Performance of automated measurement of antibodies to cyclic citrullinated peptide in the routine clinical laboratory.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performing technical and clinical characteristics of an automated system for routine measurement of anticyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies (aCCP), a new marker for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Reproducibility, repeatability and linearity of aCCP, as measured by an automated fluorescent enzyme immunoassay (FEIA/Phadia), were evaluated and compared with the performance of a manual ELISA technique (Axis Shield Diagnostics). Clinical verification of both methods included estimation of sensitivity in RA patients (n = 42) and specificity in well-characterized non-RA autoimmune disease controls (n = 49) and healthy subjects (n = 39). RESULTS: Precision studies showed a coefficient of variation between 4.9 % and 10 % for the FEIA technique and between 6.35% and 19% for the ELISA technique. Both systems showed good linear response. Sensitivity of aCCP for RA was 74% for FEIA and 79% for ELISA. Specificity was 100% for both methods, as calculated for healthy subjects. For non-RA-diseased controls, specificities of 98% and 94% were obtained for FEIA and ELISA, respectively. Both methods were concordant in 97% of cases. Increasing the cut-off for the ELISA system from >5 U/mL to >11 U/mL resulted in lower sensitivity (71.4%) but higher specificity (98.0%), i.e. improved discriminating power between RA and non-RA and 100% agreement between both methods. CONCLUSION: Automated FEIA measurement of aCCP in the routine clinical laboratory improves imprecision compared to the manual ELISA. Our preliminary results suggest that an increase in cut-off for the ELISA can improve specificity to RA from 94% to 98 %.

Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies in inflammatory bowel disease with special attention for IgA-class antibodies.

Perinuclear anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (P-ANCA) of the IgG class have been reported in inflammatory bowel disease, mainly in ulcerative colitis. Since this disease affects the gastrointestinal tract, we determined whether IgA class ANCA were present in inflammatory bowel disease. We used an indirect immunofluorescence assay for IgG and IgA ANCA testing. Sera from 34 patients with Crohn's disease and 29 patients with ulcerative colitis were collected together with clinical and laboratory data. We found IgA class ANCA of a perinuclear type in 52% of patients with ulcerative colitis and in 9% of Crohn's disease patients. There was a significant association between the presence of IgA ANCA and the occurrence of blood in the feces in the ulcerative colitis group (P = 0.03). IgG ANCA was found in 56% of patients with ulcerative colitis and in 7% of patients with Crohn's disease. Because of partial overlap between IgG and IgA ANCA positivity, the sensitivity of ANCA testing in ulcerative colitis increased from 56% up to 78% by combining IgG and IgA assays. In conclusion, IgA ANCA occurs with a high prevalence in ulcerative colitis. Moreover there is a possible relationship between IgA ANCA and disease activity in ulcerative colitis.

Anticardiolipin, anti-beta(2)-glycoprotein I, antiprothrombin antibodies, and lupus anticoagulant in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus with a history of thrombosis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the clinical importance of anticardiolipin (aCL), anti-beta(2)-glycoprotein I (a beta(2)-GPI), antiprothrombin (aPT), and lupus anticoagulant (LAC) antibodies in patients with systemic lupus erythematosis (SLE) with and without a history of thrombosis. METHODS: We studied 100 patients with SLE (32 with a history of thrombosis), 27 patients with a lupus-like disease (9 with a history of thrombosis), and 41 healthy volunteers, IgG and IgM aCL, antibodies to the protein cofactors (a beta(2)-GPI and aPT) were determined by ELISA. Eighty-six of 127 patients were also tested for LAC. RESULTS: IgG aCL and LAC were associated with thrombosis but sensitivity (63 and 61%) and specificity (66 and 66%, respectively) of these tests were low. IgG and IgM a beta(2)-GPI were, respectively, 85 and 86% specific for a thrombotic history, but sensitivity was very low (32 and 29%). High IgG aCL were associated with the presence of a beta(2)-GPI and were 85% specific for thrombosis. There was no significant association between IgG or IgM aPT and thrombosis. CONCLUSION: Only high levels of IgG aCL and presence of LAC and/or a beta(2)-GPI are relevant in defining a thrombotic subset of patients with SLE. Longitudinal prospective studies are needed to investigate the predictive value of the different antiphospholipid and protein cofactor antibodies.