Safety and feasibility of STAT RAD: Improvement of a novel rapid tomotherapy-based radiation therapy workflow by failure mode and effects analysis.

PURPOSE: The clinical challenge of radiation therapy (RT) for painful bone metastases requires clinicians to consider both treatment efficacy and patient prognosis when selecting a radiation therapy regimen. The traditional RT workflow requires several weeks for common palliative RT schedules of 30 Gy in 10 fractions or 20 Gy in 5 fractions. At our institution, we have created a new RT workflow termed "STAT RAD" that allows clinicians to perform computed tomographic (CT) simulation, planning, and highly conformal single fraction treatment delivery within 2 hours. In this study, we evaluate the safety and feasibility of the STAT RAD workflow. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) was performed on the STAT RAD workflow, including development of a process map, identification of potential failure modes, description of the cause and effect, temporal occurrence, and team member involvement in each failure mode, and examination of existing safety controls. A risk probability number (RPN) was calculated for each failure mode. As necessary, workflow adjustments were then made to safeguard failure modes of significant RPN values. After workflow alterations, RPN numbers were again recomputed. RESULTS: A total of 72 potential failure modes were identified in the pre-FMEA STAT RAD workflow, of which 22 met the RPN threshold for clinical significance. Workflow adjustments included the addition of a team member checklist, changing simulation from megavoltage CT to kilovoltage CT, alteration of patient-specific quality assurance testing, and allocating increased time for critical workflow steps. After these modifications, only 1 failure mode maintained RPN significance; patient motion after alignment or during treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Performing the FMEA for the STAT RAD workflow before clinical implementation has significantly strengthened the safety and feasibility of STAT RAD. The FMEA proved a valuable evaluation tool, identifying potential problem areas so that we could create a safer workflow.

Use of megavoltage computed tomography with image registration for high-dose rate treatment planning of an oral tongue cancer using a custom oral mold applicator with embedded lead shielding.

PURPOSE: A patient with a lateral oral tongue cancer was treated with high-dose rate brachytherapy using an oral applicator with embedded lead shielding making conventional simulation, using either kilovoltage computed tomography or radiographs, impossible because of scatter artifact. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Treatment simulation was accomplished using megavoltage computed tomography (MVCT) simulation on a helical tomotherapy unit. Because of difficulty in visualization of the catheters on the patient MVCT images, Velocity AI image registration software (Velocity Medical Solutions, Atlanta, GA) was used to register an MVCT of the applicator itself with the patient MVCT simulation. The treatment plan was manually optimized to prescribe 4Gy/fraction to the gross tumor volume. RESULTS: The patient tolerated the treatment well, with no evidence of disease 6 months after treatment. Thermoluminescent dosimeter measurements showed that the shielding reduced the dose by up to 90%, depending on the location of the thermoluminescent dosimeter. While the patient was treated using dose distributions calculated in a homogeneous medium (Task Group-43), an approximation of the true dose distributions was retrospectively calculated using Acuros (Varian Medical Systems Inc., Palo Alto, CA), which accounts for heterogeneities in the patient. DISCUSSION: Use of the MVCT with image registration allowed treatment planning in the presence of lead shielding. Dose-volume histograms showed that recalculation of the dose using heterogeneity correction did not affect the dose to the gross tumor volume, but that the dose to normal structures (maxilla and mandible) was reduced by the lead shielding. CONCLUSION: The use of MVCT and image registration allows for optimized planning in the presence of shielding, which would not be possible with conventional kilovoltage computed tomography.

The implication of non-cyclic intrafractional longitudinal motion in SBRT by TomoTherapy.

To determine the dosimetric impact of non-cyclic longitudinal intrafractional motion, TomoTherapy plans with different field sizes were interrupted during a phantom delivery, and a displacement between -5 mm and 5 mm was induced prior to the delivery of the completion procedure. The planar dose was measured by film and a cylindrical phantom, and under-dosed or over-dosed volume was observed for either positive or negative displacement. For a 2.5 cm field, there was a 4% deviation for every mm of motion and for a 1 cm field, the deviation was 8% per mm. The dimension of the under/over-dosed area was independent of the motion but dependent on the field size. The results have significant implication in small-field high-dose treatments (i.e. stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT)) that deliver doses in only a few fractions. Our studies demonstrate that a small longitudinal motion may cause a dose error that is difficult to compensate; however, dividing a SBRT fraction into smaller passes is helpful to reduce such adverse effects.