Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
Int Urogynecol J ; 23(4): 487-93, 2012 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22143448

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: This study was designed to evaluate clinical outcomes ≥2 years following surgery with polypropylene mesh and vaginal support device (VSD) in women with vaginal prolapse, in a prospective, multi-center setting. METHODS: Patients re-consented for this extended follow-up (n = 110), with anatomic evaluation using Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) and validated questionnaires to assess pelvic symptoms and sexual function. Complications were recorded (safety set; n = 121). RESULTS: Median length of follow-up was 29 months (range 24-34 months). The primary anatomic success, defined as POP-Q 0-I, was 69.1%; however, in 84.5% of the cases, the leading vaginal edge was above the hymen. Pelvic symptoms and sexual function improved significantly from baseline (p < 0.01). Mesh exposure rate was 9.1%. Five percent reported stress urinary incontinence and 3.3% required further prolapse surgery. CONCLUSION: These results indicate this non-anchored mesh repair is a safe and effective treatment for women with symptomatic vaginal prolapse in the medium term.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/métodos , Slings Suburetrais , Telas Cirúrgicas , Prolapso Uterino/cirurgia , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Seguimentos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/instrumentação , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Polipropilenos , Slings Suburetrais/efeitos adversos , Telas Cirúrgicas/efeitos adversos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...