Utilization of the En Route Aeromedical Patient Movement Form by Critical Care Air Transport Teams.

INTRODUCTION: Understanding usage patterns of current paper-based documentation can inform the development of electronic documentation forms for en route care. The primary objective was to analyze the frequency of use of each field within the 3899 L Patient Movement Record documented by en route Critical Care Air Transport Teams. Secondary objectives were to identify rarely utilized form fields and to analyze the proportion of verifiable major events documented within the 3899 L form. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 3899 L patient movement records for patients transported via Critical Care Air Transport Teams from January 2019 to December 2019. Scanned 3899 L forms were manually transcribed into a Microsoft Access database for evaluation and analysis. Proportions were calculated for completed fields. Major vital sign event frequency was compared for checkbox fields versus the vital sign flow sheet for each patient. We performed descriptive analyses for the proportion of charts with completed documentation in each evaluated field and the proportion of flow sheet events documented in major event fields. RESULTS: We analyzed 130 records. Fourteen of 18 (77.8%) demographic fields had a 75% or greater completion ratio. Sections with the largest proportion of rarely or never utilized fields (<1.5% completed) were procedures (77.8% of fields) and major events (63.9% of fields). Major event checkboxes had low sensitivity for documented events in the flow sheet: Change in heart rate greater than 20% (1 of 28 patients); increase in the fraction of inspired oxygen requirement of greater than 10% (6 of 23 patients); decrease in mean arterial pressure of greater than 20% (1 in 12 patients); and temperature less than 35.6°C (1 in 13 patients). CONCLUSIONS: Many of the current 3899 L fields are highly utilized, but some 3899 L sections contain high proportions of rarely utilized fields. Major event checkboxes did not consistently capture events documented within the in-flight vital sign flow sheet.

A Deeper Dive Into Combat Medic Training.

The recent article by Knisely et al. provides a comprehensive review and summary of recent literature describing simulation techniques, training strategies, and technologies to teach medics combat casualty care skills. Some of the results reported by Knisely et al. align with the findings of our team's work, and these findings may be helpful to military leadership with their ongoing efforts to maintain medical readiness. Accordingly, we provide some additional contextual understanding to the results of Knisely et al. in this commentary. Our team recently published two papers describing the results of a large survey that examined Army medic pre-deployment training. Combining the findings of Knisely et al. along with some of the contextual information from our work, we provide some recommendations for improving and optimizing the pre-deployment training paradigm for medics.

Characteristics of burn casualties treated at role 2 in Afghanistan.

BACKGROUND: Role 2 medical treatment facilities (MTFs) are frequently located in austere settings and have limited resources. A dedicated assessment of burn casualties treated at this level of care has not been performed. Therefore, the objective of this study was to characterize burn casualties presenting to role 2 MTFs in Afghanistan, along with the procedures they required, complications, and mortality to begin understanding the resources consumed by their care. METHODS: We identified burn casualties from the Department of Defense Trauma Registry (DODTR). The inclusion criteria were (1) experienced burn injuries in Afghanistan between October 2005 and April 2018 and (2) had documentation of treatment at role 2 in the DODTR. We excluded casualties with only first-degree burns, not otherwise specified burns, or only corneal burns. Casualty demographics, injury characteristics, procedures, and outcomes were reported. RESULTS: We identified 453 burn casualties with a median (interquartile range) Injury Severity Score of 10 (4-22) and percent total body surface area burned of 11 (5-30). There were 123 casualties (27.2%) with inhalation injury, and the casualties experienced 3,343 additional traumatic injuries and needed 2,530 procedures. Casualties with documentation of resuscitation information received a median (interquartile range) of 1.9 (0.7-3.7) L of crystalloid fluids. Complications were documented in 53 casualties (11.7%). Final mortality was reported in 36 casualties (8.0%), and mortality at role 2 MTFs was reported in 7 casualties (1.5%). CONCLUSION: Burn casualties had many injuries and needed many procedures, including those related to airway management, resuscitation, and wound care. Given the urgency of these procedures, ensuring that there is enough equipment and supplies will be important in the future. Although infrequent, some casualties experienced complications. Factors that may influence resuscitation include injury severity, concomitant traumatic injuries, and available supplies. Obtaining more contextual information on the patient care environment will be useful going forward. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Epidemiological, level III.

Predeployment training of Army medics assigned to prehospital settings.

BACKGROUND: Medics have numerous responsibilities in the combat theater, which include performing lifesaving interventions, providing basic medical and nursing care, and caring for casualties in a variety of scenarios unique to the battlefield. An evaluation of the medic predeployment training paradigm is important and will help to understand its current state and identify areas for improvement. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to perform a focused assessment of Army medic predeployment training to identify patterns that might inform future medic training. METHODS: A web-based survey was created using the Intelink.gov platform and sent by e-mail to Army medics who deployed since 2001. Medics were asked to reflect upon the predeployment training from their most recent deployment experience. There were multiple choice, Likert-type scale, and free-text response questions. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the results. RESULTS: There were 254 respondents who met the study inclusion criteria. Most of the respondents had their clinical competency evaluated (68.5%, n = 174). Respondents reported several acute trauma, basic nursing, and battlefield medicine skills as being critical but also felt that many of these same skills would have benefited from additional predeployment training. Most of the respondents felt very or fully confident and prepared to provide combat casualty care (74.8%, n = 190 and 74.8%, n = 190). There were 64 respondents (25.2%) who reported feeling not at all, slightly, or moderately confident, and 54 (84.4%) of these respondents described in a free-text question wanting additional training before deployment. CONCLUSION: Respondents reported many skills as being critical to combat casualty care, but several of these skills would have benefited from additional predeployment training. Respondents with more deployment experience or completion of more predeployment training reported feeling more confident and prepared to provide combat casualty care. A common sentiment was the desire for more training of any form before deployment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Epidemiological, level IV.

Simulation versus live tissue training randomised trial for ECMO proficiency: is one better than the other?

Introduction: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a classic low-volume high-risk procedure that requires just in time and/or refresher training through animal or simulation modalities. This manuscript evaluated the performance of ECMO personnel trained with both modalities to determine which is better suited for ECMO skills training. Methods: Participants (physicians, nurses and respiratory/medical technicians) completed a series of ECMO scenarios with synthetic tissue cannulation task trainer as well as a live tissue model. Objective performance quality was based on task completion using a validated ECMO skills assessment tool. Results: Thirty-eight individuals completed this study. Participants completed individual scenario tasks 3 min faster using the simulator (26 min vs 29 min; p=0.03). No differences were seen in percentage of individual tasks completed. In the group scenarios, participants completed a higher percentage of critical tasks using the simulator (97%) versus the animal model (91%; p=0.05), but no differences were seen in task completion times. Additionally, no differences were seen in either lab-based or participants' prelab cognitive scores. Conclusions: Regardless of their self-assessment or experience, participants' objective performances were similar among both animal and simulation labs. Task completion times were quicker with simulation model. The distinction between simulation versus animal model may be less important as both demonstrate benefit in development of and/or maintaining skill competency. In the era of questioning the need for and costs of live tissue training, expanding the role of simulation may achieve similar training goals.

An Assessment of Pre-deployment Training for Army Nurses and Medics.

INTRODUCTION: Although military nurses and medics have important roles in caring for combat casualties, no standardized pre-deployment training curriculum exists for those in the Army. A large-scale, survey-based evaluation of pre-deployment training would help to understand its current state and identify areas for improvement. The purpose of this study was to survey Army nurses and medics to describe their pre-deployment training. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using the Intelink.gov platform, a web-based survey was sent by e-mail to Army nurses and medics from the active and reserve components who deployed since 2001. The survey consisted of questions asking about pre-deployment training from their most recent deployment experience. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the results, and free text comments were also captured. RESULTS: There were 682 respondents: 246 (36.1%) nurses and 436 (63.9%) medics. Most of the nurses (n = 132, 53.7%) and medics (n = 298, 68.3%) reported that they were evaluated for clinical competency before deployment. Common courses and topics included Tactical Combat Casualty Care, Advanced Cardiac Life Support, cultural awareness, and trauma care. When asked about the quality of their pre-deployment training, most nurses (n = 186; 75.6%) and medics (n = 359; 82.3%) indicated that their training was adequate or better. Nearly all nurses and medics reported being moderately confident or better (nurses n = 225; 91.5% and medics n = 399; 91.5%) and moderately prepared or better (nurses n = 223; 90.7% and medics n = 404; 92.7%) in their ability to provide combat casualty care. When asked if they participated in a team-based evaluation of clinical competence, many nurses (n = 121, 49.2%) and medics (n = 180, 41.3%) reported not attending a team training program. CONCLUSIONS: Most nurse and medic respondents were evaluated for clinical competency before deployment, and they attended a variety of courses that covered many topics. Importantly, most nurses and medics were satisfied with the quality of their training, and they felt confident and prepared to provide care. Although these are encouraging findings, they must be interpreted within the context of self-report, survey-based assessments, and the low response rate. Although these limitations and weaknesses of our study limit the generalizability of our results, this study attempts to address a critical knowledge gap regarding pre-deployment training of military nurses and medics. Our results may be used as a basis for conducting additional studies to gather more information on the state of pre-deployment training for nurses and medics. These studies will hopefully have a higher response rate and better quantify how many individuals received any form of pre-deployment training. Additionally, our recommendations regarding pre-deployment training that we derived from the study results may be helpful to military leadership.

Anatomic injury patterns in combat casualties treated by forward surgical teams.

BACKGROUND: Role 2 forward surgical teams provide damage-control resuscitation and surgery for life- and limb-threatening injuries. These teams have limited resources and personnel, so understanding the anatomic injury patterns seen by these teams is vital for providing adequate training and preparation prior to deployment. The objective of this study was to describe the spectrum of injuries treated at Role 2 facilities in Afghanistan. METHODS: Using Department of Defense Trauma Registry data, a retrospective, secondary data analysis was conducted. Eligible patients were all battle or non-battle-injured casualties treated by Role 2 forward surgical teams in Afghanistan from October 2005 to June 2018. Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) 2005 codes were used to classify each injury and Injury Severity Score (ISS) was calculated for each patient. Patients with multiple trauma were defined as patients with an AIS severity code >2 in at least two ISS body regions. RESULTS: The data set included 10,383 eligible patients with 45,225 diagnosis entries (range, 1-27 diagnoses per patient). The largest number of injuries occurred in the lower extremity/pelvis/buttocks (23.9%). Most injuries were categorized as minor (39.4%) or moderate (38.8%) in AIS severity, while the largest number of injuries categorized as severe or worse occurred in the head (13.5%). Among head injuries, 1,872 injuries were associated with a cerebral concussion or diffuse axonal injury, including 50.6% of those injuries being associated with a loss of consciousness. There were 1,224 patients with multiple trauma, and the majority had an injury to the extremities/pelvic girdle (58.2%). Additionally, 3.7% of all eligible patients and 10.5% of all patients with multiple trauma did not survive to Role 2 discharge. CONCLUSION: The injury patterns seen in recent conflicts and demonstrated by this study may assist military medical leaders and planners to optimize forward surgical care in future environments, on a larger scale, and utilizing less resources. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Epidemiological, Level III.

Forward Surgical Team Procedural Burden and Non-operative Interventions by the U.S. Military Trauma System in Afghanistan, 2008-2014.

INTRODUCTION: No published study has reported non-surgical interventions performed by forward surgical teams, and there are no current surgical benchmarks for forward surgical teams. The objective of the study was to describe operative procedures and non-operative interventions received by battlefield casualties and determine the operative procedural burden on the trauma system. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of data from the Joint Trauma System Forward Surgical Team Database using battle and non-battle injured casualties treated in Afghanistan from 2008-2014. Overall procedure frequency, mortality outcome, and survivor morbidity outcome were calculated using operating room procedure codes grouped by the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project classification. Cumulative attributable burden of procedures was calculated by frequency, mortality, and morbidity. Morbidity and mortality burden were used to rank procedures. RESULTS: The study population was comprised of 10,992 casualties, primarily male (97.8%), with a median age interquartile range of 25.0 (22.0-30.0). Affiliations were non-U.S. military (40.0%), U.S. military (35.1%), and others (25.0%). Injuries were penetrating (65.2%), blunt (32.8), and burns (2.0%). Casualties included 4.4% who died and 14.9% who lived but had notable morbidity findings. After ranking by contribution to trauma system morbidity and mortality burden, the top 10 of 32 procedure groups accounted for 74.4% of operative care, 77.9% of mortality, and 73.1% of unexpected morbidity findings. These procedure groups included laparotomy, vascular procedures, thoracotomy, debridement, lower and upper gastrointestinal procedures, amputation, and therapeutic procedures on muscles and upper and lower extremity bones. Most common non-operative interventions included X-ray, ultrasound, wound care, catheterization, and intubation. CONCLUSIONS: Forward surgical team training and performance improvement metrics should focus on optimizing commonly performed operative procedures and non-operative interventions. Operative procedures that were commonly performed, and those associated with higher rates of morbidity and mortality, can set surgical benchmarks and outline training and skillsets needed by forward surgical teams.

Using the Delphi Technique to Determine Core Components of a Nurse Competency Program.

This modified Delphi study determined consensus on core nurse competency program components that apply across the continuum of transition to initial practice, to new specialty practice, to a new role, or within general nursing orientation. The literature review found no published agreement on support and systems for universal transition programs. This broad-based study addressed this gap by identifying core elements within a competency or transition program and then ranking their importance within program structure.

An Evidence-Based Approach to Precepting New Nurses.

While developing a standardized approach to orient new staff in the U.S. Army Institute of Surgical Research Burn Center at Fort Sam Houston in Texas, nurse leaders identified the need to also standardize preceptor selection and instruction. A multidisciplinary research team conducted a two-year pilot project based on the evidence-based Vermont Nurses in Partnership Clinical Transition Framework, which provides a structured method for preceptor selection, development, and evaluation. Minimum preceptor qualifications; preceptor validation processes; and modifiable, unit-specific coaching tools were established. The authors previously published a description of the preceptor program implementation process and their findings. In this article, they discuss lessons learned during the project, highlighting the challenges and obstacles encountered when implementing this preceptorship program.

En Route Critical Care Transfer From a Role 2 to a Role 3 Medical Treatment Facility in Afghanistan.

BACKGROUND: En route care is the transfer of patients requiring combat casualty care within the US military evacuation system. No reports have been published about en route care of patients during transfer from a forward surgical facility (role 2) to a combat support hospital (role 3) for comprehensive care. OBJECTIVE: To describe patients transferred from a role 2 to a role 3 US military treatment facility in Afghanistan. METHODS: A retrospective review of data from the Joint Trauma System Role 2 Database was conducted. Patient characteristics were described by en route care medical attendants. RESULTS: More than one-fourth of patients were intubated at transfer (26.9%), although at transfer fewer than 10% of patients had a base deficit of more than 5 (3.5%), a pH of less than 7.3 (5.2%), an international normalized ratio of more than 2 (0.8%), or temporary abdominal or chest closure (7.4%). The en route care medical attendant was most often a nurse (35.5%), followed by technicians (14.1%) and physicians (10.0%). Most patients (75.3%) were transported by medical evacuation (on rotary-wing aircraft). CONCLUSION: This is the first comprehensive review of patients transported from a forward surgical facility to a more robust combat support hospital in Afghanistan. Understanding the epidemiology of these patients will inform provider training and the appropriate skill mix for the transfer of postsurgical patients within a combat setting.

A Review of Casualties Transported to Role 2 Medical Treatment Facilities in Afghanistan.

Critically injured trauma patients benefit from timely transport and care. Accordingly, the provision of rapid transport and effective treatment capabilities in appropriately close proximity to the point of injury will optimize time and survival. Pre-transport tactical combat casualty care, rapid transport with en route casualty care, and advanced damage control resuscitation and surgery delivered early by small, mobile, forward-positioned Role 2 medical treatment facilities have potential to reduce morbidity and mortality from trauma. This retrospective review and descriptive analysis of trauma patients transported from Role 1 entities to Role 2 facilities in Afghanistan from 2008 to 2014 found casualties to be diverse in affiliation and delivered by various types and modes of transport. Air medical evacuation provided transport for most patients, while the shortest transport time was seen with air casualty evacuation. Although relatively little data were collected for air casualty evacuation, this rapid mode of transport remains an operationally important method of transport on the battlefield. For prehospital care provided before and during transport, continued leadership and training emphasis should be placed on the administration and documentation of tactical combat casualty care as delivered by both medical and non-medical first responders.

Clinical Transition Framework: Integrating Coaching Plans, Sampling, and Accountability in Clinical Practice Development.

The clinical transition framework (CTF) is a competency-based practice development system used by nursing professional development practitioners to support nurses' initial orientation or transition to a new specialty. The CTF is applicable for both new graduate and proficient nurses. The current framework and tools evolved from 18 years of performance improvement and research projects engaged in both acute and community care environments in urban and rural settings. This article shares core CTF concepts, a description of coaching plans, and a professional accountability statement as experienced within the framework.

Factors associated with trauma patients' length of stay at Role 2 facilities in Afghanistan, October 2009 to September 2014.

BACKGROUND: Understanding patients' length of stay at far-forward Role 2 surgical units may help to determine support needs, stabilization requirements, predeployment training, and necessity of increased care capability before or during transport to a higher level of care. The objectives of this study were to (1) evaluate the amount of time patients spent at Role 2 and (2) determine the factors associated with trauma patients' length of stay at Role 2. METHODS: We conducted a secondary data analysis of the Joint Trauma System Role 2 Database. Logistic regression was used to determine factors associated with extended length of stay at Role 2. RESULTS: There were 7,912 study patients, and the overall median (interquartile range) amount of time patients spent at Role 2 was 2.5 (1.2-5.5) hours. The adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of extended stay for civilian/other forces and non-US military patients were 1.2 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.0-1.4) and 1.4 (95% CI, 1.2-1.7) times higher as compared with US military patients, respectively. The aOR of extended stay were higher for patients who received blood transfusions (aOR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.2-1.6), surgical procedures (aOR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.4-1.8), or did not use a tourniquet (aOR, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.0-1.5). As compared with those injured by an explosion, the adjusted odds of extended stay were 1.2 (95% CI, 1.0-1.4) times higher for patients injured by another mechanism. The odds of extended stay were lower (aOR, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.2-0.5) for patients who died and higher (aOR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.2-1.6) for transferred patients as compared with patients who returned to duty. CONCLUSION: In this study, interventions, patient affiliation, discharge status, and injury mechanism were associated with length of stay at Role 2. Our study results will help inform training and current Role 2 logistic and personnel support needs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic, level III.

Impact of a Nurse Residency Program on Transition to Specialty Practice.

A nurse residency program can support transition for new-to-specialty nurses but requires commitment of time and resources. This implementation project used a specialty residency program shown to be effective in a Burn Center, and translated it into the Emergency Department and Maternal Child Health area located within the same medical treatment facility. Preceptor survey responses and leadership assessment of program suitability provided data related to intervention impact. The evidence pertaining to developing specialty knowledge, skills, competency, and clinical reasoning validated program efficacy. Project outcomes justify investment in building a standardized transitional support system.

Implementation and outcomes of an evidence-based precepting program for burn nurses.

INTRODUCTION: There is significant nationwide interest in transitioning new and new-to-specialty nurses into practice, especially in burn care. Lack of a structured transition program in our Burn Center was recognized as a contributing factor for nursing dissatisfaction and increased turnover compared to other hospital units. Employee evaluations exposed a need for more didactic instruction, hands-on learning, and preceptor support. The goal of this project was to implement an evidence-based transition to practice program specific to the burn specialty. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The Iowa Model of Evidence-based Practice served as the model for this project. A working group was formed consisting of nurse scientists, clinical nurse leaders, clinical nurse specialists, lead preceptors, staff nurse preceptors and wound care coordinators. A systematic review of the literature was conducted focusing on nurse transition; preceptor development and transitioning nurse training programs with competency assessment, ongoing multifaceted evaluation and retention strategies were created. The evidence-based Vermont Nurses in Partnership (VNIP) Clinical Transition Framework was selected and subsequent education was provided to all Burn Center leaders and staff. Benchmarks for basic knowledge assessment (BKAT) and burn wound care were established among current staff by work site and education level to help evaluate transitioning nurses. Policies were modified to count each preceptor/transitioning nurse dyad as half an employee on the schedule. Multiple high-fidelity simulation scenarios were created to expand hands-on opportunities. RESULTS: From September 2012-December 2013, 110 (57% acute care nursing) Burn Center staff attended the VNIP Clinical Coaching Course, to include 34 interdisciplinary staff (rehabilitation, education, respiratory therapy, and outpatient clinic staff) and 100% of identified preceptors (n=33). A total of 30 new nurses participated in the transition program: 26 (87%) completed, 3 (10%) did not complete, and 1 (3%) received exception (no patient care). Transitioning nurses achieved passing BKAT scores (n=22; 76%) and WC scores (n=24; 93%); individual remediation was provided for those failing to achieve unit benchmarks and transition training was modified to improve areas of weakness. Transitioning nurses' weekly competency progression average initial ratings on a 10 point scale (10 most competent) were 5±2; final ratings averaged 9±1 (n=25) (p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: An evidence-based team practice approach toward preceptorship created a standardized, comprehensive and flexible precepting program to assist and support transition to specialty burn practice for experienced nurses. Use of objective metrics enabled ongoing assessment and made training adaptable, individualized, and cost effective. Application of this standardized approach across our organization may improve consistency for all transitions in practice specialty.

Is limited prehospital resuscitation with plasma more beneficial than using a synthetic colloid? An experimental study in rabbits with parenchymal bleeding.

BACKGROUND: Reports of survival benefits of early transfusion of plasma with red blood cells (1:1 ratio) in trauma patients suggest that plasma may be a better fluid to replace Hextend for battlefield resuscitation. We studied possible advantages of prehospital resuscitation with plasma compared with Hextend or albumin in a model of uncontrolled hemorrhage. METHODS: Male New Zealand white rabbits (3.3 ± 0.1 kg) were anesthetized, instrumented, and subjected to a splenic injury with uncontrolled bleeding. Ten minutes after injury (mean arterial pressure [MAP] < 40 mm Hg), the rabbits received small and equal volumes (15 mL/kg) of rabbit plasma (n = 10), Hextend (n = 10), or 5% human albumin (n = 9) or no fluid. Fluids were administered in two bolus injections (20 minutes apart) and targeted to a MAP of 65 mm Hg. Animals were monitored for 2.5 hours or until death, and their blood losses were measured. Arterial blood samples were collected at different times and analyzed for ABG, CBC, and coagulation tests. RESULTS: There were no differences in baseline measures among groups. Splenic injury caused similar hemorrhages (9.1 ± 0.4 mL/kg at 10 minutes) and decreased MAP in all subjects. Subsequent resuscitation initiated additional bleeding. At 60 minutes after injury (20 minutes after resuscitation), longer activated partial thromboplastin time and lower fibrinogen concentrations were apparent compared with baseline values with differences among groups. Thrombelastography analysis indicated faster and stronger clot formation with plasma and albumin resuscitation than with Hextend use. Shock indices were increased in all groups, but smaller changes were measured in the albumin group. Total blood loss did not differ among resuscitated rabbits but was higher (p < 0.05) than among nonresuscitated animals. Survival rates were 11% (untreated), 40% (Hextend and plasma), and 89% (albumin, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Resuscitation with plasma or albumin better preserved coagulation function than did Hextend. However, despite these improvements, plasma resuscitation did not reduce blood loss or improve survival, while albumin administration seemed beneficial.

Primary hemostatic capacity of whole blood: a comprehensive analysis of pathogen reduction and refrigeration effects over time.

BACKGROUND: Whole blood (WB) has been used in combat since World War I as it is readily available and replaces every element of shed blood. Component therapy has become standard; however, recent military successes with WB resuscitation have revived the debate regarding wider WB use. Characterization of optimal WB storage is needed. We hypothesized that refrigeration preserves WB function and that a pathogen reduction technology (PRT) based on riboflavin and ultraviolet light has no deleterious effect over 21 days of storage. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: WB units were stored for 21 days either at 4°C or 22°C. Half of each temperature group underwent PRT, yielding four final treatment groups (n = 8 each): CON 4 (WB at 4°C); CON 22 (WB at 22°C); PRT 4 (PRT WB at 4°C); and PRT 22 (PRT WB at 22°C). Testing was at baseline, Days 1-7, 10, 14, and 21. Assays included coagulation factors; platelet activation, aggregation, and adhesion; and thromboelastography (TEG). RESULTS: Prothrombin time (PT) and partial thromboplastin time increased over time; refrigeration attenuated the effects on PT (p ≤ 0.009). Aggregation decreased over time (p ≤ 0.001); losses were attenuated by refrigeration (p ≤ 0.001). Refrigeration preserved TEG parameters (p ≤ 0.001) and PRT 4 samples remained within normal limits throughout the study. Refrigeration in combination with PRT inhibited fibrinolysis (p ≤ 0.001) and microparticle formation (p ≤ 0.031). Cold storage increased shear-induced platelet aggregation and ristocetin-induced platelet agglutination (p ≥ 0.032), as well as GPIb-expressing platelets (p ≤ 0.009). CONCLUSION: The in vitro hemostatic function of WB is largely unaffected by PRT treatment and better preserved by cold storage over 21 days. Refrigerated PRT WB may be suitable for trauma resuscitation. Clinical studies are warranted.