Acute urinary retention after magnetic resonance image-guided prostate brachytherapy with and without neoadjuvant external beam radiotherapy.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the risk of acute urinary retention (AUR) and sequelae after urethra-sparing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided prostate brachytherapy. METHODS: Between 1997 and 2003, MRI-guided prostate brachytherapy was performed after external beam radiotherapy (n = 60) or as monotherapy (n = 188) following a diagnosis of low-risk prostate adenocarcinoma. The median prostate gland volume was 40 cm3 (range 16 to 184). Of the 248 patients, 88 (35%) had prostate gland volumes greater than 45 cm3. The median follow-up was 40 months. RESULTS: Of the 248 patients, 18 (7%) developed AUR. Of the 248 patients, 2% (3 of 160), 6% (3 of 49), 28% (8 of 29), and 40% (4 of 10) of patients experienced AUR if the prostate gland volume was less than 45, 45 to 60, 60 to 90, or greater than 90 cm(3), respectively (P <0.0001). Retention requiring intermittent self-catheterization resolved in one half of the patients by 2 weeks and had resolved in all patients by 6 weeks. At 1, 3, and 6 months after implantation, 100%, 57%, and 29% of patients who experienced AUR, respectively, used Flomax (P <0.0001). The mean Flomax dose used decreased from 0.9 mg at 1 month to 0.53 mg at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: AUR after urethral-sparing MRI-guided prostate brachytherapy is volume dependent and is self-limited despite very large prostate gland volumes.

Late genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicity after magnetic resonance image-guided prostate brachytherapy with or without neoadjuvant external beam radiation therapy.

BACKGROUND: This study was designed to estimate the rates of late genitourinary (GU) and rectal toxicity after magnetic resonance image (MRI)-guided prostate brachytherapy exclusively or in conjunction with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). METHODS: Between November 1997 and April 2002, 201 patients with category T1C prostate carcinoma (according to the 2002 American Joint Committee on Cancer staging criteria), prostate specific antigen levels < 10 ng/mL, and biopsy Gleason score 3 + 4 disease were treated with MRI-guided brachytherapy exclusively or in conjunction with EBRT. The MRI-guided technique was designed to spare the urethra based on delivery of the prescription dose to the peripheral zone exclusively. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate rates of freedom from late GU and rectal toxicity. Comparisons were made using a log-rank test. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 2.8 years (range, 0.5-5.0 years), the 4-year estimates of rectal bleeding requiring coagulation for patients who underwent implantation therapy, compared with patients who received combined-modality therapy, were 8% versus 30%, respectively (log-rank P value = 0.0001). Although erectile dysfunction was common (range, 82-93%), with the use of sildenafil citrate (Viagra), it was estimated that at least two-thirds of patients had erectile function comparable to or superior to baseline function, independent of whether they received monotherapy or combined-modality therapy (P = 0.46). The 4-year estimate of freedom from radiation cystitis was 100% versus 95% (P = 0.01) for patients who received monotherapy and patients who received combined-modality therapy, respectively. No urethral strictures were observed, and no patients underwent postimplantation transurethral resection of the prostate. CONCLUSIONS: In the current study, rectal bleeding after MRI-guided prostate brachymonotherapy was infrequent, and urethral and bladder toxicity is reported to be rare and may be attributed to the urethral-sparing technique of the MRI-guided approach.

Using the magnitude of PSA bounce after MRI-guided prostate brachytherapy to distinguish recurrence, benign precipitating factors, and idiopathic bounce.

PURPOSE: To identify events that precipitated a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) bounce and characterize the magnitude, duration, and time to PSA bounce after MRI-guided prostate brachytherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 1997 and 2001, 186 patients with low-risk prostate cancer underwent MRI-guided permanent 125I source implantation, with or without external beam radiotherapy. A PSA bounce was defined as a >or=15% elevation in PSA compared with the most recent value, followed by a decline to a level at or less than the prebounce value. At the time of PSA measurement, data were prospectively collected on whether the patient had recent ejaculation, ongoing radiation proctitis, or recent instrumentation. RESULTS: A total of 115 patients (61.8%) had a total of 156 PSA bounces. Of these, 36 patients had PSA bounces associated with ejaculation, proctitis, or instrumentation, and 79 experienced idiopathic PSA bounces (not associated with a precipitating event). The magnitude of the PSA bounce was significantly lower for the idiopathic PSA bounce (0.6 ng/mL) compared with that associated with ejaculation (p = 0.003), proctitis (p <0.0001), or instrumentation (p = 0.007). Patients with biopsy-proven local recurrence had a median PSA elevation of 1.2 ng/mL, significantly higher (p = 0.006) than the magnitude of the idiopathic PSA bounce, but not significantly different from the magnitude of the PSA bounce due to ejaculation, proctitis, or instrumentation. CONCLUSION: In patients treated with MRI-guided prostate brachytherapy, recent ejaculation, instrumentation, or ongoing radiation proctitis can cause a transient increase in PSA, the magnitude of which is significantly higher than that for idiopathic PSA bounce, but is similar to that in patients with recurrent disease.