Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Environ Monit Assess ; 81(1-3): 301-12, 2003.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12620023

RESUMO

Three methods (membrane filtration, multiple tube fermentation, and chromogenic substrate technology kits manufactured by IDEXX Laboratories, Inc.) are routinely used to measure indicator bacteria for beach water quality. To assess comparability of these methods, quantify within-laboratory variability for each method, and place that variability into context of variability among laboratories using the same method, 22 southern California laboratories participated in a series of intercalibration exercises. Each laboratory processed three to five replicates from thirteen samples, with total coliforms, fecal coliforms or enterococci measured depending on the sample. Results were generally comparable among methods, though membrane filtration appeared to underestimate the other two methods for fecal coliforms, possibly due to clumping. Variability was greatest for the multiple tube fermentation method. For all three methods, within laboratory variability was greater than among laboratories variability.


Assuntos
Monitoramento Ambiental/métodos , Poluentes da Água/análise , Calibragem , California , Meio Ambiente , Fermentação , Filtração , Controle de Qualidade , Valores de Referência
2.
J Water Health ; 1(1): 23-31, 2003 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15384270

RESUMO

Two regional studies conducted during dry weather demonstrated that the Southern California Bight (SCB) shoreline has good water quality, except near areas that drain land-based runoff. Here, we repeat those regional studies 36 h after a rainstorm to assess the influence of runoff under high flow conditions. Two hundred and fifty-four shoreline sites between Santa Barbara, California and Ensenada, Mexico were sampled using a stratified-random sampling design with four strata: sandy beaches, rocky shoreline, shoreline adjacent to urban runoff outlets that flow intermittently, and shoreline adjacent to outlets that flow year-round. Each site was sampled for total coliforms, fecal coliforms (or E. coli), and enterococci. Sixty percent of the shoreline failed water quality standards after the storm compared to only 6% during dry weather. Failure of water quality standards increased to more than 90% for shoreline areas adjacent to urban runoff outlets. During dry weather, most water quality failures occurred for only one of the three bacterial indicators and concentrations were barely above State of California standards; following the storm, most failures were for multiple indicators and exceeded State of California standards by a large margin. The condition of the shoreline in Mexico and the United States was similar following rainfall, which was not the case during dry weather.


Assuntos
Praias , Fezes/microbiologia , Sedimentos Geológicos/microbiologia , Água do Mar/microbiologia , Microbiologia da Água , Poluentes Químicos da Água/análise , California , Enterococcus/isolamento & purificação , Monitoramento Ambiental/métodos , Escherichia coli/isolamento & purificação , Humanos , Prevenção Primária/métodos , Chuva , Projetos de Pesquisa , Medição de Risco , Estações do Ano , Fatores de Tempo , Movimentos da Água
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA