Consensus Recommendations for the Use of Simulation in Therapeutic Patient Education.

INTRODUCTION: Simulation is rarely used to help individuals with chronic diseases develop skills. The aim of the study was to provide recommendations for the use of simulation in therapeutic patient education (S-TPE). METHODS: Expert consensus was achieved with the participation of the following 3 groups of experts: (a) expert patients and caregivers; (b) health professionals specialized in therapeutic patient education (TPE); and (c) simulation experts. Each expert received a list of questions by e-mail in 3 iterations. The synthesis of the 2 first questionnaires resulted in 34 first recommendations voted during the consensus conference meeting. Each recommendation was subject to an extensive literature review. The quality of the evidence and the strength of the recommendations were assessed through the evaluation, development, and evaluation criteria categories (GRADE criteria). The third questionnaire selected and illustrated recommendations more specific to the use of S-TPE. RESULTS: At the end of the process, the experts identified 26 recommendations specific to the use of S-TPE. They proposed examples of skills in different diseases and stressed the importance of adapting the conditions of use (location, equipment, time of the care) to the circumstances of the patient learner and skills to be developed. Experts should exercise great caution as this technique presents ethical considerations related to patient care. CONCLUSIONS: These recommendations underline the fact that simulation could bring added value to TPE. They provide a framework and examples for the experimental use of simulation in TPE. Research into feasibility and acceptability is needed.

A longitudinal study of coping, anxiety and glycemic control in adults with type 1 diabetes.

Diabetes is a unique disorder in how much it requires a high degree of individual self management strategies. Anxiety and stress can affect glycemic control, and thus management of emotions may be key to good glycemic control. This study is the first to examine how anxiety and coping style, and their interaction, can affect long-term glycemic control. We measured anxiety, coping, and HbA1C, a measure for mean blood glucose levels in the previous 6-8 weeks, in 115 patients with Type 1 diabetes at baseline and roughly 5 years later. We found that coping predicted outcomes, especially for those high in trait anxiety. Trait anxiety predicted limited increases in HbA1C (mean increase = 0.02%). Lower levels of emotion-oriented coping predicted clinically significant increases in HbA1C, but only for those high on baseline trait anxiety (mean increase = 0.92%). Task-oriented coping predicted decreases in state anxiety. Use of task- and emotion-oriented coping appears especially important for highly anxious patients, both for emotional regulation and glycemic control. So, coping styles, basal anxiety and their interactions should be considered in designing follow-up and interventions with diabetic patients.

Predictive value for disease progression of serum thyroglobulin levels measured in the postoperative period and after (131)I ablation therapy in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer.

UNLABELLED: The aim of our study was to evaluate and compare in thyroid cancer patients the predictive value for disease progression of thyroglobulin (Tg) levels measured under thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) stimulation, in the postoperative period just before (131)I ablative therapy and at the time of control 6-12 mo later. METHODS: Two-hundred twelve consecutive patients treated for a well-differentiated thyroid carcinoma (184 papillary, 28 follicular) with no initial distant metastases were retrospectively studied. All patients had a total or near-total thyroidectomy followed by ablation with 3.7 GBq (131)I. Tg levels were determined just before ablative therapy (Tg1) and 6-12 mo later (Tg2). Thresholds of 30 and 10 ng/mL were used for Tg1 and Tg2, respectively. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess the predictive value for disease progression of the 2 Tg determinations. RESULTS: Thirty patients had a Tg1 level > 30 ng/mL. Six to 12 mo later, 30 patients had a Tg2 level > 10 ng/mL, 19 of whom had initially a Tg1 level > 30 ng/mL. Disease progression was reported in 20 patients (9%). Progression-free survival rates were significantly lower in patients with a low Tg1 or Tg2 level but the difference was more important with Tg2. With univariate analysis, 5 variables were significantly associated with disease progression: Tg2, Tg1, node invasion, extrathyroidal extension, and tumor size. With multivariate analysis, only Tg2 (odds ratio [OR] = 16.4; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] = 5.7-47.4; P < 0.001) and node invasion (OR = 2.7; 95% CI = 1.0-7.2; P = 0.04) had an independent prognostic value. When only initial parameters were considered, Tg1 and node invasion were the 2 independent prognostic factors. The OR decreased for Tg1 (OR = 10.1; 95% CI = 4.0-25.7; P < 0.001) but increased for node invasion (OR = 4.4; 95% CI = 1.7-11.2; P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Among all clinical and tumoral variables, lymph node invasion and serum Tg level are 2 important parameters to define the risk of disease progression. Although Tg2 appears more significant than Tg1, both Tg levels measured under TSH stimulation, in the postoperative period and a few months after ablative therapy, have a predictive value. In clinical practice, patients at risk can be selected as soon as the initial lymph node status and Tg1 level are known.