Internal and external adenomyosis phenotypes: ultrasound features and association with clinical outcomes.

STUDY QUESTION: What are the sonographic and clinical findings in women diagnosed with external and internal adenomyosis by ultrasound? SUMMARY ANSWER: Patients with external and internal adenomyosis phenotypes, diagnosed by ultrasound, present differences in sonographic features of the disease and demographic characteristics including age, parity, and association with deep endometriosis (DE) and leiomyomas. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Two different phenotypes of adenomyosis have been described based on the anatomical location of adenomyotic lesions in the myometrium, suggesting that adenomyosis affecting the inner myometrium and that affecting the external myometrial layer may have distinct origins. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A cross-sectional study including 505 patients with a sonographic diagnosis of adenomyosis was performed between January 2021 and December 2022. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Women sonographically diagnosed with adenomyosis in a tertiary referral hospital that serves as a national reference center for endometriosis were included over a 2-year period. Patients were divided into two groups (internal and external adenomyosis) according to the myometrial layer affected by adenomyosis. We compared sonographic and clinical outcomes including a multivariate analysis between the two groups. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: According to ultrasound findings, 353 (69.9%) patients presented with internal adenomyosis, while 152 (30.1%) presented with external adenomyosis. Women with internal adenomyosis were significantly older and less frequently nulliparous compared to those with external adenomyosis. Sonographically, internal adenomyosis appeared diffusely, it had a greater number of adenomyosis features, it presented a globular morphology of the uterus more frequently, and it coexisted with leiomyomas more frequently, compared to external adenomyosis. Conversely, the presence of translesional vascularity and associated DE were more common among the external adenomyosis group. No significant differences were found between internal and external adenomyosis groups regarding pain, heavy menstrual bleeding, spotting, or infertility. In the multivariate analysis, nulliparity, the presence of leiomyomas, and the presence of DE were independently associated with adenomyosis phenotypes (the presence of DE and nulliparity increased the risk of external adenomyosis, whereas the presence of leiomyomas was a risk factor for internal adenomyosis). Considering the impact of hormonal treatment, we found that the number of ultrasound adenomyosis criteria was significantly greater in patients without hormonal treatment. Non-treated patients more commonly presented dysmenorrhea or bleeding-associated pain and heavy menstrual bleeding than women on hormonal treatment, although there were no significant differences according to adenomyosis phenotypes. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: As the population was selected from the Endometriosis Unit of a tertiary center, there may be patient selection bias, given the high prevalence of individuals with associated endometriosis, previous endometriosis-related surgery, and/or receiving hormonal treatment. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Transvaginal ultrasound is the most available and cost-effective tool for the diagnosis of adenomyosis. Adenomyosis phenotypes based on ultrasound findings may be key in achieving an accurate diagnosis and in decision-making regarding the most adequate therapeutic strategy for the management of patients with adenomyosis. Determination of the sonographic features associated with symptoms could help in the evaluation of treatment response. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): No funding was obtained for this study and there are no conflicts of interest to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

Transvaginal ultrasound for diagnosis of deep endometriosis involving uterosacral ligaments, torus uterinus and posterior vaginal fornix: prospective study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of transvaginal ultrasound (TVS) in diagnosing deep endometriosis (DE) involving the uterosacral ligaments (USLs), torus uterinus (TU) or posterior vaginal fornix (PVF) in women with suspected endometriosis scheduled for laparoscopic surgery. METHODS: In this prospective study, consecutive women with clinically suspected pelvic endometriosis who were scheduled for laparoscopic surgery were invited to participate. TVS was performed before surgery. TVS findings were compared with those obtained at laparoscopy and confirmed histologically. The accuracy of TVS for diagnosing DE involving the USLs, TU or PVF was assessed. Additionally, the association of DE involving the USLs, TU or PVF on TVS with symptoms and with DE affecting other pelvic locations was assessed. RESULTS: In total, 172 patients were included. The global sensitivity and specificity of TVS in diagnosing DE affecting the USLs, TU and/or PVF were 92% and 87%, respectively. For DE involving the USLs, the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), positive likelihood ratio and negative likelihood ratio of TVS were 89.5%, 96.6%, 82.1%, 85.0%, 95.8%, 5.41 and 0.04, respectively; the respective values for DE involving the TU were 86.6%, 83.9%, 89.4%, 89.0%, 84.4%, 7.92 and 0.18, and the respective values for DE involving the PVF were 93.6%, 87.0%, 94.6%, 71.4%, 97.9%, 16.20 and 0.14. Logistic regression analysis showed a significant association between DE affecting the USLs, TU and/or PVF and DE affecting the rectosigmoid (odds ratio, 5.43; P < 0.001). Dyschezia was associated strongly with DE involving the USLs, TU and PVF, while dysmenorrhea was associated significantly with DE involving the TU. CONCLUSION: TVS has high accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV for the detection of DE involving the USLs, TU and PVF in women with suspected endometriosis scheduled for laparoscopic surgery. © 2021 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Guía de actuación para el manejo de la infección por COVID-19 durante en el embarazo / A clinical management protocol for COVID-19 infection in pregnant women

La infección causada por el nuevo coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) representa actualmente una de las mayores emergencias sanitarias a nivel mundial. La aparición de una nueva infección potencialmente grave y la situación de pandemia actual ha implicado importantes ajustes en la práctica clínica en medicina materno-fetal. Aunque no parece existir una mayor afectación o susceptibilidad al virus de las mujeres embarazadas respecto la población general, existen aspectos específicos ligados a la gestación que deben tenerse en cuenta de cara al diagnóstico y manejo de la COVID-19 en pacientes embarazadas. En el siguiente documento se exponen las recomendaciones y el protocolo de actuación ante la infección por COVID-19 durante el embarazo desarrollado en nuestro centro, basado en la evidencia científica disponible hasta la fecha y las principales recomendaciones internacionales

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus2 (SARS-CoV-2) disease (COVID-19) has caused a large global outbreak and has had a major impact on health systems and societies worldwide. The generation of knowledge about the disease has occurred almost as fast as its global expansion. Very few studies have reported on the effects of the infection on maternal health, since its onset. The mother and foetus do not seem to be at particularly high risk. Nevertheless, obstetrics and maternal-foetal medicine practice have made profound changes in order to adapt to the pandemic. In addition, there are aspects specific to COVID-19 and gestation that should be known by specialists. In this review an evidenced-based protocol is presented for the management of COVID-19 in pregnancy

[A clinical management protocol for COVID-19 infection in pregnant women]. / Guía de actuación para el manejo de la infección por COVID-19 durante en el embarazo.

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) disease (COVID-19) has caused a large global outbreak and has had a major impact on health systems and societies worldwide. The generation of knowledge about the disease has occurred almost as fast as its global expansion. Very few studies have reported on the effects of the infection on maternal health, since its onset. The mother and foetus do not seem to be at particularly high risk. Nevertheless, obstetrics and maternal-foetal medicine practice have made profound changes in order to adapt to the pandemic. In addition, there are aspects specific to COVID-19 and gestation that should be known by specialists. In this review an evidenced-based protocol is presented for the management of COVID-19 in pregnancy.