Stroke management during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic: experience from three regions of the north east of Italy (Veneto, Friuli-Venezia-Giulia, Trentino-Alto-Adige).

BACKGROUND: Efficiency of care chain response and hospital reactivity were and are challenged for stroke acute care management during the pandemic period of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in North-Eastern Italy (Veneto, Friuli-Venezia-Giulia, Trentino-Alto-Adige), counting 7,193,880 inhabitants (ISTAT), with consequences in acute treatment for patients with ischemic stroke. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective data collection of patients admitted to stroke units eventually treated with thrombolysis and thrombectomy, ranging from January to May 2020 from the beginning to the end of the main first pandemic period of COVID-19 in Italy. The primary endpoint was the number of patients arriving to these stroke units, and secondary endpoints were the number of thrombolysis and/or thrombectomy. Chi-square analysis was used on all patients; furthermore, patients were divided into two cohorts (pre-lockdown and lockdown periods) and the Kruskal-Wallis test was used to test differences on admission and reperfusive therapies. RESULTS: In total, 2536 patients were included in 22 centers. There was a significant decrease of admissions in April compared to January. Furthermore, we observed a significant decrease of thrombectomy during the lockdown period, while thrombolysis rate was unaffected in the same interval across all centers. CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirmed a decrease in admission rate of stroke patients in a large area of northern Italy during the lockdown period, especially during the first dramatic phase. Overall, there was no decrease in thrombolysis rate, confirming an effect of emergency care system for stroke patients. Instead, the significant decrease in thrombectomy rate during lockdown addresses some considerations of local and regional stroke networks during COVID-19 pandemic evolution.

Update on headache and brain tumors.

Headache is one of the leading symptoms often associated with brain tumours. Secondary headaches attributed to intracranial neoplasias have been included in subchapter 7.4 of the third edition of the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD-3). According to ICHD-3, the headache may be attributed to a brain tumour if it has developed in close temporal relation with the development of the neoplasia, has significantly worsened in parallel with the worsening of the tumour, and/or has significantly improved following the successful treatment of the neoplasia. Brain tumour headache was traditionally thought to display some specific clinical characteristics, including worsening in the morning and/or when lying down, being aggravated by Valsalva-like manoeuvres and accompanied by nausea and/or vomiting; however, the studies performed after the advent of modern neurodiagnostic techniques have pointed out that the "classic" brain tumour headache is uncommon, particularly at the time of clinical presentation. Therefore, it becomes critical to seek some specific factors associated with the presence of an intracranial mass (the so-called "red flags") that can guide the physician to establish an accurate diagnosis.

Migraine in adolescents: validation of a screening questionnaire.

BACKGROUND: Few studies in adolescents deal with the level of agreement between questionnaire and interview information in relation to headache symptoms. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the validity of a self-administered questionnaire on headache for use in epidemiological studies of Italian high school students. METHODS: The questionnaire incorporated all items required for diagnosing migraine according to the criteria from the 2004 International Classification of Headache Disorders. The migraine diagnoses obtained from questionnaires were validated against the gold standard diagnoses by a headache specialist. RESULTS: Out of 104 students answering the questionnaires, 93 (89.4%) participated in extensive semi-structured interviews by a neurologist. The chance-corrected agreement rate (kappa) was 0.66, which is considered good. The questionnaire-based migraine diagnosis had a sensitivity of 67.3%, specificity of 100%, positive predictive value of 100%, and negative predictive value of 73.3%. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that our self-administered questionnaire may be an acceptable instrument in determining the prevalence of migraine sufferers in the northeast Italy adolescent population, useful in identifying subjects with "definite" migraine.

Sensory gating deficit assessed by P50/Pb middle latency event related potential in Alzheimer's disease.

Sensory gating is defined as the brain's ability to inhibit repetitive and irrelevant incoming sensory stimuli and is supposed to be related to cholinergic transmission. Indeed, Alzheimer's disease (AD) is characterized by a cholinergic deficit that is believed to be involved in cerebral cortex hyperexcitability and short latency afferent inhibition deficit. Therefore, a sensory gating deficit may be supposed present in AD within the frame of cortex hyperexcitability and loss of cortex modulation of sensory inputs. The authors investigated whether a sensory gating deficit may be present in AD and whether this deficit may be related to the presence of neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) and reversed by donepezil treatment. Sensory gating was evaluated using a paired-stimulus auditory P50 event-related potential paradigm. Eighteen drug-naïve probable AD patients (mean age 76.1 years; SD 5.6 years; 13 females and 5 males) and 15 healthy elderly controls (mean age 74.2 years; SD 5.4 years; 10 females and 5 males) were recruited. Sensory gating was evaluated in AD patients before starting therapy and after 1 and 3 months of donepezil treatment. Auditory P50 sensory gating was impaired in AD patients but no correlation was found between gating deficit and NPS. Moreover, AD patients displayed increased P50 amplitude when compared with healthy elderly subjects. Donepezil treatment did not improve P50 sensory gating in AD patients but decreased P50 amplitude. Patients with AD displayed an augmented P50 amplitude, in accordance with previous studies, suggesting increased cortex excitability. Donepezil does not affect P50 sensory gating but reduces P50 amplitude. Donepezil may induce P50 amplitude reduction by means of enhanced dopamine release. Indeed, it has been demonstrated that donepezil induces dopamine release "in vitro." The findings suggest that AD patients have a sensory gating impairment but the link with both NPS and the cholinergic deficit is doubtful.