Maximum acceptable forces for repetitive ulnar deviation of the wrist.

The purpose of this experiment was to quantify maximum acceptable forces for ulnar deviation motions of the wrist at various repetition rates. Subjects grasped a handle with a power grip and moved it through a 1.40 rad (80 degrees) ulnar deviation wrist motion (similar to a knife cutting task). A psychophysical methodology was used in which the subject adjusted the resistance on the handle and the experiment manipulated or controlled all other variables. Two series of experiments were conducted. Thirteen subjects completed the first series, which investigated repetition rates of 15 and 20 motions per minute. Eleven subjects completed the second series, which investigated 15, 20, and 25 motions per minute. Subjects performed for 7 hours per day, 5 days per week, for 4 weeks in the first series and 5 weeks in the second series. The subjects were instructed to work as if they were on an incentive basis, getting paid for the amount of work they performed. Symptoms were recorded by the subjects during the last 5 minutes of each hour. The results are presented and compared with maximum acceptable forces for wrist flexion and extension.

Psychophysical studies of repetitive wrist flexion and extension.

The purpose of this experiment was to investigate the feasibility of using psychophysical methods to determine maximum acceptable forces for various types and frequencies of repetitive wrist motion. Four adjustable work stations were built to simulate repetitive wrist flexion with a power grip, wrist flexion with a pinch grip, and wrist extension with a power grip. The study consisted of two separate experiments. Subjects worked for two days per week during the first experiment, and five days per week during the second experiment. Fifteen women completed the first experiment, working seven hours each day, two days per week, for 20 days. Repetition rates of 2, 5, 10, 15 and 20 motions per minute were used with each flexion and extension task. Maximum acceptable torques were determined for the various motions, grips, and repetition rates without dramatic changes in wrist strength, tactile sensitivity, or number of symptoms. Fourteen different women completed the second experiment, performing a wrist flexion motion (power grip) fifteen times per minute, seven hours per day, five days per week, for 23 days. There were no significant differences in maximum acceptable torque from day to day. However, the average maximum acceptable torque for a five days per week exposure was 36.3% lower than for the same task performed two days per week. Assuming that maximum acceptable torques decrease 36.3% for other repetition rates and motions, tables of maximum acceptable force were developed for female wrist flexion (power grip), female wrist flexion (pinch grip), and female wrist extension (power grip).

A review of machine-guarding recommendations.

A series of machine-guarding drawings were developed during the 1940s, which represent the relationship between gap size and safe distance. Since the development of these drawings, larger and more comprehensive anthropometric surveys have been conducted, but they have never been compared with the drawings. The purpose of this investigation was to determine whether these original recommendations presented in the drawings are still consistent with data in the larger anthropometric surveys, especially relating to women and minorities, who are now much more prevalent in the American workplace. In this study, data from six anthropometric surveys were compared with the original machine-guarding recommendations. To minimize the percentage of the population at risk, the length dimensions were chosen from the 99th percentile male population, and thickness dimensions were chosen from the 1st percentile female population. Many of these recommendations were found to be valid, although several important modifications were suggested. Several currently recommended dimensions show no correlation to the incompressible joints utilized in this study, and it is recommended that they be eliminated. The recommendations are presented in tables of maximum gap size and minimum distance.