Heparins Sourced From Bovine and Porcine Mucosa Gain Exclusive Monographs in the Brazilian Pharmacopeia.

Most of the unfractionated heparin (UFH) consumed worldwide is manufactured using porcine mucosa as raw material (HPI); however, some countries also employ products sourced from bovine mucosa (HBI) as interchangeable versions of the gold standard HPI. Although accounted as a single UFH, HBI, and HPI have differing anticoagulant activities (~100 and 200 IU mg-1, respectively) because of their compositional dissimilarities. The concomitant use of HBI and HPI in Brazil had already provoked serious bleeding incidents, which led to the withdrawal of HBI products in 2009. In 2010, the Brazilian Pharmacopeia (BP) formed a special committee to develop two complementary monographs approaching HBI and HPI separately, as distinct active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs). The committee has rapidly agreed on requirements concerning the composition and presence of contaminants based on nuclear magnetic resonance and anion-exchange chromatography. On the other hand, consensus on the anticoagulant activity of HBI was the subject of long and intense discussions. Nevertheless, the committee has ultimately agreed to recommend minimum anti-FIIa activities of 100 IU mg-1 for HBI and 180 IU mg-1 for HPI. Upon the approval by the Brazilian Health Authority (ANVISA), the BP published the new monographs for HPI and HBI APIs in 2016 and 2017, respectively. These pioneer monographs represent a pivotal step toward the safest use of HBI and HPI as interchangeable anticoagulants and serve as a valuable template for the reformulation of pharmacopeias of other countries willing to introduce HBI.

Converting the Distinct Heparins Sourced from Bovine or Porcine Mucosa into a Single Anticoagulant Drug.

Unfractionated heparin (UFH) and their low-molecular-weight derivatives are sourced almost exclusively from porcine mucosa (HPI); however, a worldwide introduction of UFH from bovine mucosa (HBI) has been recommended to reinforce the currently unsteady supply chain of heparin products. Although HBI has different chemical composition and about half of the anticoagulant potency of HPI (∼100 and ∼180 international unit [IU]/mg, respectively), they have been employed as interchangeable UFHs in some countries since the 1990s. However, their use as a single drug provoked several bleeding incidents in Brazil, which precipitated the publication of the first monographs exclusive for HBI and HPI by the Brazilian Pharmacopoeia. Nevertheless, we succeed in producing with high-resolution anion-exchange chromatography a novel HBI derivative with anticoagulant potency (200 IU/mg), disaccharide composition (enriched in N,6-disulfated α-glucosamine) and safety profile (bleeding and heparin-induced thrombocytopaenia potentials and protamine neutralization) similar to those seen in the gold standard HPI. Therefore, we show that it is possible to equalize the composition and pharmacological characteristics of these distinct UFHs by employing an easily implementable improvement in the HBI manufacturing.

Heparin from bovine intestinal mucosa: glycans with multiple sulfation patterns and anticoagulant effects.

Pharmaceutical grade heparins from porcine intestine and bovine lung consist mainly of repeating tri-sulfated units, of the disaccharide →4-α-IdoA2S-1→4-α-GlcNS6S-1→. Heparin preparations from bovine intestine, in contrast, are more heterogeneous. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and disaccharide analysis after heparinase digestions show that heparin from bovine intestine contains α-glucosamine with significant substitutive variations: 64% are 6-O-sulfated and N -sulfated, as in porcine intestinal heparin while 36% are 6-desulfated. Desulfated α-iduronic acid units are contained in slightly lower proportions in bovine than in porcine heparin. NMR data also indicate N-, 3- and 6-trisulfated α-glucosamine (lower proportions) and α-GlcNS-1→4-α-GlcA and α-IdoA2S-1→4-α-GlcNAc (higher amounts) in bovine than in porcine heparin. Porcine and bovine heparins can be fractionated by anion exchange chromatography into three fractions containing different substitutions on the α-glucosamine units. Each individual fraction shows close disaccharide composition and anticoagulant activity, regardless of their origin (bovine or porcine intestine). However, these two heparins differ markedly in the proportions of the three fractions. Interestingly, fractions with the typical heparin disaccharides of porcine intestine are present in bovine intestinal heparin. These fractions contain high in vitro anticoagulant activity, reduced antithrombotic effect and high bleeding tendency. These observations indicate that the prediction of haemostatic effects of heparin preparations cannot rely exclusively on structural analysis and anticoagulant assays in vitro . Minor structural components may account for variations on in vivo effects. In conclusion, we suggest that pharmaceutical grade bovine intestinal heparin, even after purification procedures, is not an equivalent drug to porcine intestinal heparin.

Propositional debate on biosimilar enoxaparin in Brazil.

Some patents of low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) have expired and others are about to expire. Biosimilar versions of those drugs are available for clinical use in several countries. However, skepticism persists about the possibility of obtaining preparations similar to the original drug, because of the complexity of the process to generate LMWHs. In recent years, our laboratory has analyzed biosimilar samples of enoxaparin available for clinical use in Brazil (30 different batches and 70 finished products). Those preparations were assessed regarding their chemical structure, molecular weight distribution, in vitro anticoagulant activity, and pharmacological effects in animal models of thrombosis and bleeding. Our results have clearly shown that biosimilar preparations of enoxaparin are similar to the original drug. Our results have shown that those biosimilar versions of enoxaparin are a valid therapeutic alternative, which are, however, in need of appropriate regulation to ensure compliance with regulatory requirements.

Structure and haemostatic effects of generic versions of enoxaparin available for clinical use in Brazil: similarity to the original drug.

Patent protection for enoxaparin has expired. Generic preparations are developed and approved for clinical use in different countries. However, there is still skepticism about the possibility of making an exact copy of the original drug due to the complex processes involved in generating low-molecular-weight heparins. We have undertaken a careful analysis of generic versions of enoxaparin available for clinical use in Brazil. Thirty-three batches of active ingredient and 70 of the final pharmaceutical product were obtained from six different suppliers. They were analysed for their chemical composition, molecular size distribution, in vitro anticoagulant activity and pharmacological effects on animal models of experimental thrombosis and bleeding. Clearly, the generic versions of enoxaparin available for clinical use in Brazil are similar to the original drug. Only three out of 33 batches of active ingredient from one supplier showed differences in molecular size distribution, resulting from a low percentage of tetrasaccharide or the presence of a minor component eluted as monosaccharide. Three out of 70 batches of the final pharmaceutical products contained lower amounts of the active ingredient than that declared by the suppliers. Our results suggest that the generic versions of enoxaparin are a viable therapeutic option, but their use requires strict regulations to ensure accurate standards.

Debate propositivo sobre os biossimilares de enoxaparina no Brasil / Propositional debate on biosimilar enoxaparin in Brazil / Debate de una propuesta sobre los biosimilares de enoxaparina en Brasil

Algumas patentes das heparinas de baixo peso molecular expiraram e outras estão vencendo. Versões biossimilares desses fármacos estão disponíveis para o uso clínico em vários países. Entretanto, ainda persiste ceticismo sobre a possibilidade de se obter preparações semelhantes ao medicamento original em razão do complexo processo para gerar heparina de baixo peso molecular. Nosso laboratório analisou, nos últimos anos, amostras de enoxaparina disponíveis para uso clínico no Brasil. Já analisamos 30 lotes distintos e 70 produtos acabados. Essas preparações foram avaliadas quanto à estrutura química, distribuição de peso molecular, atividade anticoagulante in vitro e efeitos farmacológicos em modelos animais de trombose e sangramento. Claramente, nossos resultados indicam que as preparações biossimilares de enoxaparina são semelhantes ao medicamento original. Nossos resultados indicam que essas versões biossimilares de enoxaparina são uma alternativa terapêutica válida, mas que requerem regulamentação adequada para assegurar o atendimento de requisitos regulatórios apropriados.

Some patents of low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) have expired and others are about to expire. Biosimilar versions of those drugs are available for clinical use in several countries. However, skepticism persists about the possibility of obtaining preparations similar to the original drug, because of the complexity of the process to generate LMWHs. In recent years, our laboratory has analyzed biosimilar samples of enoxaparin available for clinical use in Brazil (30 different batches and 70 finished products). Those preparations were assessed regarding their chemical structure, molecular weight distribution, in vitro anticoagulant activity, and pharmacological effects in animal models of thrombosis and bleeding. Our results have clearly shown that biosimilar preparations of enoxaparin are similar to the original drug. Our results have shown that those biosimilar versions of enoxaparin are a valid therapeutic alternative, which are, however, in need of appropriate regulation to ensure compliance with regulatory requirements.

Algunas patentes de las heparinas de bajo peso molecular caducaron y otras van por el mismo camino. Versiones biosimilares de esos fármacos están disponibles para el uso clínico en varios países. Sin embargo, todavía persiste el escepticismo sobre la posibilidad de obtener preparaciones similares al medicamento original en razón del complejo proceso para producir la heparina de bajo peso molecular. En los últimos años, nuestro laboratorio analizó muestras de enoxaparina disponibles para el uso clínico en Brasil. Ya hemos analizado 30 lotes distintos y 70 productos acabados. Esas preparaciones fueron evaluadas en cuanto a la estructura química, distribución de peso molecular, actividad anticoagulante in vitro y efectos farmacológicos en modelos animales de trombosis y sangramiento. Lógicamente que nuestros resultados indican que las preparaciones biosimilares de enoxaparina son similares al medicamento original. Nuestros resultados dan fe de que esas versiones biosimilares de enoxaparina son una alternativa terapéutica válida, pero que requieren una reglamentación adecuada para garantizar la atención de los requisitos reglamentarios pertinentes.

Heparins from porcine and bovine intestinal mucosa: Are they similar drugs?

Increasing reports of bleeding and peri- or post-operative blood dyscrasias in Brazil were possibly associated with the use of heparin from bovine instead of porcine intestine. These two pharmaceutical grade heparins were analysed for potential differences. NMR analyses confirmed that porcine heparin is composed of mainly trisulfated disaccharides -->4-alpha-IdoA2S-1-->4-alpha-GlcNS6S-1-->. Heparin from bovine intestine is also composed of highly 2-sulfated alpha-iduronic acid residues, but the sulfation of the alpha-glucosamine units vary significantly: approximately 50% are 6- and N -disulfated, as in porcine heparin, while approximately 36% are 6-desulfated and approximately 14% N -acetylated. These heparins differ significantly in their effects on coagulation, thrombosis and bleeding. Bovine heparin acts mostly through factor Xa. Compared to porcine heparin on a weight basis, bovine heparin exhibited approximately half of the anticoagulant and antithrombotic effects, but similar effect on bleeding. These two heparins also differ in their protamine neutralisation curves. The doses of heparin from bovine intestine required for effective antithrombotic protection and the production of adverse bleeding effects are closer than those for porcine heparin. This observation may explain the increasing bleeding observed among Brazilian patients. Our results suggest that these two types of heparin are not equivalent drugs.