Clinical and epidemiological characteristics of KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae from bloodstream infections in a tertiary referral center in Italy.

BACKGROUND: Bloodstream infections (BSI) due to Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing K. pneumoniae (KPC-Kp) have become an important problem and they are associated with a high mortality rate. The aim of our study was to evaluate the clinical and epidemiological characteristics of KPC-Kp from BSIs. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, conducted in a tertiary referral center in Italy, 112 patients with KPC-Kp BSIs diagnosed between February 2011 and December 2015 were identified. We evaluated the mortality at 30 days from the first positive blood culture. Survivor and non-survivor subgroups were compared to identify predictors of mortality. RESULTS: The overall crude mortality was 35%. APACHE II score ≥ 15, septic shock at BSI onset, immunosuppressive therapy during the 30 days before the BSI onset, and the lack of a combination therapy with at least 2 active drugs emerged as independent predictors of mortality. Excluding patients with inadequate therapy, the mortality decreased to 25% while an APACHE II score ≥ 15 and the presence of septic shock remained independently associated with a negative outcome. Two different pulsotypes were identified: pulsotype A belonged to ST512 and carried KPC-3 and pulsotype B belonged to ST307 and carried KPC-2. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirmed a high mortality rate of KPC-Kp BSIs. The outcome is heavily influenced by the patient's clinical conditions. A therapeutic approach including a combination with at least two active drugs in vitro can improve the prognosis, unless patients received an appropriate therapy.

Antiretroviral therapy management and rationalisation of available resources.

The treatment of HIV disease has led to a new division of management costs by shifting most of the necessary resources from inpatient treatment to outpatient management. Among the initiatives aimed at rationalising the resources available, we compared efficacy, tolerability and pharmacoeconomic impact of different regimes of antiretroviral therapy (ART). The survey covered the first 50 patients, clinically stable and with good viro-immunological response, who switched in June 2012 from an ART based on the triple combination of tenofovir (TDF), emtricitabine (FTC) and a protease inhibitor boosted with ritonavir (PI/r) or a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI), to a treatment based on abacavir (ABC), lamivudine (3TC) and a PI/r or NNRTI. Of the 50 patients who operated the switch, 39 replaced a PI with nevirapine (NVP), for which the largest group of patients was treated with ABC + 3TC + NVP. On 31 May 2015, all patients completed the observation period of 96 weeks, with a mean observation period of 132 weeks and clinical-laboratory checks every four months. Laboratory analysis revealed an optimal maintenance of viral suppression and absolute and relative number of CD4 + lymphocytes and improving trend of creatinine, proteinuria, serum phosphate and bone alkaline phosphatase. There was a variable effect on lipids, with a drop in triglycerides associated with a modest increase in total cholesterol. Much of the HIV-positive population reporting to our hospitals (>50%) comprises individuals who have for years been in stable viraemic suppression, making a satisfactory immune recovery while in good overall clinical condition. This type of patient was the target of the present survey. At the end of 96 weeks of observation the new regimes were well tolerated and did not lead to viro-immunological or clinical deterioration. Pharmacoeconomic analysis showed better containment of the overall costs. No patient needed to be hospitalised during the observation period.