Dynamics of Cutibacterium repopulation onto the skin surface of the shoulder after chlorhexidine application.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to characterize the temporal dynamics of Cutibacterium repopulation of the skin surface after application of chlorhexidine to the shoulder. METHODS: Ten shoulders in five male subjects were used. A skin swab was taken prior to (0 minutes) and then at three, 30, 60, 120, and 240 minutes after skin preparation with 2% chlorhexidine gluconate and 70% isopropyl alcohol. Semi-quantitative bacterial load was measured for each timepoint. RESULTS: From zero minutes (pre-treatment) to three minutes, chlorhexidine-isopropyl alcohol reduced the skin bacterial load in eight out of ten shoulders. Of these eight shoulders, four (50%) had growth by 30 minutes, seven (88%) had growth by 60 minutes, and all eight (100%) had growth by 240 minutes. Compared to the three minutes after chlorhexidine application, bacterial load had significantly increased by 60 minutes but were still significantly lower than the pre-prep bacterial load (0 minutes). CONCLUSION: Following standard surgical skin preparation with chlorhexidine-isopropyl alcohol, the surface of the shoulder is repopulated with Cutibacterium within one hour, presumably from reservoirs in sebaceous glands not penetrated by topical antiseptic agents. Since these dermal glands are transected by skin incision for shoulder arthroplasty, this study suggests that they may be sources of wound contamination during surgery in spite of skin preparation with chlorhexidine.

Biomechanical Head-to-Head Comparison of 2 Sutures and the Giftbox Versus Bunnell Techniques for Midsubstance Achilles Tendon Ruptures.

BACKGROUND: Acute midsubstance Achilles tendon ruptures are a common orthopaedic problem for which the optimal repair technique and suture type remain controversial. Head-to-head comparisons of current fixation constructs are needed to establish which stitch/suture combination is most biomechanically favorable. HYPOTHESIS: Of the tested fixation constructs, Giftbox repairs with Fiberwire will exhibit superior stiffness and strength during biomechanical testing. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Two biomechanical trials were performed, isolating stitch technique and suture type, respectively. In trial 1, 12 transected fresh-frozen cadaveric Achilles tendon pairs were randomized to receive either the Giftbox-modified Krackow or the Bunnell stitch with No. 2 Fiberwire suture. Each repair underwent cyclic loading, oscillating between 10 and 100 N at 2 Hz for 1000 cycles, with repair gapping measured at 500 and 1000 cycles. Load-to-failure testing was then performed, and clinical and catastrophic failure values were recorded. In trial 2, 10 additional paired cadaveric Achilles tendons were randomized to receive a Giftbox repair with either No. 2 Fiberwire or No. 2 Ultrabraid. Testing and data collections protocols in trial 2 replicated those used in trial 1. RESULTS: In trial 1, the Bunnell group had 2 failures during cyclic loading while the Giftbox had no failures. The mean tendon gapping after cyclic loading was significantly lower in the Giftbox repairs (0.13 vs 2.29 mm, P = .02). Giftbox repairs were significantly stiffer than Bunnell (47.5 vs 38.7 N/mm, P = .019) and showed more tendon elongation (5.9 ± 0.8 vs 4.5 ± 1.0 mm, P = .012) after 1000 cycles. Mean clinical load to failure was significantly higher for Giftbox repairs (373 vs 285 N, P = .02), while no significant difference in catastrophic load to failure was observed (mean, 379 vs 336 N; P = .61). In trial 2, there were no failures during cyclic loading. The Giftbox + Fiberwire repairs recorded higher clinical load-to-failure values compared with Giftbox + Ultrabraid (mean, 361 vs 239 N; P = .005). No other biomechanical differences were observed in trial 2. CONCLUSION: Simulated early rehabilitation biomechanical testing showed that Giftbox-modified Krackow Achilles repair technique with Fiberwire suture was stronger and more resistant to gap formation at the repair site than combinations that incorporated the Bunnell stitch or Ultrabraid suture. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: A more in-depth understanding of the biomechanical properties of the Giftbox repair will help inform surgical decision making because stronger repairs are less likely to fail during accelerated postoperative rehabilitation.

A Comparative Biomechanical Analysis of 2 Double-Row, Distal Triceps Tendon Repairs.

BACKGROUND: Triceps tendon ruptures are rare orthopaedic injuries that almost always require surgical repair. This study tests the biomechanical properties of an original anchorless double-row triceps repair against a previously reported knotless double-row repair. HYPOTHESIS: The anchorless double-row triceps repair technique will yield similar biomechanical properties when compared with the knotless double-row repair technique. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Eighteen cadaver arms were randomized into 2 groups. One group received the anchorless repair and the other received the knotless anchor repair. A materials testing system (MTS) machine was used to cycle the repaired arms from 0° to 90° with a 2.5-pound weight for 1500 cycles at 0.25 Hz. Real-time displacement of the tendon was measured during cycling using a probe. Load to failure was performed after completion of cyclic loading. RESULTS: The mean displacement with the anchorless technique was 0.77 mm (SD, 0.25 mm) at 0° (full elbow extension) and 0.76 mm (SD, 0.38 mm) at 90° (elbow flexion). The mean displacement with the anchored technique was 0.83 mm (SD, 0.57 mm) at 0° and 1.01 mm (SD, 0.62 mm) at 90°. There was no statistically significant difference for tendon displacement at 0º (P = .75) or 90º (P = .31). The mean load to failure with the anchorless technique was 618.9 N (SD, 185.6 N), while it was 560.5 N (SD, 154.1 N) with the anchored technique, again with no statistically significant difference (P = .28). CONCLUSION: Our anchorless double-row triceps repair technique yields comparable biomechanical properties to previously described double-row triceps tendon repair techniques, with the added benefit of avoiding the cost of suture anchors. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This anchorless double-row triceps tendon repair can be considered as an acceptable alternative to a knotless anchor repair for triceps tendon ruptures.