Establishment of an isogenic human colon tumor model for NQO1 gene expression: application to investigate the role of DT-diaphorase in bioreductive drug activation in vitro and in vivo.

Many tumors overexpress the NQO1 gene, which encodes DT-diaphorase (NADPH:quinone oxidoreductase; EC 1.6.99.2). This obligate two-electron reductase deactivates toxins and activates bioreductive anticancer drugs. We describe the establishment of an isogenic human tumor cell model for DT-diaphorase expression. An expression vector was used in which the human elongation factor 1alpha promoter produces a bicistronic message containing the genes for human NQO1 and puromycin resistance. This was transfected into the human colon BE tumor line, which has a disabling point mutation in NQO1. Two clones, BE2 and BE5, were selected that were shown by immunoblotting and enzyme activity to stably express high levels of DT-diaphorase. Drug response was determined using 96-h exposures compared with the BE vector control. Functional validation of the isogenic model was provided by the much greater sensitivity of the NQO1-transfected cells to the known DT-diaphorase substrates and bioreductive agents streptonigrin (113- to 132-fold) and indoloquinone EO9 (17- to 25-fold) and the inhibition of this potentiation by the DT-diaphorase inhibitor dicoumarol. A lower degree of potentiation was seen with the clinically used agent mitomycin C (6- to 7-fold) and the EO9 analogs, EO7 and EO2, that are poorer substrates for DT-diaphorase (5- to 8-fold and 2- to 3-fold potentiation, respectively), and there was no potentiation or protection with menadione and tirapazamine. Exposure time-dependent potentiation was seen with the diaziquone analogs methyl-diaziquone and RH1 [2, 5-diaziridinyl-3-(hydroxymethyl)-6-methyl-1,4-benzoquinone], the latter being an agent in preclinical development. In contrast to the in vitro potentiation, there was no difference in the response to mitomycin C when BE2 and BE vector control were treated as tumor xenografts in vivo. This isogenic model should be valuable for mechanistic studies and bioreductive drug development.

Novel trans platinum complexes: comparative in vitro and in vivo activity against platinum-sensitive and resistant murine tumours.

Two pairs of cis/trans platinum complexes, JM118 (cis-ammine(cyclohexylamine) dichloro platinum(II)) and its trans counterpart, JM334 and JM149 (cis-ammine(cyclohexylamine) dichloro-dihydroxo platinum(IV)) and its trans counterpart JM335 have been evaluated (both in vitro and in vivo) against two murine tumour models of historical importance in the discovery of novel platinum drugs; the ADJ/PC6 plasmacytoma and the L1210 leukaemia and sublines selected for resistance to platinum drugs. In vitro, results showed that the trans complexes induced comparable growth inhibitory properties to those observed for cisplatin and their respective cis isomers. Moreover, retention of activity was observed in a series of 5 acquired platinum drug (cisplatin, carboplatin, iproplatin, tetraplatin and JM149)-resistant L1210 sublines whereas at least partial cross-resistance was observed to the cis isomer JM149 in the acquired carboplatin and iproplatin-resistant lines (in addition to being 11-fold resistant in the line selected for resistance to JM149 itself). In vivo, JM355 showed activity against both the ADJ/PC6 and L1210 models of acquired cisplatin resistance. Furthermore, JM355 was active against an ADJ/PC6 subline possessing resistance to iproplatin and a L1210 subline possessing resistance to its cis isomer JM149. Interestingly, the trans platinum(II) counterpart of JM335(JM334) was inactive in vivo. These data indicate that the trans platinum(IV) complex JM335 possess several in vitro growth inhibitory- and in vivo antitumour properties which are distinct from those observed for cisplatin (or its cis isomer). Thus, JM335 contravenes the original structure-activity rules determined for platinum-containing compounds and, because of its level of activity against cisplatin-resistant tumours, establishes the complex as of interest in the search for new platinum drugs active against cisplatin-resistant disease.

Schedule dependency of orally administered bis-acetato-ammine-dichloro-cyclohexylamine-platinum(IV) (JM216) in vivo.

JM216 is a novel antitumor platinum(IV) complex displaying oral activity, dose-limiting myelosuppression, and a lack of nephro- and neurotoxicity in rodents. It has been selected for clinical evaluation. The schedule dependency of its antitumor action against a murine (ADJ/PC6 plasmacytoma) and a human tumor model (PXN109T/C ovarian carcinoma xenograft) was studied in vivo. Single dose (q21d), once a day dosing for 5 consecutive days (q21d or q28d), and once a day dosing indefinitely (chronic daily dosing) administration schedules were compared. Against the murine ADJ/PC6 plasmacytoma, daily x5 administration improved the tolerance, antitumor potency, and therapeutic index of oral JM216, compared to single dose administration, whereas no advantage was found for fractionating cisplatin dosages. Against the PXN109T/C human ovarian carcinoma xenograft, oral JM216, given at dose levels delivering a equivalent total dose on single dose (200 mg/kg q21d), daily x5 (40 mg/kg/day q21d) and chronic daily dosing (9.5 mg/kg/d) schedules, showed superior tumor growth delays (55 +/- 15 days; P < 0.05) and maximal tumor regression (10 +/- 11% of initial tumor volume; P < 0.001) with the daily x5 schedule. Gastrointestinal toxicity (P < 0.05) and mild nephrotoxicity (P < 0.01) complicated the chronic daily dosing schedule, while leukopenia (P < 0.02) and thrombocytopenia (P < 0.01) were dose-limiting for the single dose and daily x5 administration, respectively. Peak plasma ultrafiltrate (PUF) platinum levels were below cytotoxic levels (PUF Cmax, 0.11 +/- 0.066 mg/l) at the maximally tolerable dose for the chronic dosing schedule (9.5 mg/kg). Peak PUF platinum levels did not increase significantly with a 5-fold increase in dosage from 40 mg/kg (PUF Cmax 1.5 +/- 0.11 mg/l) to 200 mg/kg (PUF Cmax, 2.4 +/- 0.44 mg/l; P > 0.05). In conclusion, these data demonstrate antitumor schedule dependency for oral JM216 in vivo, independently in two tumor model systems, and with nonlinear pharmacokinetics after its oral administration to mice. Optimal antitumor activity, tolerance, and pharmacokinetics occurred with daily x5 dosing, and this has prompted the clinical evaluation of this administration schedule.

Selective potentiation of platinum drug cytotoxicity in cisplatin-sensitive and -resistant human ovarian carcinoma cell lines by amphotericin B.

Resistance to the clinically used platinum-based drugs cisplatin and carboplatin represents a major limitation to their clinical effectiveness. Using cisplatin-sensitive and -resistant human ovarian carcinoma cell lines previously characterized in terms of their major underlying mechanisms of resistance, we attempted to potentiate the cytotoxic effects of cisplatin and carboplatin using the clinically used antifungal agent amphotericin B (AmB). Using non-toxic concentrations of AmB (up to 15 micrograms/ml) and continuous exposure to cisplatin, a concentration-dependent selective potentiation (maximum of 3.2-fold) of cisplatin cytotoxicity was observed in two cisplatin-resistant cell lines (41McisR6, acquired resistant, and HX/62, intrinsically resistant). In both these cisplatin-resistant cell lines, previous studies have shown resistance to be due primarily to reduced platinum uptake. Notably, no significant potentiation was observed in the parent 41M cell line, in the intrinsically resistant SKOV-3 cell line (where reduced drug accumulation plays only a partial role in determining resistance) or in a pair of cell lines (CH1 and its acquired-resistant variant CH1cisR6) were reduced drug uptake does not play any role in determining resistance. The potentiating effect of AmB was lower with carboplatin and not significant in all cell lines. Platinum uptake following a 2-h exposure of cells to cisplatin was enhanced 3.5-fold in 41McisR6 cells (producing platinum levels similar to those obtained in the parental line) and 1.7-fold in 41M cells by the concomitant exposure to AmB. These data indicate that the potentiation of cisplatin (and carboplatin) cytotoxicity by AmB is not due to a generalized membrane disruption, as effects were observed only in resistant lines where reduced drug transport was apparent. Moreover, AmB did not increase the cytotoxicity of JM216 [bis-acetatoammine(cyclohexylamine)dichloroplatinum (II)], a recently developed, more lipophilic orally active platinum drug, in the 41M/41McisR6 lines. JM216 has previously been shown to circumvent acquired cisplatin resistance due to decreased drug uptake. In vivo, however, using the HX/62 xenograft. AmB (at its maximum tolerated dose of 20 mg/kg; q7d x 4 schedule) did not enhance the antitumour effect of carboplatin (at its maximum tolerated dose of 80 mg/kg; q7d x 4 schedule.

The role of murine tumour models and their acquired platinum-resistant counterparts in the evaluation of novel platinum antitumour agents: a cautionary note.

Two murine tumour models, the L1210 leukaemia and the ADJ/PC6 plasmacytoma, have featured prominently in the preclinical development of platinum drugs. Mindful of the unequivocal need to discover new platinum-based drugs exhibiting activity in cisplatin/carboplatin refractory and relapsed cancers, and to devise clinically-predictive screening models, we have generated resistance in vivo in the ADJ/PC6 plasmacytoma to cisplatin (19- to 21-fold), to carboplatin (25-fold), iproplatin (greater than 14-fold) and tetraplatin (10-fold). The chemo-sensitivity profiles of these tumours have been compared with L1210 leukaemia lines resistant to either cisplatin (10-fold) or tetraplatin (34-fold). In cross-resistance studies, the L1210 and ADJ/PC6 resistant variants provided conflicting predictions of structures likely to circumvent cisplatin-acquired resistance. In particular, the L1210/cisplatin resistant model exhibited cross-resistance to carboplatin and iproplatin, whereas the diaminocyclohexane (DACH)-containing complex, tetraplatin, was even more active in the cisplatin resistant tumour than in the 'wild-type' tumour. The ADJ/PC6/cisplatin resistant tumour, however, was cross-resistant, not only to carboplatin and iproplatin, but also to tetraplatin. These data provide an important caveat on the adoption of single acquired resistant animal tumour models for platinum drug development.

The 5-HT3 antagonist, BRL 43694, does not compromise the efficacy of cisplatin in tumour-bearing mice.

Binary combinations of cisplatin and the 5-HT3 antagonist, BRL 43694, have been used to treat both conventional mice bearing either L1210 leukaemia or ADJ/PC6 plasmacytoma and nude mice xenografted with a human ovarian carcinoma (HX/110). In no case was there evidence for antagonism by the antiemetic of the antitumour properties of cisplatin.