriorly. When symptom relief is considered, RCDW duplicates the results obtained with SRD.


Assuntos
Dor no Flanco/cirurgia , Doenças Renais Císticas/cirurgia , Laparoscopia , Métodos Epidemiológicos , Feminino , Dor no Flanco/etiologia , Humanos , Doenças Renais Císticas/complicações , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medição da Dor , Espaço Retroperitoneal , Prevenção Secundária , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
Eur Urol ; 50(2): 339-44, 2006 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16574310

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To assess the clinical role of corticosteroids in the medical expulsive therapy of symptomatic distal ureteral stones. METHODS: Between January 2004 and September 2005, 114 patients with symptomatic distal ureteral stones with a >/=5mm diameter were enrolled in this prospective study and divided into four groups based on the urologist (of four) who treated them in the emergency unit. Group A (33 patients) received tamsulosin (0.4mg daily), group B (24 patients) received deflazacort (30mg daily), group C (33 patients) received both (0.4mg tamsulosin+30mg deflazacort daily), and control group D (24 patients) received only analgesics. The treatment duration was 10 d to prevent the side-effects of prolonged corticosteroid therapy. The end points were the expulsion rate, analgesic consumption, number of ureteroscopies, and safety. RESULTS: The groups were comparable in terms of age, sex, and stone location. The stone diameter was 5.96+/-0.33mm for group A, 5.83+/-0.4mm for group B, 5.88+/-0.23mm for group C, and 5.71+/-0.5mm (p>0.05) for group D. The rates of expulsion for the four groups were 60%, 37.5%, 84.8%, and 33.3%, respectively. There was a significant difference between group C and the other groups (p<0.001). The mean analgesic consumption was 42.5+/-0.4mg for group A, 50+/-0.3mg for group B, 27.3+/-0.5mg for group C, and 81+/-0.33mg for group D, with a significant difference between group C and the other groups (p<0.001). During the treatment period, only two cases of drug side-effects related to tamsulosin (without any drop-outs) were recorded. CONCLUSION: When the medical expulsive therapy for symptomatic distal ureteral stones is considered, the use of steroids (deflazacort) proves efficient only when administered together with alpha(1)-blockers (tamsulosin). In addition, tamsulosin used on its own as a medical expulsive therapy can be considered as an alternative treatment for those patients who are not suitable for steroid therapy, as it is generally efficient.


Assuntos
Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos alfa/uso terapêutico , Pregnenodionas/uso terapêutico , Sulfonamidas/uso terapêutico , Cálculos Ureterais/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Tansulosina , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...