Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 28
Filtrar
1.
Am J Cardiol ; 155: 1-8, 2021 09 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34281673

RESUMO

With aging of the population, cardiovascular conditions (CC) are increasingly common in individuals undergoing PCI for stable angina pectoris (AP). It is unknown if the overall burden of CCs associates with diminished symptom improvement after PCI for stable AP. We prospectively administered validated surveys assessing AP, dyspnea, and depression to patients undergoing PCI for stable AP at our institution, 2016-2018. The association of CC burden and symptoms at 30-days post-PCI was assessed via linear mixed effects models. Included individuals (N = 121; mean age 68 ± 10 years; response rate = 42%) were similar to non-included individuals. At baseline, greater CC burden was associated with worse dyspnea, depression, and physical limitations due to AP, but not AP frequency or quality of life. PCI was associated with small improvements in AP and dyspnea (p ≤ 0.001 for both), but not depression (p = 0.15). After multivariable adjustment, including for baseline symptoms, CC burden was associated with a greater improvement in AP physical limitations (p = 0.01) and depression (p = 0.002), albeit small, but not other symptom domains (all p ≥ 0.05). In patients undergoing PCI for stable AP, increasing CC burden was associated with worse dyspnea, depression, and AP physical limitations at baseline. An increasing number of CCs was associated with greater improvements, though small, in AP physical limitations and depression. In conclusion, the overall number of cardiovascular conditions should not be used to exclude patients from PCI for stable AP on the basis of an expectation of less symptom improvement.


Assuntos
Angina Estável/cirurgia , Nível de Saúde , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/métodos , Qualidade de Vida , Sistema de Registros , Idoso , Angina Estável/diagnóstico , Angiografia Coronária , Progressão da Doença , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo
2.
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes ; 14(1): e007040, 2021 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33435732

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Recent evidence from randomized controlled trials has raised concerns about the long-term safety of paclitaxel-coated peripheral devices used for femoropopliteal artery revascularization. In response to a call for more real-world data on the safety of these devices, the SAFE-PAD study (Safety Assessment of Femoropopliteal Endovascular treatment with Paclitaxel-coated Devices) was designed with input from the Food and Drug Administration to provide a long-term, comprehensive evaluation of the mortality risk associated with paclitaxel-coated devices among Medicare beneficiaries. METHODS AND RESULTS: SAFE-PAD is an observational cohort study of fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries that underwent femoropopliteal artery revascularization with either a drug-coated device or nondrug-coated device from 2015 through 2018. All patients age 66 years or older who underwent revascularization will be identified using a combination of International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision procedural codes, Current Procedural Terminology codes, and Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System C-codes. The safety end point of all-cause death will be updated semiannually and continued until the median duration of follow-up surpasses 5 years. Sub-group analyses will be conducted by device type, patient characteristics, and procedural setting. Registration: The SAFE-PAD study has been registered on URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04496544. CONCLUSIONS: The SAFE-PAD study will evaluate the long-term safety of drug-coated devices compared with nondrug-coated devices for femoropopliteal artery revascularization among a broad, real-world population of patients with peripheral artery disease.


Assuntos
Angioplastia com Balão , Idoso , Fármacos Cardiovasculares , Materiais Revestidos Biocompatíveis , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Medicare , Doença Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico , Doença Arterial Periférica/terapia , Artéria Poplítea/cirurgia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos
3.
Brief Bioinform ; 22(2): 2141-2150, 2021 03 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32367110

RESUMO

Identification of new drug-target interactions (DTIs) is an important but a time-consuming and costly step in drug discovery. In recent years, to mitigate these drawbacks, researchers have sought to identify DTIs using computational approaches. However, most existing methods construct drug networks and target networks separately, and then predict novel DTIs based on known associations between the drugs and targets without accounting for associations between drug-protein pairs (DPPs). To incorporate the associations between DPPs into DTI modeling, we built a DPP network based on multiple drugs and proteins in which DPPs are the nodes and the associations between DPPs are the edges of the network. We then propose a novel learning-based framework, 'graph convolutional network (GCN)-DTI', for DTI identification. The model first uses a graph convolutional network to learn the features for each DPP. Second, using the feature representation as an input, it uses a deep neural network to predict the final label. The results of our analysis show that the proposed framework outperforms some state-of-the-art approaches by a large margin.


Assuntos
Aprendizado Profundo , Sistemas de Liberação de Medicamentos , Redes Neurais de Computação , Algoritmos , Humanos
4.
EuroIntervention ; 17(5): e380-e387, 2021 Aug 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32863243

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In-stent restenosis (ISR) is highly prevalent and leads to repeat revascularisation. Long-term implications of ISR are poorly understood. AIMS: This study aimed to evaluate the long-term outcomes of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ISR. METHODS: National Cardiovascular Data Registry CathPCI records for individuals aged ≥65 years undergoing PCI from July 2009 to December 2014 were linked to Medicare claims. Baseline characteristics and long-term rates of death, myocardial infarction (MI), repeat revascularisation including target vessel revascularisation (TVR), and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) were compared between ISR PCI versus de novo lesion PCI. RESULTS: Of 653,304 individuals, 10.2% underwent ISR PCI and 89.8% underwent de novo lesion PCI. The median duration of follow-up was 825 days (quartile 1: 352 days-quartile 3: 1,379 days). The frequency of MACCE (55.6% vs 45.0%; p<0.001), all-cause mortality (27.8% vs 25.5%; p<0.001), MI (19.0% vs 12.3%; p<0.001), repeat revascularisation (31.9% vs 18.6%; p<0.001), TVR (22.4% vs 8.0%; p<0.001), and stroke (8.8% vs 8.3%; p=0.005) was higher after ISR PCI. After multivariable adjustment, ISR PCI remained associated with worse long-term outcomes than after de novo lesion PCI (hazard ratio [HR] for MACCE 1.24 [95% CI: 1.22, 1.26], mortality 1.07 [95% CI: 1.05, 1.09], MI 1.44 [95% CI: 1.40, 1.48], repeat revascularisation 1.55 [95% CI: 1.51, 1.59], and TVR 2.50 [95% CI: 2.42, 2.58]). CONCLUSIONS: ISR PCI was common and was associated with a significantly higher risk of recurrent long-term major ischaemic events compared to patients undergoing de novo lesion PCI. There remains a need for new strategies to minimise ISR.


Assuntos
Doença da Artéria Coronariana , Reestenose Coronária , Stents Farmacológicos , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Idoso , Reestenose Coronária/epidemiologia , Reestenose Coronária/terapia , Humanos , Medicare , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
5.
Circulation ; 142(3): 203-213, 2020 07 21.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32436390

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Whether passively collected data can substitute for adjudicated outcomes to reproduce the magnitude and direction of treatment effect observed in cardiovascular clinical trials is not well known. METHODS: We linked adults ≥65 years of age in the HiR (US CoreValve Pivotal High Risk) and SURTAVI trials (Surgical or Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Intermediate-Risk Patients) to 100% Medicare inpatient claims, January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2016. Primary (eg, death and stroke) and secondary trial end points were compared across treatment arms (eg, transcatheter aortic valve replacement [TAVR] versus surgical aortic valve replacement [SAVR]) using trial-adjudicated outcomes versus outcomes derived from claims at 1 year (HiR) or 2 years (SURTAVI). RESULTS: Among 600 linked HiR participants (linkage rate, 80.0%), the rate of the trial's primary end point of all-cause mortality occurred in 13.7% of patients receiving TAVR and 16.4% of patients receiving SAVR at 1 year by using both trial data (hazard ratio, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.65-1.09]; P=0.33) and claims data (hazard ratio, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.66-1.11]; P=0.34; interaction P value=0.80). Noninferiority of TAVR relative to SAVR was seen by using both trial- and claims-based outcomes (Pnoninferiority<0.001 for both). Among 1005 linked SURTAVI trial participants (linkage rate, 60.5%), the trial's primary end point was 12.9% for TAVR and 13.1% for SAVR using trial data (hazard ratio, 1.08 [95% CI, 0.79-1.48]; P=0.90), and 11.3% for TAVR and 12.5% for SAVR patients using claims data (hazard ratio, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.73-1.41]; P=0.58; interaction P value=0.89). TAVR was noninferior to SAVR when compared using both trial and claims (Pnoninferiority<0.001 for both). Rates of procedural secondary outcomes (eg, aortic valve reintervention, pacemaker rates) were more closely concordant between trial and claims data than nonprocedural outcomes (eg, stroke, bleeding, cardiogenic shock). CONCLUSIONS: In the HiR and SURTAVI trials, ascertainment of trial primary end points using claims reproduced both the magnitude and direction of treatment effect in comparison with adjudicated event data, but nonfatal and nonprocedural secondary outcomes were not as well reproduced. Use of claims to substitute for adjudicated outcomes in traditional trial treatment comparisons may be valid and feasible for all-cause mortality and certain procedural outcomes but may be less suitable for other end points.


Assuntos
Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter/efeitos adversos , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter/métodos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
6.
Am J Cardiol ; 125(9): 1317-1323, 2020 05 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32147090

RESUMO

Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) improves outcomes compared with medical treatment alone. Risk stratification for outcomes following AF ablation remains an important area of uncertainty. This analysis evaluated the association between frailty and outcomes following AF ablation. We evaluated US inpatients receiving AF ablation between January 1, 2016 and December 1, 2016 using Medicare fee-for-service billing codes. Diagnosis codes were used to calculate patients' Hospital Frailty Risk Score, with the cohort divided according to established cut-points of low (<5), intermediate (5 to 15), and high (>15) risk for frailty. The primary outcome was survival. Among 5,070 in patients treated with catheter ablation (mean age 74.9 ± 6.8 years, 51.1% female), 38.6% were defined as frail with a Hospital Frailty Risk Score >5, including 8.3% at high risk. Mortality rates (up to 630 days) were 5.8% in the low-risk group, 23.4% in the intermediate-risk group, and 42.2% in the high-risk group (log-rank p values <0.001 for comparison between categories). In restricted cubic spline regression analysis, the adjusted hazard ratios for long-term mortality monotonically increased with increasing values of the Hospital Frailty Risk Score (adjusted hazard ratio 1.065, 95% confidence interval 1.054 to 1.077). In secondary end points, frailty was independently associated with length of stay, postprocedure 30-day mortality, 30-day readmission and postdischarge 30-day mortality rates. In conclusion, frailty as assessed by a claims-based score is common in inpatient recipients of AF ablation, and provides risk stratification for mortality and other key clinical outcomes.


Assuntos
Fibrilação Atrial/complicações , Fibrilação Atrial/cirurgia , Ablação por Cateter , Fragilidade/complicações , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Fragilidade/diagnóstico , Humanos , Masculino , Medição de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento
7.
Heart ; 106(6): 441-446, 2020 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31857352

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) has been used to identify individuals who are likely to benefit from percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for stable ischaemic heart disease. However, whether physicians reliably grade PCI appropriateness and whether AUC categories stratify symptomatic improvement in real-world practice are unclear. METHODS: Patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) for angina (Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ-7)), dyspnoea (Rose Dyspnea Scale (RDS)) and depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2)) were collected on patients undergoing elective coronary angiography at an academic medical centre. Retrospectively, two physicians independently determined PCI appropriateness by the AUC criteria. RESULTS: Inter-rater agreement on appropriateness was moderate (κ=0.48, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.63). Of PCI procedures evaluated, 57 (47.1%) were appropriate (A-PCI), 62 (51.2%) were maybe appropriate (MA-PCI) and 2 (1.6%) were rarely appropriate. At baseline, A-PCI compared with MA-PCI patients had worse RDS scores (2.0 vs 1.2, p=0.01). At 30 days, the change in SAQ-7 summary score was similar between groups (A-PCI vs MA-PCI, +27.1 vs +20.7, p=0.11). The mean change in RDS score was greater in A-PCI than MA-PCI (-1.0 vs -0.5, p for group by time interaction=0.03). PHQ-2 scores were similar and did not improve at 30 days. CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing PCI with PROMs collected before and 30 days after PCI, similar improvements in angina were observed regardless of appropriateness. Inter-rater agreement on PCI appropriateness was only moderate. Use of PROMs may improve reliability of physician assessments of PCI appropriateness.


Assuntos
Isquemia Miocárdica/cirurgia , Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Padrões de Prática Médica/normas , Utilização de Procedimentos e Técnicas/normas , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos
8.
Circ Cardiovasc Interv ; 12(11): e008231, 2019 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31694411

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Cerebrovascular events (CVEs) are devastating complications after aortic valve replacement. We assessed whether billing claims accurately identify CVEs in place of clinical event adjudication in structural heart disease trials. METHODS: Adult participants in the US CoreValve High Risk and SURTAVI trials (Surgical or Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement in Intermediate-Risk Patients) were linked to Medicare inpatient claims from January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2016. Claims consistent with CVEs within 14 days of a similar trial-adjudicated CVE were considered a match. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of International Classification of Diseases,Ninth andTenthRevisions, Clinical Modification billing codes for cerebrovascular disease were determined against trial-defined CVEs as the criterion standard. Kaplan-Meier estimates of claims-defined versus trial-defined CVEs were compared. RESULTS: Among 4230 linked trial participants (linkage rate 79.8%), 550 (13.0%) sustained 630 adjudicated CVEs over a 5-year follow-up period. Linked and nonlinked individuals were similar. An algorithm using 4 International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes (434.91, 434.11, 433.11, and 997.02) had a sensitivity of 60.9%, specificity of 99.0%, positive predictive value of 86.5%, and negative predictive value of 95.8% for identifying a trial-adjudicated ischemic stroke. An algorithm using 3 International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification codes (I63.9, I63.40, I63.49) had a sensitivity of 66.7%, specificity of 99.4%, positive predictive value of 88.9%, and negative predictive value of 97.6%. CONCLUSIONS: In linked clinical trial and Medicare claims data, 4 International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification and 3 International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification billing codes identified half of trial-adjudicated CVEs during follow-up with high specificity and predictive value, but imperfect sensitivity. Although low sensitivity may limit the use of claims to substitute for traditional trial outcomes to identify CVEs, high specificity suggests claims could be used to trigger evaluation of neurological events, potentially improving the efficiency of the evaluation of techniques and devices designed to reduce such events.


Assuntos
Demandas Administrativas em Assistência à Saúde , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Isquemia Encefálica/epidemiologia , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca/efeitos adversos , Ataque Isquêmico Transitório/epidemiologia , Medicare , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/epidemiologia , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter/efeitos adversos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Valva Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagem , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagem , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/epidemiologia , Isquemia Encefálica/diagnóstico , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Humanos , Ataque Isquêmico Transitório/diagnóstico , Masculino , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/diagnóstico , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
9.
JAMA Cardiol ; 4(11): 1084-1091, 2019 11 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31553402

RESUMO

Importance: The addition of a claims-based frailty metric to traditional comorbidity-based risk-adjustment models for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), heart failure (HF), and pneumonia improves the prediction of 30-day mortality and readmission. This may have important implications for hospitals that tend to care for frail populations and participate in Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services value-based payment programs, which use these risk-adjusted metrics to determine reimbursement. Objective: To determine whether the addition of frailty measures to traditional comorbidity-based risk-adjustment models improved prediction of outcomes for patients with AMI, HF, and pneumonia. Design, Setting, and Participants: A nationwide cohort study included Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries 65 years and older in the United States between January 1 and December 1, 2016. Analysis began August 2018. Main Outcomes and Measures: Rates of mortality within 30 days of admission and 30 days of discharge, as well as 30-day readmission rates by frailty group. We evaluated the incremental effect of adding the Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) to current comorbidity-based risk-adjustment models for 30-day outcomes across all conditions. Results: For 785 127 participants, there were 166 200 hospitalizations [21.2%] for AMI, 348 619 [44.4%] for HF, and 270 308 [34.4%] for pneumonia. The mean (SD) age at the time of hospitalization was 79.2 (8.9) years; 656 315 (83.6%) were white and 402 639 (51.3%) were women. The mean (SD) HFRS was 7.3 (7.4) for patients with AMI, 10.8 (8.3) for patients with HF, and 8.2 (5.7) for patients with pneumonia. Among patients hospitalized for AMI, an HFRS more than 15 (compared with an HFRS <5) was associated with a higher risk of 30-day postadmission mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 3.6; 95% CI, 3.4-3.8), 30-day postdischarge mortality (aOR, 4.0; 95% CI, 3.7-4.3), and 30-day readmission (aOR, 3.0; 95% CI, 2.9-3.1) after multivariable adjustment for age, sex, race, and comorbidities. Similar patterns were observed for patients hospitalized with HF (30-day postadmission mortality: aOR, 3.5; 95% CI, 3.4-3.7; 30-day postdischarge mortality: aOR, 3.5; 95% CI, 3.3-3.6; and 30-day readmission: aOR, 2.9; 95% CI, 2.8-3.0) and among patients with pneumonia (30-day postadmission mortality: aOR, 2.5; 95% CI, 2.3-2.6; 30-day postdischarge mortality: aOR, 3.0; 95% CI, 2.9-3.2; and 30-day readmission: aOR, 2.8; 95% CI, 2.7-2.9). The addition of HFRS to traditional comorbidity-based risk-prediction models improved discrimination to predict outcomes for all 3 conditions. Conclusions and Relevance: Among Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries, frailty as measured by the HFRS was associated with mortality and readmissions among patients hospitalized for AMI, HF, or pneumonia. The addition of HFRS to traditional comorbidity-based risk-prediction models improved the prediction of outcomes for all 3 conditions.


Assuntos
Fragilidade/mortalidade , Insuficiência Cardíaca/mortalidade , Mortalidade Hospitalar/tendências , Infarto do Miocárdio/mortalidade , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Pneumonia/mortalidade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Avaliação Geriátrica/métodos , Insuficiência Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Medicare/economia , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Análise Multivariada , Infarto do Miocárdio/diagnóstico , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
11.
Int J Cardiol ; 292: 68-72, 2019 10 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31255451

RESUMO

This study aimed to evaluate changes in volume, risk profile, and outcomes among elderly individuals undergoing isolated aortic valve replacement (AVR) after TAVR approval in the United States. Retrospective cohort study of patients ≥65 years old with at least one procedural code for isolated SAVR or TAVR among the Medicare beneficiaries between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2014. A total of 137,563 hospitalizations for isolated AVR between 2009 and 2014 were included (SAVR: 102,968 [74.9%]; TAVR: 34,595 [25.1%]). Overall AVR volumes increased by 21.8% per year after TAVR introduction, compared with 2.3% prior (p ≪ 0.001). Changes in SAVR volumes were similar both before and after TAVR introduction, (2.3% per year growth before vs. 2.1% after, p = 0.24). Although patient risk profiles increased among the AVR population (predicted 30-day mortality 4.0% in 2009 vs. 5.4% in 2014; p for trend =0.048), observed 30-day mortality (4.0% in 2009 vs. 3.9% in 2014; p for trend =0.96) and 1-year mortality (10.8% in 2009 to 12.2% in 2014; p for trend =0.069) rates remained stable. Among elderly U.S. patients enrolled in the Medicare, the introduction and the dissemination in the early phase of TAVR was associated with an expansion of AVR to high risk patients, without an observed reduction in the use of SAVR. This expansion was associated with similar mortality among all AVR patients, despite an increase in patient risk.


Assuntos
Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca/estatística & dados numéricos , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca/tendências , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/mortalidade , Utilização de Procedimentos e Técnicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Utilização de Procedimentos e Técnicas/tendências , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter/estatística & dados numéricos , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos
12.
Am Heart J ; 212: 64-71, 2019 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30953936

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Randomized controlled trials are the "gold standard" for comparing the safety and efficacy of therapies but may be limited due to high costs, lack of feasibility, and difficulty enrolling "real-world" patient populations. The Extending Trial-Based Evaluations of Medical Therapies Using Novel Sources of Data (EXTEND) Study seeks to evaluate whether data collected within procedural registries and claims databases can reproduce trial results by substituting surrogate non-trial-based variables for exposures and outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patient-level data from 2 clinical trial programs-the Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Study and the United States CoreValve Studies-will be linked to a combination of national registry, administrative claims, and health system data. The concordance between baseline and outcomes data collected within nontrial data sets and trial information, including adjudicated end point events, will be assessed. We will compare the study results obtained using these alternative data sources to those derived using trial-ascertained variables and end points using trial-adjudicated end points and covariates. CONCLUSIONS: Linkage of trials to registries and claims data represents an opportunity to use alternative data sources in place of and as adjuncts to randomized clinical trial data but requires further validation. The results of this research will help determine how these data sources can be used to improve our present and future understanding of new medical treatments.


Assuntos
Terapia Antiplaquetária Dupla/métodos , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde/provisão & distribuição , Isquemia Miocárdica/terapia , Revascularização Miocárdica/métodos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto/métodos , Sistema de Registros , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
13.
Eur Heart J ; 40(27): 2231-2239, 2019 07 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30977798

RESUMO

AIMS: We sought to identify the prevalence and related outcomes of frail individuals undergoing transcatheter mitral valve repair and transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients aged 65 and older were included in the study if they had at least one procedural code for transcatheter mitral valve repair or TAVR between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2016 in the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Medicare Provider and Review database. The Hospital Frailty Risk Score, an International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) claims-based score, was used to identify frailty and the primary outcome was all-cause 1-year mortality. A total of 3746 (11.6%) patients underwent transcatheter mitral valve repair and 28 531 (88.4%) underwent TAVR. In the transcatheter mitral valve repair and TAVR populations, respectively, there were 1903 (50.8%) and 14 938 (52.4%) patients defined as low risk for frailty (score <5), 1476 (39.4%) and 11 268 (39.5%) defined as intermediate risk (score 5-15), and 367 (9.8%) and 2325 (8.1%) defined as high risk (score >15). One-year mortality was 12.8% in low-risk patients, 29.7% in intermediate-risk patients, and 40.9% in high-risk patients undergoing transcatheter mitral valve repair (log rank P < 0.001). In patients undergoing TAVR, 1-year mortality rates were 7.6% in low-risk patients, 17.6% in intermediate-risk patients, and 30.1% in high-risk patients (log rank P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study successfully identified individuals at greater risk of short- and long-term mortality after undergoing transcatheter valve therapies in an elderly population in the USA using the ICD-10 claims-based Hospital Frailty Risk Score.


Assuntos
Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Fragilidade/complicações , Doenças das Valvas Cardíacas/complicações , Doenças das Valvas Cardíacas/cirurgia , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca/métodos , Valva Mitral/cirurgia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Medicare , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos
14.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv ; 12(7): 651-658, 2019 04 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30878475

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to examine depression prevalence among chronic total occlusion (CTO) patients and compared symptom improvement among depressed and nondepressed patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). BACKGROUND: Depression in cardiovascular patients is common, but its prevalence among CTO patients and its association with PCI response is understudied. METHODS: Among 811 patients from the OPEN-CTO (Outcomes, Patient Health Status, and Efficiency in Chronic Total Occlusion Hybrid Procedures) registry, we evaluated change in health status between baseline and 1-year post-PCI, as measured by the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) and the Rose Dyspnea Score. Depression was defined using the Personal Health Questionnaire-8. The independent association between health status and depression following PCI was assessed using multivariable regression. RESULTS: Among the 811 patients, 190 (23%) screened positive for major depression, of whom 6.3% were on antidepressant therapy at intervention. Depressed patients experienced more baseline angina, but by 1-year post-PCI they experienced greater improvements than nondepressed patients (change in SAQ Summary: 31.4 ± 22.4 vs. 24.2 ± 20.0; p < 0.001). After adjustment, baseline depressed patients had more improvement in health status (adjusted difference in SAQ Summary improvement, depressed vs. nondepressed: 5.48 ± 1.81; p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Depression is common among CTO PCI patients, but few were treated with antidepressants at baseline. Depressed patients had more severe baseline angina and significant improvement in health status after PCI. (Outcomes, Patient Health Status, and Efficiency in Chronic Total Occlusion [OPEN-CTO]; NCT02026466).


Assuntos
Afeto , Angina Pectoris/terapia , Oclusão Coronária/terapia , Depressão/psicologia , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Afeto/efeitos dos fármacos , Idoso , Angina Pectoris/diagnóstico por imagem , Angina Pectoris/epidemiologia , Antidepressivos/uso terapêutico , Doença Crônica , Oclusão Coronária/diagnóstico por imagem , Oclusão Coronária/epidemiologia , Depressão/diagnóstico , Depressão/tratamento farmacológico , Depressão/epidemiologia , Feminino , Nível de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Saúde Mental , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Sistema de Registros , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos
15.
Coron Artery Dis ; 30(3): 177-182, 2019 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30676386

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The cost-effectiveness of newer drug-eluting stents (DES) such as biodegradable-polymer or polymer-free stents with shorter dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) duration is unknown. We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of treatment with newer DES that may allow for shorter DAPT duration. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a cost-effectiveness analysis of treatment with newer DES platforms followed by 1 or 3 months of DAPT compared with standard second-generation DES followed by 6 or 12 months of DAPT in patients with stable coronary disease. A Markov model simulated distinct health states over a lifetime. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis and one-way sensitivity analyses were performed. A high-risk bleeding scenario was also evaluated. RESULTS: Among patients with typical bleeding risk, second-generation DES and 6 months of DAPT was less expensive and resulted in marginally higher quality-adjusted life years compared with other strategies. A newer DES platform and 3 months of DAPT was preferred when the risk of fatal bleeding was two times greater than baseline, or when bleeding increased long-term mortality by a factor of 1.5. In a probabilistic sensitivity analysis, second-generation DES and 6 months of DAPT was preferred in 58% of iterations, whereas in a high-risk bleeding patient scenario, a newer DES and 3 months of DAPT was preferred in 52% of iterations. CONCLUSION: A DES that allows 3 months of DAPT without increasing stent-related events is likely to be cost-effective among patients at elevated risk of bleeding, but not in patients with average bleeding risk.


Assuntos
Doença da Artéria Coronariana/economia , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/terapia , Custos de Medicamentos , Stents Farmacológicos/economia , Custos Hospitalares , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/economia , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/administração & dosagem , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/economia , Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/diagnóstico por imagem , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/mortalidade , Análise Custo-Benefício , Esquema de Medicação , Quimioterapia Combinada , Hemorragia/induzido quimicamente , Hemorragia/economia , Humanos , Cadeias de Markov , Modelos Econômicos , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/instrumentação , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/mortalidade , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/efeitos adversos , Desenho de Prótese , Qualidade de Vida , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
16.
JAMA Cardiol ; 4(1): 16-22, 2019 01 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30516798

RESUMO

Importance: Hospital outcomes for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) may be dependent on the quality of evaluation, personnel, and procedural and postprocedural care common to patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Objectives: We sought to assess whether those hospitals with better patient outcomes for surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) subsequently achieved better TAVR outcomes after launching TAVR programs. Design, Setting, and Participants: This national cohort included US patients 65 years and older. The analysis used the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' Medicare Provider and Review data collected between January 1, 2010, and September 29, 2015. Only hospitals performing at least 1 SAVR prior to September 1, 2011, and performing at least 1 TAVR after this date were included in the analysis. Data analysis was completed from June 2018 to August 2018. Interventions: Isolated aortic valve replacements. Main Outcomes and Measures: Hospital risk-adjusted 30-day mortality for SAVR in the pre-TAVR period was used as a surrogate for SAVR quality. Thirty-day and 1-year TAVR mortality rates were examined after stratification by quartile of baseline hospital risk-adjusted SAVR mortality. Results: A total of 51 924 TAVR procedures were performed in 519 hospitals, of which 19 798 were performed at hospitals in quartile 1 (the lowest risk-adjusted SAVR mortality rate), 7663 were performed in quartile 2, 10 180 were performed in quartile 3, and 14 283 were performed in quartile 4 (the highest risk-adjusted SAVR mortality rate). Observed mortality rates at 30 days consistently increased with increasing baseline hospital SAVR risk-adjusted mortality (quartile 1, 917 patients [4.6%]; quartile 2, 381 [5.0%]; quartile 3, 521 [5.1%]; quartile 4, 800 [5.6%]; P < .001). The same pattern was observed in 1-year mortality (quartile 1, 3359 [17.0%]; quartile 2, 1337 [17.5%]; quartile 3, 1852 [18.2%]; quartile 4, 2652 [18.6%]; P < .001). After multivariable analysis, compared with the lowest quartile of SAVR mortality, undergoing TAVR at a hospital with higher baseline SAVR mortality continued to be associated with higher 30-day mortality (odds ratios: quartile 2, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.87-1.21]; quartile 3, 1.13 [95% CI, 1.02-1.26]; quartile 4, 1.23 [95% CI, 1.07-1.40]; P = .02) and 1-year mortality (hazard ratios: quartile 2, 1.04 [95% CI, 0.92-1.17]; quartile 3, 1.14 [95% CI, 1.02-1.28]; quartile 4, 1.16 [95% CI, 1.05-1.28]; P = .02). Conclusions and Relevance: Hospitals with higher SAVR mortality rates also had higher short-term and long-term TAVR mortality after initiating TAVR programs. Quality of cardiac surgical care may be associated with a hospital's performance with new structural heart disease programs.


Assuntos
Estenose da Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Mortalidade Hospitalar/tendências , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter/métodos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S./estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Mortalidade , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
17.
Can J Cardiol ; 34(12): 1648-1654, 2018 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30527154

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: We sought to identify nontraditional risk factors coded in administrative claims data and evaluate their ability to improve prediction of long-term mortality in patients undergoing percutaneous mitral valve repair. METHODS: Patients undergoing transcatheter mitral valve repair using MitraClip implantation between September 28, 2010, and September 30, 2015 were identified among Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries. We used nested Cox regression models to identify claims codes predictive of long-term mortality. Four groups of variables were introduced sequentially: cardiac and noncardiac risk factors, presentation characteristics, and nontraditional risk factors. RESULTS: A total of 3782 patients from 280 clinical sites received treatment with MitraClip over the study period. During the follow-up period, 1114 (29.5%) patients died with a median follow-up time period of 13.6 (9.6 to 17.3) months. The discrimination of a model to predict long-term mortality including only cardiac risk factors was 0.58 (0.55 to 0.60). Model discrimination improved with the addition of noncardiac risk factors (c = 0.63, 0.61 to 0.65; integrated discrimination improvement [IDI] = 0.038, P < 0.001), and with the subsequent addition of presentation characteristics (c = 0.67, 0.65 to 0.69; IDI = 0.033, P < 0.001 compared with the second model). Finally, the addition of nontraditional risk factors significantly improved model discrimination (c = 0.70, 0.68 to 0.72; IDI = 0.019, P < 0.001, compared with the third model). CONCLUSIONS: Risk-prediction models, which include nontraditional risk factors as identified in claims data, can be used to predict long-term mortality risk more accurately in patients who have undergone MitraClip procedures.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/instrumentação , Insuficiência da Valva Mitral/mortalidade , Insuficiência da Valva Mitral/cirurgia , Valva Mitral/cirurgia , Medição de Risco , Idoso , Fibrilação Atrial/mortalidade , Feminino , Seguimentos , Insuficiência Cardíaca/mortalidade , Humanos , Hepatopatias/mortalidade , Masculino , Medicare , Análise Multivariada , Diálise Renal/mortalidade , Fatores de Risco , Choque/mortalidade , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
18.
BMJ ; 363: k5094, 2018 Dec 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30545967

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine if using a parachute prevents death or major traumatic injury when jumping from an aircraft. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Private or commercial aircraft between September 2017 and August 2018. PARTICIPANTS: 92 aircraft passengers aged 18 and over were screened for participation. 23 agreed to be enrolled and were randomized. INTERVENTION: Jumping from an aircraft (airplane or helicopter) with a parachute versus an empty backpack (unblinded). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Composite of death or major traumatic injury (defined by an Injury Severity Score over 15) upon impact with the ground measured immediately after landing. RESULTS: Parachute use did not significantly reduce death or major injury (0% for parachute v 0% for control; P>0.9). This finding was consistent across multiple subgroups. Compared with individuals screened but not enrolled, participants included in the study were on aircraft at significantly lower altitude (mean of 0.6 m for participants v mean of 9146 m for non-participants; P<0.001) and lower velocity (mean of 0 km/h v mean of 800 km/h; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Parachute use did not reduce death or major traumatic injury when jumping from aircraft in the first randomized evaluation of this intervention. However, the trial was only able to enroll participants on small stationary aircraft on the ground, suggesting cautious extrapolation to high altitude jumps. When beliefs regarding the effectiveness of an intervention exist in the community, randomized trials might selectively enroll individuals with a lower perceived likelihood of benefit, thus diminishing the applicability of the results to clinical practice.


Assuntos
Medicina Aeroespacial/métodos , Morte Súbita/prevenção & controle , Equipamentos de Proteção , Ferimentos e Lesões/prevenção & controle , Acidentes Aeronáuticos/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Aeronaves , Feminino , Humanos , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Senso de Humor e Humor como Assunto
20.
Am J Cardiol ; 122(11): 1843-1852, 2018 12 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30309627

RESUMO

The duration and type of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) prescribed to patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) involves carefully balancing reduced ischemia and increased bleeding risk for individual patients. Whereas multiple bleeding risk scores exist, the performance of these models to predict long-term bleeding in the setting of DAPT across different settings and populations is unclear. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the performance of current bleeding risk prediction scores for predicting major long-term bleeding events in patients on DAPT post-PCI. Based on a search of MEDLINE (January 1, 1946 to March 3, 2017) and EMBASE (January 1, 1974 to March 3, 2017) for studies published in the English language, we identified 10 published studies of 11 risk unique risk prediction models across a wide variety of settings. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to measure discrimination, when available. Our findings reveal that the prediction models created to date demonstrate only modest accuracy, with the reported AUCs ranging from 0.54 to 0.89; aggregated AUC 0.68 (95% confidence intervals 0.65 to 0.72). Although only 5 studies (50%) reported measures of calibration, the reported models were reasonably well calibrated. Only 3 models (33%) were externally validated. Meta-regression demonstrated lack of influence by age (p = 0.99) or length of follow up (p = 0.42). Sensitivity analysis did not significantly change the results. Novel prediction models are warranted to aid in maximizing the benefit of DAPT after PCI while minimizing harm.


Assuntos
Isquemia Miocárdica/terapia , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/efeitos adversos , Hemorragia Pós-Operatória/epidemiologia , Medição de Risco , Saúde Global , Humanos , Incidência , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/uso terapêutico , Hemorragia Pós-Operatória/induzido quimicamente , Prognóstico , Fatores de Risco
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...