Cold hypersensitivity after hand injuries. A prospective 7-year follow-up.

We studied changes in cold hypersensitivity from 3 to 7 years following severe hand injuries. Data was collected using postal questionnaires 7 years after injury in 71 patients who had participated in a 3-year follow-up from the time of injury. There was no change in cold sensitivity measured using the McCabe Cold Sensitivity Severity scale (CSS) from 3 to 7 years after injury. However, there was a trend toward decreased severity measured using a five-level scale of self-reported cold hypersensitivity. Compared to the 3-year follow-up, fewer respondents rated their condition as severe and two patients had recovered from their cold hypersensitivity at the 7-year follow-up. Furthermore, 21 (30%) of the respondents stated a decrease in cold hypersensitivity during the last 2 years. Limitations in cold associated activities and the importance of being less limited in leisure activities (NRS 0-10) did not change between the two follow-ups. In conclusion, the CSS-scores did not change from 3 to 7 years after injury. Several patients experienced improvements in cold hypersensitivity, but few recovered completely from the condition.

Evaluation of a home treatment program for cold hypersensitivity using a classical conditioning procedure in patients with hand and arm injuries.

STUDY DESIGN: Case series. INTRODUCTION: A home treatment program using a classical conditioning procedure to decrease cold hypersensitivity has potential to reduce symptoms. PURPOSE: To evaluate a home treatment program for cold hypersensitivity using a classical conditioning procedure in patients who are cold hypersensitive after hand and arm injuries. METHODS: A series of 22 patients followed a classical conditioning procedure consisting of exposing the body to cold outdoor temperatures and immersing the hands in warm water, every other day, for five weeks. The McCabe Cold Sensitivity Severity scale (CSS) was used to measure cold hypersensitivity twice before treatment, at four weeks, and at one year after treatment; Likert scales was used for the patients ratings of improvements. A cold stress test was performed to evaluate rewarming capacity in injured fingers. RESULTS: From the 20 patients, who returned questionnaires at all assessment points, 9 reported a small and three reported a moderate improvement in cold hypersensitivity after treatment. There was a trend toward improvement in the CSS (median 36; interquartile range--19 to 60) and in the rewarming pattern of fingers that were initially slow to rewarm. The improvements were sustained or increased at one-year follow-up. CONCLUSION: These preliminary results suggest that the classical conditioning procedure to treat cold hypersensitivity has potential and should be further explored in a trial with more rigorous design.

Small-to-moderate decreases in cold hypersensitivity up to 3 years after severe hand injuries: A prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The natural course and predictors for decreased cold hypersensitivity were studied in 85 patients with severe hand injuries involving nerve lesions. METHODS: Questionnaires including the McCabe Cold Sensitivity Severity scale (CSS 0-400) were collected after injury, and at 6-month, 12-month, 2-year, and 3-year follow-ups. RESULTS: Between the 12-month and 3-year follow-up, there was a small decrease in cold hypersensitivity as measured by the CSS (median = 24; Q1-Q3 = -11-75; n = 85). Five of the patients recovered from cold hypersensitivity, and ∼ 40% of the patients were less affected by cold hypersensitivity in daily life. Little or no pain early after injury and higher CSS-scores 12 months after primary surgery were weakly associated with the reduced CSS-scores (R(2) = 0.20) at the 3-year follow-up. Six patients had changed work or did not work due to cold hypersensitivity, but the majority of the patients had kept their cold-exposed work. CONCLUSION: Cold-hypersensitive patients may have a reasonable chance for decreased cold sensitivity and cold-associated activity limitations over time, although the majority of the patients will experience persistent problems. Tools to predict improvement remain insufficient.

Cold hypersensitivity 6 to 10 years after replantation or revascularisation of fingers: consequences for work and leisure activities.

We investigated cold hypersensitivity and activity in 81 adults (male/female 76/5), 6 to 10 years after finger replantation/revascularisation (mean age at injury 43 (SD 15) years). Questionnaires included the McCabe Cold Sensitivity Severity Scale, Potential Work-Exposure Scale and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score. Eighty per cent of the respondents were cold hypersensitive; 20% were severely or extremely cold hypersensitive. Of the 74 patients employed at injury, 7% had changed work and 4% were not working due to cold hypersensitivity. The median score for cold exposure at work at follow-up was 153 (scale 0-300). The correlation between cold sensitivity and DASH work was low. One-third of the respondents experienced limitations in their leisure activities because of cold complaints. Long-term cold sensitivity was mild or moderate for most patients. Many cold hypersensitive patients managed to continue to work even under cold conditions and cold hypersensitivity was a greater problem in leisure activities.