Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Chirurgie (Heidelb) ; 95(1): 10-19, 2024 Jan.
Artigo em Alemão | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38157070

RESUMO

The treatment of complex midline hernias remains a particular challenge. The currently refined knowledge of the anatomy in the cadaver laboratory and advancing clinical experience have changed our present approach. The aim of this review is to present a description of the updated surgical procedures and outcomes. We favor the retromuscular or preperitoneal layer for mesh implantation, including the Rives-Stoppa procedure (sublay mesh) and posterior component separation with the Madrid modification. We operated on 334 complex midline incisional hernias: 6.3% retromuscular preperitoneal, 15% after Rives-Stoppa, 2.4% anterior component separation and 76% posterior component separation. A bridging procedure was used in 31%. A complication occurred in 35.3%, most of which were wound healing disorders (SSO). The average length of hospital stay was 7.2 days. We recorded a very low incidence of long-term complications: 3.3% recurrence, 0.9% chronic pain (daily use of pain medication), 6% bulging, 1.8% chronic seroma and 2.6% chronic mesh infection. Despite the associated morbidity, retromuscular/preperitoneal treatment offers excellent long-term results.


Assuntos
Parede Abdominal , Hérnia Ventral , Hérnia Incisional , Humanos , Hérnia Incisional/cirurgia , Hérnia Incisional/complicações , Parede Abdominal/cirurgia , Hérnia Ventral/cirurgia , Hérnia Ventral/etiologia , Músculos Abdominais , Telas Cirúrgicas/efeitos adversos
2.
Cir Esp (Engl Ed) ; 101 Suppl 1: S40-S45, 2023 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38042592

RESUMO

Abdominal wall hernias are common entities that represent important issues. Retromuscular repair and component separation for complex abdominal wall defects are considered useful treatments according to both short and long-term outcomes. However, failure of surgical techniques may occur. The aim of this study is to analyze results of surgical treatment for hernia recurrence after prior retromuscular or posterior components separation. We have retrospectively reviewed patient charts from a prospectively maintained database. This study was conducted in three different hospitals of the Madrid region with surgical units dedicated to abdominal wall reconstruction. We have included in the database 520 patients between December 2014 and December 2021. Fifty-one patients complied with the criteria to be included in this study. We should consider offering surgical treatment for hernia recurrence after retromuscular repair or posterior components separation. However, the results might be associated to increased peri-operative complications.


Assuntos
Músculos Abdominais , Hérnia Ventral , Humanos , Músculos Abdominais/cirurgia , Hérnia Ventral/cirurgia , Estudos de Coortes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Herniorrafia/métodos , Telas Cirúrgicas , Recidiva
3.
Surgery ; 160(5): 1358-1366, 2016 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27372521

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The use of prophylactic mesh to prevent incisional hernia is becoming increasingly common in midline laparotomies and colostomies. The incidence of incisional hernia after subcostal laparotomies is lower than after midline incisions. Nevertheless, the treatment of subcostal incisional hernia is considered to be more complex. Currently, there are no published data about mesh augmentation procedures to close these laparotomies. METHODS: This was a longitudinal, prospective, cohort study of patients undergoing a bilateral subcostal laparotomy in elective operations. The mesh group was a group of patients operated consecutively between 2011 and 2013 with a prophylactic self-fixation mesh. The control group was selected from a retrospective analysis of patients operated between 2009 and 2010 and closed with a conventional protocol of 2-layer closure. The incidence of incisional hernia was recorded both clinically and radiologically for 2 years. RESULTS: A total of 57 patients were included in the control group and 58 in the mesh group. Most patients underwent gastric, hepatic, and pancreatic operations. Both groups were homogeneous in terms of their clinical and demographic characteristics. Operative time and hospital stay were similar in both groups. Both groups had a comparable rate of local and systemic complications. Ten patients (17.5%) in the control group developed an incisional hernia, and only 1 patient (1.7%) in the mesh group developed an incisional hernia (P = .0006). CONCLUSION: The incidence of incisional hernia after a conventional closure of bilateral subcostal laparotomy is significant. The use of a mesh augmentation procedure for closing bilateral subcostal laparotomies is safe and may reduce the incidence of incisional hernia.


Assuntos
Herniorrafia/métodos , Hérnia Incisional/prevenção & controle , Laparotomia/efeitos adversos , Laparotomia/métodos , Telas Cirúrgicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Técnicas de Fechamento de Ferimentos Abdominais , Adulto , Estudos de Coortes , Diafragma , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/métodos , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Hérnia Incisional/etiologia , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Valores de Referência , Estatísticas não Paramétricas , Resultado do Tratamento , Cicatrização/fisiologia
4.
Ann Surg ; 261(5): 876-81, 2015 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25575254

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To reduce the incidence of incisional hernia (IH) in colorectal surgery by implanting a mesh on the overlay position. BACKGROUND: The incidence of IH in colorectal surgery may be as high as 40%. IH causes severe health and cosmetic problems, and its repair increases health care costs. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Randomized, controlled, prospective trial. Patients undergoing any colorectal procedure (both elective and emergency) through a midline laparotomy were divided into 2 groups. The abdomen was closed with an identical technique in both groups, except for the implantation of an overlay large-pore polypropylene mesh in the study group. Patients were followed up clinically and radiologically for 24 months. RESULTS: A total of 107 patients were included: 53 in the study group and 54 in the control group. Both groups were homogeneous, except for a higher incidence of diabetes in the mesh group. There were 20 emergency procedures in the study group and 17 in the control group. There were no statistical differences in surgical site infections, seromas, or mortality between the groups (33.3%, 13.8%, and 3.7% in the control group and 18.9%, 13.2%, and 3.8% in the study group). No mesh rejection was reported. The incidence of IH was 17 of 54 (31.5%) in the control group and 6 of 53 (11.3%) in the study group (P = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of IH is high in patients undergoing elective or emergency surgery for colorectal diseases. The addition of a prophylactic large-pore polypropylene mesh on the overlay position decreases the incidence of IH without adding morbidity.


Assuntos
Cirurgia Colorretal/efeitos adversos , Hérnia Abdominal/prevenção & controle , Laparotomia/efeitos adversos , Telas Cirúrgicas , Parede Abdominal/cirurgia , Idoso , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/efeitos adversos , Emergências , Feminino , Hérnia Abdominal/etiologia , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Polipropilenos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Técnicas de Sutura
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...