The Leu7Pro polymorphism of the signal peptide of neuropeptide Y (NPY) gene is associated with increased levels of inflammatory markers preceding vascular complications in patients with type 2 diabetes.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: The Leucine7 to Proline7 (Leu7Pro) polymorphism of the signal peptide of neuropeptide Y (NPY) increases risk for vascular complications in diabetes. Diabetes is associated with low-grade inflammation, which has an important role in the development of atherosclerosis. Currently, we followed diabetes patients to investigate, if the Pro7 allele is associated with the inflammation related to atherosclerosis. METHODS: In the 5-year follow-up, the genotyped, pair-matched type 2 diabetes patients (12 with the Pro7 allele and 19 without) were investigated using non-invasive ultrasound based methods to measure the development of atherosclerosis (intima media thickness=IMT) and endothelium-dependent (FMD) and -independent nitrate-mediated (NMD) vasodilatation. The development of diabetic complications was followed annually, and the concentrations of inflammatory markers and NPY in plasma were determined. RESULTS: Patients with the Pro7 had increased U-albumin/creatinine (p=0.037), E-selectin (p=0.016), fasting insulin (p=0.011) and HOMA index (p=0.013) but decreased serum amyloid P concentrations (p=0.021). Furthermore, men with the Pro7 had increased CRP (p=0.010) and NPY (p=0.026) concentrations. IMT and FMD were similar in all patients, however, NMD decreased more during the follow-up in the patients with the Pro7 (p=0.002). NPY correlated positively with bIMT [r 0.04 (SE 0.02), p=0.007] and E-selectin negatively with FMD [r -0.05 (S.E 0.02), p=0.039]. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATIONS: Diabetes patients with the Pro7 allele display increased levels of inflammatory molecules and NPY in blood, preceding vascular wall thickening and impaired endothelial dilatation, especially in male patients.

The Leu7Pro polymorphism of neuropeptide Y is associated with younger age of onset of type 2 diabetes mellitus and increased risk for nephropathy in subjects with diabetic retinopathy.

Several studies have shown genetic predisposition for diabetic complications. The leucine7 to proline7 (Leu7Pro) polymorphism of preproNPY has been shown to be a risk factor for diabetic retinopathy in type 1 diabetes. In the current study we examined the contribution of this polymorphism on the progression of retinopathy in Caucasian type 1 and type 2 diabetes patients. Patients with type 2 diabetes and the Leu7Pro polymorphism developed retinopathy at younger age because of markedly earlier disease onset of diabetes (RC- 6.8, 95% CI-12.2 - [- 1.5]), but no association of the Leu7Pro polymorphism with the current severity of retinopathy was detected. A strong association of the polymorphism with proteinuria in type 2 diabetes patients with retinopathy could be detected (OR 3.1, 95% CI 1.1-8.8); 31% of subjects having both retinopathy and proteinuria had the polymorphism compared to only 13% of retinopathy patents without concomitant proteinuria (p = 0.032). Plasma concentrations of NPY were increased in subjects with proteinuria (79.2+/-28.4 and 64.7+/-26.2 pmol/l, p = 0.001). These results suggest that the Leu7Pro polymorphism could be used to predict earlier onset of type 2 diabetes and retinopathy, and increased risk for diabetic nephropathy.

The Finnish evidence-based guideline for open-angle glaucoma.

In most patients, chronic open-angle glaucoma is a slowly progressive disease. Eyes with very high intraocular pressure (IOP > 30 mmHg) represent an exception to this and should be treated and followed extremely intensively. As lowering IOP is, so far, the only means of treating glaucoma, the majority of research reports deal with the IOP-lowering effect of the treatment. The primary goal of treatment, however, is to prevent glaucomatous damage to the structures and function of the eye. The effectiveness of treatment is monitored with optic disc and retinal nerve fibre layer imaging and with visual field examinations. If the glaucomatous changes are progressing, more effective treatment should be given. In the course of follow-up, it should be noted that the changes in the optic nerve structure and function appear and progress at different time-points with delays of up to several years. The assessment of abnormalities is dependent on the examination method and requires a great deal of experience on the part of the examiner. The important risk factors in glaucoma are elevated IOP (even if IOP is within normal range in half of patients ), age, positive family history, exfoliation, race and myopia.

Localised changes in glaucomatous visual fields after trabeculectomy.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Modern techniques of automated perimetry have shown that surgical reduction of intraocular pressure (IOP) may have a beneficial effect on the glaucomatous visual field. The purpose of the present study was to analyse and quantify the changes in the visual fields of glaucoma patients after trabeculectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Octopus visual fields of twenty-seven glaucoma patients were analysed. Change in visual field mean sensitivity (MS) was calculated to detect total field changes. A clinical and a statistical analysis of small clusters of test points were used to define whether local changes had occurred. RESULTS: MS in the operated eyes improved significantly from 16.4+/-5.6 to 18.2+/-5.5 dB. The patients had on average 3.9+/-6.2 clusters where the retinal sensitivity had improved at least 5 dB and only 0.4+/-0.9 clusters where sensitivity had deteriorated at least 5 dB after trabeculectomy. 17 patients had more improved than deteriorated clusters postoperatively. CONCLUSION: Statistically significant improvement was seen in the MS, but improvement was also found in small local areas of the visual fields after trabeculectomy.

Plasma concentration of topically applied betaxolol in elderly glaucoma patients.

Our aim was to study the concentration of betaxolol in plasma after its topical ocular use during the normal 12 hr dosing interval. Twenty microliters of betaxolol 0.5% solution were applied into both eyes of nine glaucoma patients, and the plasma concentrations of the drug were measured 12 hr thereafter using a radioreceptor assay. The same amount of betaxolol was then applied ocularly, and its concentration in plasma was measured at 5, 10, 15, 30 min and 1, 2, 4 and 8 hr thereafter. The mean (SD) concentration of betaxolol in plasma twelve hr after the first dose was 0.4 (0.2) ng/ml. After the second dose, the patients showed a biphasic concentration vs. time curve, the first peak occurring at 8 (4) min, and the second peak at 210 (132) min; the mean (SD) peak concentrations being 1.1 (0.3) and 2.0 (1.1) ng/ml, respectively. The area under the concentration vs. time curve showed a 4-fold variation among our patients. Topically applied betaxolol was rapidly absorbed into systemic circulation, and concentrations were detectable even at 12 hr. The interindividual variation in the systemic absorption of betaxolol was large.

The favorable effect of topical betaxolol and timolol on glaucomatous visual fields: a 2-year follow-up study.

BACKGROUND: It has been suggested that beta-adrenergic antagonists might have mechanisms of action other than ocular hypotensive effects affecting the visual function in glaucoma patients and that betaxolol might protect the visual field better than others. A randomized, double-blind study was conducted to compare the effects of betaxolol and timolol on visual fields of glaucoma patients. METHODS: Sixty-four glaucoma patients were treated with either 0.5% betaxolol or 0.25% timolol eyedrops twice daily. The Octopus visual field performance was followed up for 2 years and analyzed to find diffuse and localized changes. We analyzed the change in the mean sensitivity (MS) and performed a cluster analysis and clinical assessment of the visual fields in both treatment groups. RESULTS: The mean sensitivity (MS) improved significantly and equally in both treatment groups. There was a tendency towards more improved clusters in the betaxolol group than in the timolol group and more worsened cluster in the timolol group than in the betaxolol group, but the difference was not statistically significant. The clinical assessment also showed no statistically significant difference between the two groups. CONCLUSION: In the present study both betaxolol and timolol had a favorable effect on the visual fields of glaucoma patients. There was no statistically significant difference between betaxolol- and timolol-treated patients either in the change in mean retinal sensitivity or in the change in localized scotomatous areas.

Aqueous humour concentration and the intraocular pressure-lowering effect of topical betaxolol before cataract surgery.

OBJECTIVE: The aim was to study the relationship between aqueous humour betaxolol concentration and intraocular pressure (IOP). METHODS: In this double-blind, randomized study, we administered betaxolol (a) or placebo (b) ocularly to 131 patients scheduled for cataract surgery. The patients were randomly divided into ten groups. In groups 1a and 1b, the drug was scheduled to be instilled 1-2 h, in groups 2a and 2b 12 h, in groups 3a and 3b 24 h, and in groups 4a and 4b 48 h before surgery. The pupil was dilated in all eyes prior to surgery. The IOP was measured with Perkins' applanation tonometer before the instillation of the drug and just before the peribulbar block. Twenty microlitres of 0.5% betaxolol or placebo solution was instilled into the eye. IOP was also measured before instillation of the drug and after 1 2 h in undilated eyes of 20 patients, whose contralateral eye was to be operated on, to rule out the effect of pupil dilation on IOP (groups 5a and 5b). Aqueous humour betaxolol concentrations were analysed using a radioreceptor assay. RESULTS: Betaxolol did not decrease IOP significantly in eyes with pupillary dilation. Both betaxolol and placebo decreased IOP significantly in patients without pupillary dilation, the effect of betaxolol being slightly more pronounced. The betaxolol concentration in aqueous humour was 731 ng m-1 in group la, 2.4 h after drug instillation. Measurable concentrations of betaxolol were also detected in aqueous humour in group 4a 47.7 h after drug administration. CONCLUSION: No correlation between aqueous humour concentration of betaxolol and the effect on IOP was found in eyes where the pupil was dilated before surgery. A single betaxolol dose did not decrease IOP significantly in patients undergoing cataract surgery, but the IOP decreasing effect was, however, clearly seen in patients who did not receive mydriatic drugs. The routine use of topical betaxolol prior to cataract surgery to decrease IOP is not recommended.