RESUMO
PURPOSE: We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of an adult-based adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer program by assessing patient satisfaction and whether programming offers added incremental benefit beyond primary oncology providers (POP) to address their needs. METHODS: A modified validated survey was used to ask two questions: (1) rate on a 10-point Likert scale their level of satisfaction with the information provided to them by their POP and (2) did the AYA consult provide added value on top of their POP. Young people at PM were recruited over two separate time points spaced 1 year apart. Descriptive statistics was used to report demographics and survey responses. Differences in demographics between cohorts 1 and 2 were compared using Student's t-tests. RESULTS: Participants were an average of 31 years (range 15-39) of age; (Cohort 1 = 137; Cohort 2 = 130) and were dominated by diagnoses of leukemia, lymphoma, and breast cancer. More patients had a consultation with the AYA program in 2016 (Cohort 2 = 55/130, 42%) compared to 2015 (Cohort 1 = 34/137, 25%, p = 0.026). Mean satisfaction scores (±SD) with information provided by POP in AYA domains in both cohorts combined were highest among (1) cancer information (8.09 ± 2.22), (2) social supports (7.45 ± 2.52), and (3) school/work (7.42 ± 2.88). When evaluating the incremental benefit of the AYA-dedicated team, statistically significant added value was perceived in 5/10 domains, including school/work (p < 0.001), social supports (p < 0.001), physical appearance (p = 0.009), sexual health (p = 0.01), and fertility (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Participants were satisfied with the information provided by their POP and still declared incremental added benefit of the AYA program. Cancer centers should continue to advocate for AYA focused programming with ongoing evaluation.
Assuntos
Assistência ao Paciente/métodos , Apoio Social , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
PURPOSE: Although cancer clinical trials (CT) offer opportunities for novel treatments that may lead to improved outcomes, adolescents and young adults (AYA) are less likely to participate in these trials as compared to younger children and older adults. We aimed to identify the perceptions and attitudes toward CT in AYA that influence trial participation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review of cancer literature was conducted that assessed perceptions and attitudes toward CT enrollment limited to AYA patients (defined as age 15-39). We estimated the frequency of identified themes by pooling identified studies. RESULTS: In total, six original research articles were identified that specifically addressed perceptions or attitudes that influenced CT participation in AYA patients. Three studies were conducted at pediatric centers - one at an AYA unit, one at an adult cancer hospital, and one was registry based. Major themes identified for CT acceptability included: hope for positive clinical affect, altruism, and having autonomy. Potential deterrents included: prolonged hospitalization, worry of side effects, and discomfort with experimentation. CONCLUSION: Limited information is available with regard to the perceptions and attitudes toward CT acceptability among AYA patients, especially those treated at adult cancer centers, which prevents generalization of data and themes. Future research assessing strategies for understanding and supporting CT decision-making processes among AYA represents a key focus for future funding to improve CT enrollment.
RESUMO
Physicians from 6 non-oncology pediatric subspecialties were surveyed about fertility preservation (FP) to assess education/service needs. Almost all (96%; 25 of 26) reported having patients at risk of infertility; however, only 58% (15 of 26) had discussed FP with patients' families. Most subspecialists (92%; 23 of 25) would like access to an FP program. Our data support exploring the expansion of FP programs beyond oncology.
