Mortality and guideline-directed medical therapy in real-world heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) in commercially insured US patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and examine the effect of GDMT on all-cause mortality. GDMT for HFrEF includes pharmacologic therapies such as ß-blockers (BB), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB), angiotensin receptor-neprilysin (ARNI), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA), and sodium-glucose cotransporter inhibitors to reduce morbidity and mortality. METHODS: Patients in the Optum Integrated File from 2007 to 2019Q3, ≥18 years, with history of HFrEF, were identified. Patients prescribed both a BB and either an ACE-I, ARB, or ARNI during 6-month post-diagnosis were assigned to the GDMT cohort. All others were assigned to the not on GDMT cohort. The GDMT cohort was further classified by those patients with a record of prescription fills for both classes of medications concurrently (GDMT concurrent medication fills). Mortality at 2 years was assessed with a Cox regression model accounting for baseline demographics, comorbidities, and diuretic use. RESULTS: This study identified 14 880 HFrEF patients, of which 70% had a record of GDMT, and 57% had a record of concurrent prescriptions. Patients in the not on GDMT cohort had 29% increased risk of mortality versus GDMT (hazard ratio 1.29; 95% CI (1.19-1.40); p < .0001). As a sensitivity analysis, the effect of patients not on GDMT compared to GDMT with concurrent medication fills was more pronounced, with a 37% increased mortality risk. CONCLUSION: In a real-world population of HFrEF patients, inadequate GDMT confers a 29% excess mortality risk over the 2-year follow-up.

Relation of Institutional Mitral Valve Surgical Volume to Surgical and Transcatheter Outcomes in Medicare Patients.

There are limited data to support proposed increases to the minimum institutional mitral valve (MV) surgery volume required to begin a transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVr) program. The current study examined the association between institutional MV procedure volumes and outcomes. All 2017 Medicare fee-for-service patients who received a TMVr or MV surgery procedure were included and analyzed separately. The exposure was institutional MV surgery volume: low (1 to 24), medium (25 to 39) or high (40+). Outcomes were in-hospital mortality and 1-year postdischarge mortality and cardiovascular rehospitalization. For MV surgery patients, in-hospital mortality rates were 6.4% at low-volume, 8.7% at medium-volume and 9.8% at high-volume facilities. Rates were significantly higher for low-volume [OR = 1.50, 95% CI (1.23 to 1.84)] and medium-volume [OR = 1.33, 95% CI (1.06 to 1.67)] compared with high-volume facilities. There was no statistically significant relationship between institutional MV surgery volume and in-hospital mortality for TMVr patients, either at low-volume [OR = 1.52, 95% CI (0.56, 4.13)] or medium-volume [OR = 1.58, 95% CI (0.82, 3.02)] facilities, compared with high-volume facilities. Across all volume categories, in-hospital mortality rates for TMVr patients were relatively low (2.3% on average). For both cohorts, the rates of 1-year mortality and cardiovascular rehospitalizations were not significantly higher at low- or medium-volume MV surgery facilities, as compared with high-volume. In conclusion, among Medicare patients, there was a relation between institutional MV surgery volume and in-hospital mortality for MV surgery patients, but not for TMVr patients.

Comparison of Survival in Patients With Clinically Significant Tricuspid Regurgitation With and Without Heart Failure (From the Optum Integrated File).

This study aimed to quantify survival rates for patients with tricuspid regurgitation (TR) using real-world data. Several clinical conditions are associated with TR, including heart failure (HF), other valve disease (OVD), right-sided heart disease (RSHD), and others that impact mortality. Optum data from January 1, 2007, through December 31, 2018 included patients age ≥18 years with TR and 12 months of continuous health plan enrollment before TR. Exclusion criteria were end-stage renal disease or known/primary organ pathology. Cohorts were created hierarchically: (1) TR with HF; (2) TR with OVD (no HF); (3) TR with RSHD only (no OVD or HF); (4) TR only. Survival was estimated using a Cox hazard model with an interaction term for TR severity and adjusted for patient demographics and Elixhauser co-morbidities. A total of 33,686 met study inclusion (1) TR with HF (26.6%); (2) TR with OVD (36.7%); (3) TR with RSHD only (17.1%); (4) TR only (19.6%). TR patients (regardless of severity) with HF, OVD or RSHD had an increased risk of mortality compared with patients with TR alone. TR severity was also significantly associated (hazard ratio = 1.33; p = 0.0002) with an increased risk of all-cause mortality. In conclusion, TR severity is significantly associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality, independent of associated conditions including HF, OVD, or RSHD. In patients with severe TR, the mortality risk is most pronounced for patients who had RSHD without HF or OVD before their TR diagnosis.

Impact of mitral regurgitation on cardiovascular hospitalization and death in newly diagnosed heart failure patients.

AIMS: Heart failure (HF) carries a poor prognosis, and the impact of concomitant mitral regurgitation (MR) is not well understood. This analysis aimed to estimate the incremental effect of MR in patients newly diagnosed with HF. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data from the IBM® MarketScan® Research Databases were analysed. Included patients had at least one inpatient or two outpatient HF claims. A 6 month post-period after HF index was used to capture MR diagnosis and severity. HF patients were separated into three cohorts: without MR (no MR), not clinically significant MR (nsMR), and significant MR (sMR). Time-to-event analyses were modelled to estimate the clinical burden of disease. The primary outcome was a composite endpoint of death or cardiovascular (CV)-related admission. Secondary outcomes were death and CV hospitalization alone. All models controlled for baseline demographics and co-morbidities. Patients with sMR were at significantly higher risk of either death or CV admission compared with patients with no MR [hazard ratio (HR) 1.26; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.15-1.39]. When evaluating death alone, patients with sMR had significantly higher risk of death (HR 1.24; 95% CI 1.08-1.43) compared with patients with no MR. When evaluating CV admission alone, patients with MR were at higher risk of hospital admission vs. patients with no MR, and the magnitude was dependent upon the MR severity: sMR (HR 1.55; 95% CI 1.38-1.74) and nsMR (HR 1.23; 95% CI 1.08-1.40). CONCLUSIONS: Evidence of MR in retrospective claims significantly increases the clinical burden of incident HF patients. Time to death and CV hospitalizations are increased when MR is clinically significant.

The economic impact of clinically significant tricuspid regurgitation in a large, administrative claims database.

Aim: This study aimed to quantify the healthcare burden of clinically significant tricuspid regurgitation (TR) in patients with and without heart failure (HF).Materials and Methods: Data were from the IBM MarketScan Research Databases from October 2011 to September 2016. Eligible patients met the following inclusion criteria: age ≥18 with a TR diagnosis, 12 months pre (baseline), and 6 months post (landmark) medical enrollment. The landmark period was used to categorize TR severity, defined as a record of pulmonary hypertension with ascites, lower extremity edema or hepatic insufficiency, or tricuspid valve surgery. Cohorts were defined based on TR etiology and severity: (1) no HF and no clinically significant TR; (2) HF with no clinically significant TR; (3) no HF with clinically significant TR; and (4) HF with clinically significant TR. Outcomes of interest were all-cause hospitalizations, hospital days, and expenditures. Multivariable models were fit for each of the annualized outcomes and adjusted for patient demographics, comorbidities, and other concomitant valve diseases.Results: There were 92,994 patients eligible for analysis. Patients with no HF and no clinically significant TR had the annualized healthcare burden of 0.20 all-cause hospitalizations (approximately one inpatient hospitalization every 5 years), 1.07 hospital days, and $17,478 in expenditures. The presence of clinically significant TR, alone or with HF, significantly increased healthcare utilization and expenditures. For patients with no HF with clinically significant TR, the annualized economic burden increased to 0.41 all-cause hospitalizations, 3.13 hospital days, and $29,985 in expenditures. For patients with HF and clinically significant TR, the annualized economic burden was even greater with 0.59 all-cause hospitalizations, 4.31 hospital days, and $42,255 in expenditures.Conclusion: The presence of clinically significant TR is associated with an increase in healthcare utilization and expenditures, irrespective of the presence of HF.

The Economic Impact of Mitral Regurgitation on Patients With Medically Managed Heart Failure.

The objective of this study was to quantify the financial healthcare burden of mitral regurgitation (MR) on medically managed heart failure (HF) patients. Data from the Truven Health MarketScan Commercial Claims and Medicare Supplemental Databases were analyzed. Included patients had a minimum of 1 inpatient or 2 outpatient claims for HF with a 6-month preperiod (baseline). A 6-month postperiod (landmark) after HF index was used to capture MR diagnosis and severity. Following the landmark period, patients had to have 12 months of continuous medical and prescription drug plan enrollment with at least 2 records of HF medication refills. A therapeutic intensity score was calculated based on HF medication usage. Medically managed HF patients were separated into 3 cohorts: without MR (no MR), insignificant MR (iMR), and significant MR (sMR). Healthcare utilization and all-cause expenditures were modeled to quantify the burden of MR. All models controlled for baseline demographics, co-morbid conditions, and HF therapeutic intensity. Medically managed incident HF patients with sMR had significantly more hospital days (1.91 vs 1.72 days; p = 0.0096) and annual expenditures ($23,988 vs $21,530; p < 0.0001) compared with no MR patients. No differences were identified when comparing iMR and no MR. When evaluating HF admissions, sMR patients had an estimated 50% greater HF admissions rate (0.036 vs 0.024; p < 0.0001) compared with no MR patients. Additionally, HF admits for iMR were 23% more than those with no MR (0.029 vs 0.024; p = 0.0064). In conclusion, evidence of MR in retrospective claims significantly increases the healthcare impact of medically managed HF patients. Both utilization and financial burden is more pronounced when MR is clinically significant.

The healthcare burden of disease progression in medicare patients with functional mitral regurgitation.

Objective: This retrospective database analysis estimated the incremental effect that disease progression from non-clinically significant functional mitral regurgitation (nsFMR) to clinically significant FMR (sFMR) has on clinical outcomes and costs. Methods: Medicare Fee for Service beneficiaries with nsFMR were examined, defined as those with a heart failure diagnosis prior to MR. Patients were classified as ischemic if there was a history of: CAD, AMI, PCI, or CABG. The primary outcome was time to sFMR, defined as pulmonary hypertension, atrial fibrillation, mitral valve surgery, serial echocardiography, or death, using a Cox hazard regression model. Annualized hospitalizations, inpatient hospital days, and healthcare expenditures were also modeled. Results: Patients with IHD had higher risk (Hazard Ratio = 1.22 [1.14-1.30]) for disease progression compared to patients without. The progression cohort had significantly more annual inpatient hospitalizations (non-IHD = 1.32; IHD = 1.40) than the non-progression cohort (non-IHD = 0.36; IHD = 0.34), and significantly more annual inpatient hospital days (non-IHD = 13.07; IHD = 13.52) than the non-progression cohort (non-IHD = 2.29; with IHD = 2.08). The progression cohort had over 3.5-times higher costs vs the non-progression cohort, independent of IHD (non-IHD = $12,798 vs $46,784; IHD = $12,582 vs $49,348). Conclusion: Treating FMR patients earlier in their clinical trajectory may prevent disease progression and reduce high rates of healthcare utilization and expenditures.