Improved Understanding of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery Concepts Through Targeted Case-Based Educational Intervention: A Pilot Study.

OBJECTIVES: Given the complex anatomy and pathophysiology of urogynecologic disorders, obstetrics and gynecology residents can have difficulty learning the subject's principles. There are no standardized resources for educators in this subspecialty. We hypothesized that our case-based educational intervention was associated with enhanced knowledge and greater resident satisfaction versus traditional urogynecology lectures. METHODS: This is a prospective study involving 19 obstetrics and gynecology residents at a single institution. Residents participated in three 1-hour case-based lectures, which included prelecture and postlecture topic knowledge assessments. Nonparametric Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to compare the before and after responses. Resident satisfaction was assessed using a 5-point Likert scale questionnaire. RESULTS: The median scores for the pretraining and posttraining assessments of resident urogynecology subject knowledge were 8 (5-10) and 10 (8-10), respectively. A stratified analysis was performed based on postgraduate year (PGY) and median prelectures and postlectures scores showed statistically significance (P < 0.001). Analysis of the PGY subgroups demonstrated statistical significance in PGY1 (P = 0.004), PGY2 (P = 0.008), and PGY3 (P = 0.03). However, the PGY4 subgroup (P = 0.06) did not reach statistical significance.All residents regardless of PGY level either agreed or strongly agreed that the case-based educational intervention enhanced resident knowledge, engagement, and clarity of the relevant teaching points and decreased resident stress about urogynecology topics. CONCLUSIONS: The case-based educational intervention significantly improved resident knowledge in urogynecology and enhanced resident satisfaction with this teaching method versus traditional lectures.

Efficacy of Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment for Management of Postpartum Pain.

CONTEXT: Pain is one of the most common postpartum complaints by women in the United States, and the pain varies in its location. Research on intervention strategies for postpartum pain has focused primarily on the lower back, but pain management for other types of postpartum pain remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) on postpartum pain; the location, quality, and timing of pain; and the difference in pain between vaginal and cesarean delivery. METHODS: Postpartum patients who reported having pain were recruited at St Barnabas Hospital in Bronx, New York. The short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire was administered along with a screening questionnaire. Second- or third-year residents in neuromusculoskeletal medicine and osteopathic manipulative medicine examined patients and then diagnosed and managed somatic dysfunction with OMT for approximately 25 minutes. The short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire was again administered after OMT. Paired t tests and McNemar tests were used to analyze changes before and after OMT for continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Differences in visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores between patients who had vaginal vs cesarean delivery were tested using analysis of variance, and group differences in pain location were tested using a Pearson χ2 test. RESULTS: A total of 59 patients were included in the study. The mean VAS score for pain was 5.0 before OMT and 2.9 after OMT (P<.001). The VAS scores before OMT significantly differed between patients who had a vaginal delivery and those who had a cesarean delivery (P<.001), but the mean decrease in VAS score was similar in both groups. Decreases in low back pain (34 [57.6%] before and 16 [27.1%] after OMT), abdominal pain (32 [54.2%] before and 22 [37.3%] after OMT), and vaginal pain (11 [18.6%] before and 5 [8.5%] after OMT) were reported after OMT (P<.05). CONCLUSION: Preliminary results demonstrate that OMT is efficacious for postpartum pain management. The lack of a control group precludes the ability to make causal claims. Future studies are needed to solidify OMT efficacy and generalizability.