Quantitative changes in spinal canal dimensions using interbody distraction for spondylolisthesis.

STUDY DESIGN: An experimental study was performed using cadaveric lumbar spines to evaluate the effect of anteriorly or laterally placed interbody distraction implants on the alteration of spinal canal and neuroforaminal dimensions. OBJECTIVES: To quantify changes in the spinal canal and neuroforaminal dimensions using interbody fusion devices inserted at various configurations in cadaveric lumbar spines exhibiting degenerative spondylolisthesis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Although several clinical studies have demonstrated successful treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis with anterior interbody fusion, no study has shown the role of interbody distraction in improving lumbar spinal canal and foraminal stenosis. METHODS: Five fresh cadaver lumbar spines exhibiting a degenerative spondylolisthesis or retrospondylolisthesis were used for the study. Computed tomography scans of each specimen and a silicon mold of the left intervertebral foramens were repeated in a consistent manner after pure compressive load (150 lb) was applied to simulate physiologic load (intact case), after two BAK (Sulzer SpineTech Inc., Minneapolis, MN) distraction plugs were anteriorly inserted into the intervertebral disc space (anterior distraction cases), and after one long BAK cage was laterally inserted from the left side (lateral distraction case). The cross-sectional area of the spinal canal was measured from computed tomography images using National Institutes of Health image software (Bethesda, MD). The spinal canal volume was calculated using the cross-sectional area and total scan thickness. Left intervertebral foraminal volumes were calculated from the weight of the silicon mold injected into the foramen. Descriptive statistics and a Student's t test were used to detect statistical differences in the spinal canal and neuroforaminal volumes before and after interbody distraction. RESULTS: The cross-sectional canal area was significantly increased after anterior distraction (35.11%) and lateral distraction (33.14%). The spinal canal volume was markedly increased with anterior distraction (19.92%) and lateral distraction (21.96%). Left foraminal volume was also enhanced by 40.25% for anterior distraction and 41.03% for lateral distraction. CONCLUSIONS: Interbody distraction either by anteriorly inserted plugs or laterally inserted threaded cagescan immediately improve the narrowed canal area and increase spinal canal, as well as foraminal volume for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis or retro- spondylolisthesis.

Surgical treatment of internal disc disruption: an outcome study of four fusion techniques.

Surgical treatment for internal disc disruption remains controversial in terms of efficacy of spinal fusion and optimal fusion method. The present study was carried out in 56 consecutive patients, with the diagnosis confirmed by computed tomographic (CT) discography, who were operated with one of four different lumbar fusion procedures. Outcomes were determined by postoperative pain questionnaires, independent clinical assessment, and radiographic evaluation. Simultaneous anterior interbody fusion using BAK cage and posterior facet fusion provided the highest rate of fusion (88%) and clinical satisfaction (63%). Pain scores were also significantly lower than facet screw augmented posterolateral fusion, and anterior interbody fusion with fibula allograft, but not significantly different from pedicle screw instrumented posterolateral fusion. Patients who achieved successful lumbar fusion had better clinical outcomes and a better chance of work resumption.