Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Drugs Exp Clin Res ; 18(10): 427-30, 1992.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1306155

RESUMO

The authors report the preliminary results of an experience of treatment with clarythromycin in Chlamydia trachomatis endocervicitis/endourethritis; 100% of 51 outpatients treated had negative ELISA results 7-10 days after the end of treatment with clarythromycin 500 mg. b.i.d. for 7 days. Among 64 female outpatients with chlamydial cervicitis treated with erythromycin 1 g b.i.d. for 7 days, 88% were negative at ELISA at the same intervals after therapy. The authors conclude that the efficacy of clarythromycin in this experience makes it use worthy of other and more extensive studies.


Assuntos
Infecções por Chlamydia/tratamento farmacológico , Claritromicina/uso terapêutico , Doenças dos Genitais Femininos/tratamento farmacológico , Doenças dos Genitais Masculinos/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Infecções por Chlamydia/microbiologia , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática , Feminino , Doenças dos Genitais Femininos/microbiologia , Doenças dos Genitais Masculinos/microbiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Uretrite/tratamento farmacológico , Uretrite/microbiologia , Cervicite Uterina/tratamento farmacológico , Cervicite Uterina/microbiologia
2.
Minerva Ginecol ; 43(5): 227-31, 1991 May.
Artigo em Italiano | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1881565

RESUMO

Papanicolaou smears from 100 woman with ELISA Chlamydia-positive (42) and negative (58) endocervical smears were examined. Chlamydial endocellular inclusions were found in 3 ELISA positive and 2 negative smears, with an evident low sensitivity (7%) of cytology in the diagnosis of the endocervical infection. Furthermore, by statistical analysis it is clear that a negative test doesn't add anything to the pre-test probability (prevalence) of the infection. On the other hand a positive pap-smear adds a poor information, if compared with immunoenzimathic assay and IF staining. Thus, the Papanicolaou smear can't be considered of diagnostic value for Chlamydial infection. Furthermore, it proves unsuitable even for screening programs on high-risk patients, concerning which the immunoenzymatic assay appears, as previously affirmed, the most suitable effort.


Assuntos
Infecções por Chlamydia/diagnóstico , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática , Teste de Papanicolaou , Cervicite Uterina/microbiologia , Esfregaço Vaginal , Infecções por Chlamydia/enzimologia , Infecções por Chlamydia/patologia , Feminino , Humanos , Cervicite Uterina/diagnóstico , Cervicite Uterina/patologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...