Amplification of the BRCA2 pathway gene EMSY in sporadic breast cancer is related to negative outcome.

DNA amplification at band q13 of chromosome 11 is common in breast cancer, and CCND1 and EMS1 remain the strongest candidate genes. However, amplification patterns are consistent with the existence of four cores of amplification, suggesting the involvement of additional genes. Here we present evidence strongly suggesting the involvement of the recently characterized EMSY gene in the formation of the telomeric amplicon. EMSY maps at 11q13.5, 100 kb centromeric to the GARP gene, which has been mapped within the core of the distal amplicon. The EMSY protein was shown to interact with BRCA2 and has a role in chromatin remodeling. This makes EMSY a strong candidate oncogene for the 11q13.5 amplicon. DNA amplification was studied in a total of 940 primary breast tumors and 39 breast cancer cell lines. Amplification profiles were consistent with the EMSY-GARP locus being amplified independently of CCND1 and/or EMS1. EMSY RNA expression levels were studied along with those of five other genes located at 11q13.5 by real-time quantitative PCR in the 39 cell lines and a subset of 65 tumors. EMSY overexpression correlated strongly with DNA amplification in both primary tumors and cell lines. In a subset of 296 patients, EMSY amplification was found by both uni- and multivariate analyses to correlate with shortened disease-free survival. These data indicate that EMSY is a strong candidate oncogene for the 11q13.5 amplicon.

MYEOV: a candidate gene for DNA amplification events occurring centromeric to CCND1 in breast cancer.

Rearrangements of chromosome 11q13 are frequently observed in human cancer. The 11q13 region harbors several chromosomal breakpoint clusters found in hematologic malignancies and exhibits frequent DNA amplification in carcinomas. DNA amplification patterns in breast tumors are consistent with the existence of at least 4 individual amplification units, suggesting the activation of more than 1 gene in this region. Two candidate oncogenes have been identified, CCND1 and EMS1/CORTACTIN, representing centrally localized amplification units. Genes involved in the proximal and distal amplicons remain to be identified. Recently we reported on a putative transforming gene, MYEOV, mapping 360 kb centromeric to CCND1. This gene was found to be rearranged and activated concomitantly with CCND1 in a subset of t(11;14)(q13;q32)-positive multiple myeloma (MM) cell lines. To evaluate the role of the MYEOV gene in the proximal amplification core, we tested 946 breast tumors for copy number increase of MYEOV relative to neighboring genes or markers. RNA expression levels were studied in a subset of 72 tumors for which both RNA and DNA were available. Data presented here show that the MYEOV gene is amplified in 9.5% (90/946) and abnormally expressed in 16.6% (12/72) of breast tumors. Amplification patterns showed that MYEOV was most frequently coamplified with CCND1 (74/90), although independent amplification of MYEOV could also be detected (16/90). Abnormal expression levels correlated only partially with DNA amplification. MYEOV DNA amplification correlated with estrogen and progesterone receptor-positive cancer, invasive lobular carcinoma type and axillary nodal involvement. In contrast to CCND1 amplification, no association with disease outcome could be found. Our data suggest that MYEOV is a candidate oncogene activated in the amplification core located proximal to CCND1.

Involvement of ATM missense variants and mutations in a series of unselected breast cancer cases.

It has been proposed that women carrying heterozygous mutations of the ATM gene could be at increased risk of developing breast cancer. However, data in the literature are contrasting and no firm conclusion has been reached. Our aim was to verify whether ATM inactivation could play a role in breast tumor development. Following the classical tumor suppressor inactivation scheme, tumors showing loss of heterozygosity (LOH) at the ATM locus should present an increased proportion of mutated ATM forms. We screened a cohort of 173 nonselected primary breast tumors for LOH in a 4 cM region at 11q23 spanning the ATM gene. We analyzed 25 tumors presenting LOH within the ATM locus for mutations in the ATM coding sequence using an RT-PCR-SSCP approach. Five patients were found to bear a coding missense variant, out of which four corresponded to a frequent polymorphism in exon 39. One patient presented a previously unreported variant in exon 19 (2614C>T) resulting in a nonconservative change (Pro>Ser) at aa 872. This variant was not found in any of the other 172 patients nor in 63 healthy controls tested, indicating that it is a rare ATM variant. LOH involved the ATM wild-type allele in the tumor presenting variant 2614. However, because the ATM gene presents a relatively large number of rare coding polymorphism it is difficult, in the absence of familial data, to be conclusive on the significance of this variant. Searching for further variants in exons 19 and 39 in the whole set of 173 breast tumors, we found one tumor showing an acquired deletion of four bases in the ATM gene. Somatic mutations affecting the ATM gene thus seem rare in breast cancer. In our cohort of breast cancer patients, tumors presenting LOH at the ATM locus did not show an increased frequency of sequence variants. Furthermore, allelic imbalance profiles in a 4-cM region of chromosome arm 11q spanning the ATM locus revealed that hot spots of LOH were more likely to correspond to a region localized telomeric to the gene. Therefore, these data suggest that other target genes for genetic inactivation exist in the 11q23 region.