Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
PLoS Genet ; 3(2): e28, 2007 Feb 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17319746

RESUMO

The cohesin complexes play a key role in chromosome segregation during both mitosis and meiosis. They establish sister chromatid cohesion between duplicating DNA molecules during S-phase, but they also have an important role during postreplicative double-strand break repair in mitosis, as well as during recombination between homologous chromosomes in meiosis. An additional function in meiosis is related to the sister kinetochore cohesion, so they can be pulled by microtubules to the same pole at anaphase I. Data about the dynamics of cohesin subunits during meiosis are scarce; therefore, it is of great interest to characterize how the formation of the cohesin complexes is achieved in order to understand the roles of the different subunits within them. We have investigated the spatio-temporal distribution of three different cohesin subunits in prophase I grasshopper spermatocytes. We found that structural maintenance of chromosome protein 3 (SMC3) appears as early as preleptotene, and its localization resembles the location of the unsynapsed axial elements, whereas radiation-sensitive mutant 21 (RAD21) (sister chromatid cohesion protein 1, SCC1) and stromal antigen protein 1 (SA1) (sister chromatid cohesion protein 3, SCC3) are not visualized until zygotene, since they are located in the synapsed regions of the bivalents. During pachytene, the distribution of the three cohesin subunits is very similar and all appear along the trajectories of the lateral elements of the autosomal synaptonemal complexes. However, whereas SMC3 also appears over the single and unsynapsed X chromosome, RAD21 and SA1 do not. We conclude that the loading of SMC3 and the non-SMC subunits, RAD21 and SA1, occurs in different steps throughout prophase I grasshopper meiosis. These results strongly suggest the participation of SMC3 in the initial cohesin axis formation as early as preleptotene, thus contributing to sister chromatid cohesion, with a later association of both RAD21 and SA1 subunits at zygotene to reinforce and stabilize the bivalent structure. Therefore, we speculate that more than one cohesin complex participates in the sister chromatid cohesion at prophase I.


Assuntos
Proteínas de Ciclo Celular/metabolismo , Cromatina/metabolismo , Proteínas Cromossômicas não Histona/metabolismo , Gafanhotos/genética , Prófase Meiótica I , Proteínas Nucleares/metabolismo , Sistema A de Transporte de Aminoácidos/metabolismo , Animais , Células Cultivadas , Pareamento Cromossômico , Cromossomos/metabolismo , Drosophila , Gafanhotos/metabolismo , Masculino , Modelos Biológicos , Subunidades Proteicas/metabolismo , Espermatogônias/citologia , Espermatogônias/metabolismo , Testículo/metabolismo , Distribuição Tecidual , Coesinas
2.
Curr Biol ; 13(3): 208-18, 2003 Feb 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12573216

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The coordination of cell cycle events is necessary to ensure the proper duplication and dissemination of the genome. In this study, we examine the consequences of depleting Drad21 and SA, two non-SMC subunits of the cohesin complex, by dsRNA-mediated interference in Drosophila cultured cells. RESULTS: We have shown that a bona fide cohesin complex exists in Drosophila embryos. Strikingly, the Drad21/Scc1 and SA/Scc3 non-SMC subunits associate more intimately with one another than they do with the SMCs. We have observed defects in mitotic progression in cells from which Drad21 has been depleted: cells delay in prometaphase with normally condensed, but prematurely separated, sister chromatids and with abnormal spindle morphology. Much milder defects are observed when SA is depleted from cells. The dynamics of the chromosome passenger protein, INCENP, are affected after Drad21 depletion. We have also made the surprising observation that SA is unstable in the absence of Drad21; however, we have shown that the converse is not true. Interference with Drad21 in living Drosophila embryos also has deleterious effects on mitotic progression. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that Drad21, as a member of a cohesin complex, is required in Drosophila cultured cells and embryos for proper mitotic progression. The protein is required in cultured cells for chromosome cohesion, spindle morphology, dynamics of a chromosome passenger protein, and stability of the cohesin complex, but apparently not for normal chromosome condensation. The observation of SA instability in the absence of Drad21 implies that the expression of cohesin subunits and assembly of the cohesin complex will be tightly regulated.


Assuntos
Proteínas de Ciclo Celular/metabolismo , Proteínas de Drosophila/metabolismo , Drosophila melanogaster/fisiologia , Mitose/fisiologia , Proteínas Nucleares/metabolismo , Subunidades Proteicas/metabolismo , Animais , Proteínas de Ciclo Celular/genética , Tamanho Celular , Células Cultivadas , Proteínas Cromossômicas não Histona/metabolismo , Cromossomos/metabolismo , Ciclina B/metabolismo , Proteínas de Drosophila/genética , Drosophila melanogaster/anatomia & histologia , Drosophila melanogaster/embriologia , Proteínas Fúngicas , Substâncias Macromoleculares , Proteínas Nucleares/genética , Subunidades Proteicas/genética , Interferência de RNA , RNA de Cadeia Dupla/genética , RNA de Cadeia Dupla/metabolismo , Fuso Acromático/metabolismo , Coesinas
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...