Ultrasonographic assessment of mediastinal shift angle (MSA) in isolated left congenital diaphragmatic hernia for the prediction of postnatal survival.

Objectives: To quantify mediastinal shift in isolated congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH), by the introduction of a new ultrasonographic (US) marker, defined as mediastinal shift angle (MSA) and to evaluate its ability in predicting postnatal survival at discharge.Methods: Twenty-four consecutive fetuses from singleton pregnancies with isolated left-sided CDH were included in the study group and then subdivided into group A (16 survivors) and group B (8 nonsurvivors). The study group was matched with a control group of 95 fetuses from singleton pregnancies free from structural and/or chromosomal anomalies. On the same US stored images commonly used for lung-to-head ratio (LHR) measurement, a landmark line was drawn from a point on the posterior face of the vertebral body, splitting it into two equal parts, to the mid-posterior surface of the sternum. Another landmark line was then traced from the same point of the vertebral body to touch tangentially the lateral wall of the right atrium. The angle between these two lines was used to quantify mediastinal shift and called "mediastinal shift angle" (MSA).Results: Median MSA was significantly different between group A (34.3° range 29.3-45.9°) and group B (42.7° range 34.1-58.9°) (p < .001) and between study group as a whole and the control group (19° range 13.8-25.9°) (p < .001). Statistical analysis confirmed an inverse correlation between MSA values and survival (p = .004). The best cutoff value for MSA was 43.7°, which demonstrated the highest discriminatory power (sensitivity 63%; specificity 93.75%).Conclusions: In fetuses with isolated CDH, the mediastinal shift may be quantified using mediastinal shift angle (MSA) and this US marker, similarly to the widely accepted and used US prenatal prognostic indicators (LHR and O/E LHR), seems to reliably predict survival.

Short-term neurodevelopmental outcome of babies operated on for low-risk esophageal atresia: a pilot study.

Data on the neurodevelopmental outcome of esophageal atresia (EA) survivors are scarce, controversial, and based on small samples. This is an observational prospective longitudinal study on a selected cohort of low-risk EA survivors. We considered a low-risk EA survivor a patient with the following characteristics: gestational age >32 weeks, no long gap, no genetic or chromosomic anomaly associated with neurodevelopmental delay, and no further major surgical congenital anomalies. Infants were evaluated with scales derived from the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development - 3rd Edition at 6 and 12 months, with a score of 100 considered normal for each scale. Analysis of variance was used to assess differences of cognitive and motor development. Linear regression was used to assess the impact of the following clinical and sociodemographic variables: gender, birthweight, gestational age, length of hospital stay, number of surgeries and number of esophageal dilatations during first hospitalization, days of mechanical ventilation, weight at follow up, number of surgeries and esophageal dilatations at follow up, parental age, educational level, and socioeconomic status. Thirty children form the object of the study. The mean (standard deviation [SD]) cognitive scale's score was 93.7 (7.5) and 98.2 (9.6) at 6 and 12 months, respectively (P < 0.05). The mean (SD) motor scale's score was 97.6 (9.3) and 98.0 (12.1) at 6 and 12 months, respectively (P = n.s.). Children with a body weight <5° percentile at 12 months showed a mean (SD) cognitive score significantly lower when compared with those with a body weight >5° percentile: 88.8 (6.3) and 100.5 (8.9), respectively. At 12 months, children with unemployed mothers had a mean (SD) motor score significantly lower when compared with those in the other socioeconomic classes: 87.7 (9.8) and 100.6 (12.4), respectively. In conclusion, parents of babies operated on for low-risk EA can be reassured about neurodevelopmental outcome at least up to 1 year of age. When offering a multidisciplinary follow-up program, underweight patients should deserve particular attention to promote their quality of life and support their global development.

Long-gap esophageal atresia: traction-growth and anastomosis - before and beyond.

Long-gap esophageal atresia (LGEA) is still a major surgical challenge. Options for esophageal reconstruction include the use of native esophagus or esophageal replacement with stomach, colon, or small intestine. Nonetheless, there is a consensus among most pediatric surgeons that the preservation of the native esophagus is associated with better postoperative outcomes. Thus, every effort should be made to conserve the native esophagus. The present study is aimed at critically reporting our experience focused on a standardized protocol based on the preoperative assessment of the gap in all cases and reviewing the present literature because no consensus is available regarding many aspects of LGEA (from definition to treatment). All newborn infants treated since 1995 for esophageal atresia (EA), regardless of type, were included in the present study. Identification of LGEA patients (gap ≥3 vertebral bodies) was performed based on preoperative esophageal gap measurement. The selected patients were grouped based on EA type (A/B vs. C/D) and whether they were referred from an outside institution or not. Postoperative outcome was compared. Statistical analysis was performed with the Fisher's exact test and Mann-Whitney test as appropriate, with P < 0.05 considered statistically significant. Two hundred and nineteen patients have been consecutively treated between 1995 and 2012 with the following EA subtypes: type: A 25 (11.4%); B 6 (2.7%); C 182 (83.1%); D 3 (1.4%); E 3 (1.4%). Fifty-seven patients (26%) were classified as LGEA: type A-B, 31 (54.4%); type C-D, 26 (45.6%). Twenty seven (47%) of these patients were referred after at least one failed attempt at esophageal correction: type A-B, 15 (55%); type C-D, 12 (45%). Only one patient ultimately required esophageal substitution, with an overall survival rate of 94%. A standardized perioperative protocol enhances the possibility of preserving the native esophagus in cases of LGEA. Gap measurement can be accurately defined before surgery in all patients with EA. Esophageal anastomosis (either immediate or delayed repair) is almost always feasible; esophageal substitution should only be considered after a rigorous attempt at achieving end-to-end esophageal anastomosis.

Pulmonary hypertension in neonates with high-risk congenital diaphragmatic hernia does not affect mid-term outcome.

PURPOSE: Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) presents with a broad spectrum of severity, depending on the degree of pulmonary hypoplasia and persistent pulmonary hypertension (PPH). It is currently not clear whether pulmonary hypertension may affect late morbidity. Aim of the present study was to evaluate the influence of PPH on mid-term morbidity in high-risk CDH survivors. METHODS: All high-risk (prenatal diagnosis and/or respiratory symptoms within 6 h of life) CDH survivors, treated between 2004 and 2008 in our Department were followed up in a multidisciplinary outpatient clinic as part of a longitudinal prospective study. Auxological, gastroesophageal, pulmonary and orthopedic evaluations were done at specific time-points (at 6, 12, and 24 months of age). Patients were grouped depending on the presence/absence of pulmonary hypertension (defined by expert pediatric cardiologists after echocardiography). Paired t-test and Fisher's exact test were used as appropriate. P < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: 70 survivors out of a total of 95 high-risk CDH infants treated in our Department attended our follow-up clinic and were prospectively evaluated. 17 patients were excluded from the present study because no clear data was available regarding the presence/absence of PPH during the perinatal period. Moreover, 9 infants were not enrolled because they did not reach at least 6 months of age. A total of 44 survivors were finally enrolled since they met the inclusion criteria. 26 infants did not present with PPH during the first hospital admission, while 18 had PPH. The 2 groups did not differ with regard to any of the outcomes considered at follow-up (p > 0.2). CONCLUSION: In our cohort of high-risk CDH survivors, PPH was not found to affect late sequelae at mid-term follow-up. This may indicate that postnatal pulmonary development is not (always) influenced by perinatal PPH. Nevertheless, a longer follow-up and more patients are needed to properly quantify possible late problems in high-risk CDH survivors with associated neonatal PPH.

Effectiveness of primary inguinal orchiopexy as treatment of non-palpable testes in the first two years of age.

AIM: The best treatment of non-palpable testes is currently argument of debate. The aim of present study was to describe authors' experience in surgical treatment with inguinal standard orchidopexy of non-palpable testes. METHODS: In the last 17 years we have treated 2002 cryptorchid testes, among these 327 (16.33%) were non palpable. Age and distribution of cryptorchid testes was: 0-1 y (165 NPT), 1-2 y (84 NPT), 2-5 y (43 NPT), 5-10 y (16 NPT) and >10 y (19 NPT). RESULTS: Non-palpable testes were diagnosed and treated earlier (76.14% in the first two years). At surgical examination 204 (62.38%) were intrabdominal, 80 (24.46%) were atrophic and 43 (13.14%) vanishing. Among atrophic testes 54 (67.5%) were intracanicular, 21 (26.5%) were at the external inguinal ring, 4 (5%) were intrabdominal and 1 (1.25%) ectopic; among vanishing testes 22 (51.16%) were intrabdominal, 14 (32.55%) intracanicular and 7 (16.27%) at the external ring of inguinal canal. CONCLUSION: Atrophic and vanishing testes were in intrabdominal location in 26 cases: only in these cases (7.95% of all non palpable testes) laparoscopy should have avoided inguinal surgery. Inguinal standard orchiopexy performed as day-surgery with general anaesthesia associated to caudal analgesia should be considered effective and less invasive than laparoscopic approach.

[A rare case of esophageal atresia type I]. / Eccezionale caso di atresia esofagea di tipo I.

An extremely rare case of type A esophageal atresia is reported. The baby girl patient born spontaneously after a 38-week pregnancy, was diagnosed prenatally with suspected type A esophageal atresia. Diagnosis was confirmed at birth by chest and abdominal X-ray. As per protocol, a naso-esophageal tube was positioned in aspiration and a Stamm gastrostomy made for nutritional purposes. Evaluation of the distance between blind pouches at one month of life showed they were overlapping. At intervention the pouches were found to be united by a fibrous bridge about 1.5 cm long. Anastomosis was carried out with ease. The postoperative course was trouble-free. On the X day the baby girl was being fed completely per os. Histolo-gical examination of the fibrous residue excluded the presence of a mucosa-lined lumen. X-ray examination of the esophageal-gastric passage, one month after the operation, showed the smooth transit of the contrast medium and an adequate anastomotic lumen. At follow-up, at the age of 9 months, the baby was growing normally and being fed per os with a diet appropriate for her age; no oesophageal dilatation was necessary. Type A oesophageal atresias are long-gap forms: they are treated with direct anastomosis after the blind pouches come together spontaneously in the first four months of life. Stress is laid on the rarity of the case. According to Kluth's classification of 1976, this form was described by Mason in 1855 and Jlott in 1905 on the basis of autopsy findings. A review of the literature did not show any similar clinical cases.