Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Int J Lab Hematol ; 38(6): 674-684, 2016 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27460189

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Standardization of BCR-ABL1 messenger RNA quantification by real-time PCR on the International Scale (IS) is critical for monitoring therapy response in chronic myelogenous leukaemia. Since 2006, BCR-ABL1 IS standardization is propagated along reference laboratories by calculating a laboratory-specific conversion factor (CF), co-ordinated in Europe through the European Treatment and Outcome Study project. Although this process has proven successful to some extent, it has not been achievable for all laboratories due to the complexity of the process and the stringent requirements in terms of numbers of samples to be exchanged. In addition, several BCR-ABL1 IS quantification methods and secondary reference materials became commercially available. However, it was observed that different IS methods generate consistently different results. METHODS: To overcome these difficulties, we have developed an alternative and simple approach of CF calculation, based on the retrospective analysis of existing external quality assessment (EQA) data. Our approach does not depend on the exchange of samples and is solely based on the mathematical CF calculation using EQA results. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: We have demonstrated by thorough statistical validation that this approach performs well in converting BCR-ABL1 measurements to improve IS estimation. In expectation of a true golden standard method for BCR-ABL1 IS quantification, the proposed method is a valuable alternative.


Assuntos
Proteínas de Fusão bcr-abl/genética , Leucemia Mielogênica Crônica BCR-ABL Positiva/diagnóstico , RNA Mensageiro/análise , Testes Genéticos , Cooperação Internacional , Leucemia Mielogênica Crônica BCR-ABL Positiva/genética , Métodos , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Padrões de Referência , Estudos Retrospectivos
2.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ; 85(2): 255-9, 2016 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27107537

RESUMO

We have introduced a real-time PCR for the simultaneous detection of Campylobacter jejuni, Salmonella spp., Shigella spp./enteroinvasive Escherichia coli and Yersinia enterocolitica in fecal samples in our routine laboratory. This new approach showed consistent results, with minimal inter-sample variation. When compared to conventional culture, the hands-on time decreased by 13 h/wk, and the median turnaround time drastically shortened from 73 to 29 h (P < .0001). Moreover, the detection rate of the targeted pathogens seemed to increase: the positivity rate registered over a twelve month period increased from 4.98% when using bacterial culture, compared to 8.56% when using real-time PCR (P < .0001). For antimicrobial susceptibility testing, samples that are found to be PCR positive are additionally cultured after the PCR result is known. Using this algorithm, we got a positive culture for 71.0% of the PCR positive samples. The samples missed by guided culture had significantly higher quantification cycle (Cq) values compared to the samples picked up by guided culture (P = .0003). Finally; we also tested the effect of extended sample storage on the performance of guided culture. Storage time prior to inoculation did have an effect on the positivity rate of culture; interestingly, these effects were clearly species-dependent.


Assuntos
Bactérias/isolamento & purificação , Infecções Bacterianas/diagnóstico , Técnicas Bacteriológicas/métodos , Fezes/microbiologia , Gastroenterite/diagnóstico , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase em Tempo Real/métodos , Algoritmos , Bactérias/genética , Bactérias/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Seguimentos , Humanos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Fatores de Tempo
3.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis ; 34(3): 535-42, 2015 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25326870

RESUMO

Conventional diagnosis of infectious diarrhea caused by bacteria is time-consuming, labor-intensive, and has a suboptimal sensitivity. We have therefore developed a multiplex real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for the simultaneous detection of Campylobacter jejuni, Salmonella spp., Shigella spp./enteroinvasive Escherichia coli (EIEC), and Yersinia enterocolitica in fecal samples. No cross reactivity between the different pathogens was observed, and the multiplex setup of the assay did not have an impact on the sensitivity of the PCR. The analytical sensitivity was 87 CFU/mL for C. jejuni, 61 CFU/mL for Shigella spp./EIEC, 5,528 CFU/mL for Salmonella spp., and 1,306 CFU/mL for Y. enterocolitica. An extensive validation of the assay was performed by testing 1,687 patient samples by both PCR and with conventional techniques. The use of PCR increased the overall clinical sensitivity from 78 to 100 % (p < 0.0001), the specificity was 99.4 % for the PCR, compared with 99.9 % for conventional culture. The novel PCR assay allows for rapid, sensitive, inexpensive, and high-throughput testing of the most common bacterial causes of gastroenteritis.


Assuntos
Infecções por Campylobacter/diagnóstico , Campylobacter jejuni/isolamento & purificação , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/diagnóstico , Enterobacteriaceae/isolamento & purificação , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular/métodos , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase Multiplex/métodos , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase em Tempo Real/métodos , Fezes/microbiologia , Humanos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
4.
Acta Clin Belg ; 68(3): 188-92, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24156218

RESUMO

Diagnosis of intestinal parasites in stool samples is generally still carried out by microscopy; however, this technique is known to suffer from a low sensitivity and is unable to discriminate between certain protozoa. In order to overcome these limitations, a real-time multiplex PCR was evaluated as an alternative approach for diagnosing Giardia lamblia, Cryptosporidium spp. and Entamoeba histolytica in stool samples.Therefore, a total of 631 faecal samples were analysed both by microscopy as well as by real-time PCR following automated DNA extraction. Results showed that real-time PCR exhibited sensitivity and specificity of both 100%, whereas traditional microscopy exhibited sensitivity and specificity of 37.5% and 99.8% respectively. As real-time PCR provides simple, sensitive and specific detection of these three important pathogenic protozoan parasites, this technique, rather than microscopy, has become our diagnostic method of choice for the detection of enteric protozoan parasites for the majority of patients.


Assuntos
Cryptosporidium/isolamento & purificação , DNA de Protozoário/análise , Entamoeba histolytica/isolamento & purificação , Fezes/parasitologia , Giardia lamblia/isolamento & purificação , Enteropatias Parasitárias/diagnóstico , Criptosporidiose/diagnóstico , Cryptosporidium/genética , DNA de Protozoário/genética , Entamoeba histolytica/genética , Entamebíase/diagnóstico , Feminino , Giardia lamblia/genética , Giardíase/diagnóstico , Humanos , Masculino , Microscopia , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase em Tempo Real , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...