Improvement of patient care through hirudotherapy and the management of leeches from their reception to their disposal in France.

OBJECTIVE: Medicinal leech therapy - known as hirudotherapy (HT) - is an empirical medical technique that has become popular again in reconstructive surgery. However, at each step of leech management there are risks for blood contamination of the caregivers and severe infections for patients. This reduces the success of the treatment. The aim of this study was to improve the management of leeches from ordering to disposal to improve patient care. METHODS: First, a review of the literature was performed. Second, we conducted a retrospective study of patients' antibiotic prophylaxis from January 2018 to December 2019. The data we collected were patient characteristics, the specific care unit at the hospital, indication, contra-indication, posology, duration of HT, number of leeches delivered, antibiotic prophylaxis prescribed and microbial organism, if identified. Third, an interdisciplinary meeting was organised to review the entire leech circuit: ordering, maintenance, prescription, dispensing, application and disposal. RESULTS: At the end of the literature review, six articles based on practices implemented in France were selected for inclusion. These articles discussed antibiotic prophylaxis, iron supplementation, and leech storage, application and disposal. On the retrospective study performed, antibiotic prophylaxis for HT was performed for 60% (30/50) of patients, 77% (23/30) of the prescriptions followed the recommendations for antibiotic prophylaxis, and 20 patients did not receive antibiotic prophylaxis. The interdisciplinary meeting made it possible to define a collegially validated protocol, containing a computerised antibiotic prophylaxis prescription, including per os ciprofloxacin antibiotic prophylaxis, intravenous iron supplementation and biological monitoring. A leech application protocol was created, and the method of leech disposal was revised. CONCLUSION: Despite the absence of clear guidelines and heterogeneous practices, this study reveals the importance of a standard procedure including leech management practices before use, antibiotic prophylaxis and application and disposal guides. The interdisciplinary protocol allows improved patient care management and makes leech management safer for caregivers.

[Validation of a method for detecting hospitalizations for falls related to adverse drug reactions in geriatric departments]. / Validation d'une méthode de détection des hospitalisations pour chute liées à un effet indésirable médicamenteux en service de gériatrie aiguë.

Fall is one of the five main causes of drug-related hospital admissions (DRA) in France. A standardized chart review method, to identify DRA adapted to elderly patients, has recently been developed by Thevelin et al. Our first aim was to assess the reliability of this method for detecting DRA for falls in elderly subjects. Our second aim was to assess the feasibility of this method and to evaluate its reliability for assessing causality, the contribution of DRA to hospitalization, and the avoidability of DRAs in elderly patients hospitalized for a medication-related fall. A retrospective observational study was conducted on 16 patient cases admitted to the hospital for falls in May 2022, in the geriatric department of a French university hospital. Six healthcare professionals (pharmacists, pharmacologists, and geriatricians) assessed a method for detecting DRA individually and then in multidisciplinary pairs of raters. Inter-rater agreement (individually and in pairs) was assessed for DRA detection, causality, avoidability, and contribution of the DRA to hospitalization. A κ > 0,4 was considered a satisfactory threshold for agreement. The mean age was 86 years. When the assessment was done individually, detection of DRA-related hospitalizations (κ = 0,46; p < ,001), and DRA contribution to hospitalization (κ = 0,50; p < ,001) were moderately concordant. The causality assessment (κ = 0,09; p = 0,24) did not agree, and the avoidability assessment (κ = 0,63; p < ,001) agreed substantially. When the evaluation was done in pairs, detection of DRA-related hospitalizations (κ = 0,47; p < ,001) was moderately concordant between pairs. Avoidability assessment (κ = 0,79; p < ,001) concurred substantially. The assessment of causality (κ = 0,29; p = 0,01) and DRA contribution to hospitalization (κ = 0,38; p < .001) agreed fairly well. This study validated, individually and in pairs, the reliability of the method to identify DRA in the context of falls. This method will be of great use in research and epidemiological studies.