Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg ; 48(3): 1993-2001, 2022 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33712893

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The management of complicated ventral hernias (CVH), namely ventral hernias in actively or recently infected/contaminated operative fields, and open abdomens in which the native fascia cannot be primarily reapproximated, pose a surgical challenge. Fetal Bovine and Porcine Acellular Dermal Matrix (BADM and PADM) biologic meshes are being increasingly used in these scenarios. A comparison, however, of clinically relevant outcomes between the two is lacking. With this investigation, we aim to review and compare clinically relevant outcomes in patients that underwent abdominal wall herniorrhaphy with either BADM or PADM at a tertiary urban academic institution over a 5-year period. METHODS: Patients who had a BADM or PADM implanted during CVH over a 5-year period at a tertiary urban academic hospital were identified. Baseline clinical and hernia characteristics, as well as postoperative outcomes were compared after a retrospective chart review. Phone interviews were also conducted to assess for recurrence, followed by in-person visits as indicated. Cox Proportional Hazard regression was fitted to identify risk factors for recurrence. RESULTS: Of the 140 patients who underwent biologic mesh implantation for CVH, 109 were for ventral hernia repair and 31 for open abdomen bridging. Mean age was 52.7 ± 14.2 and males constituted 57.9% of our sample, while 25.1% had undergone > 5 prior abdominal operations. Thirty percent were active smokers, and another 30% required emergency surgery. Only immunosuppression was a risk factor for recurrence [HR 13.3 (1.04-169.2), p = 0.047] on Cox Proportional Hazard regression, while mesh selection had no effect. CONCLUSIONS: Both BADM and PADM meshes perform well in CVH, with satisfactory recurrence rates, only slightly higher compared to traditional synthetic mesh repairs.


Assuntos
Parede Abdominal , Derme Acelular , Produtos Biológicos , Hérnia Ventral , Parede Abdominal/cirurgia , Animais , Bovinos , Hérnia Ventral/etiologia , Hérnia Ventral/cirurgia , Herniorrafia/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Recidiva , Estudos Retrospectivos , Telas Cirúrgicas , Suínos , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
World J Surg ; 43(3): 937-943, 2019 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30478680

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Routine preoperative staging in pancreas cancer is controversial. We sought to evaluate the rates of diagnostic laparoscopy (DLAP) for pancreatic cancer. METHODS: We queried the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program for patients with pancreas cancer (2005-2013) and compared groups who underwent DLAP, exploratory laparotomy (XLAP), pancreas resection (RSXN) or therapeutic bypass (THBP). We compared demographics, comorbidities, postoperative complications, 30-day mortality (Chi-square P < 0.05) and trends over time (R2 0-1). RESULTS: We identified 17,138 patients (RSXN 81.8%, XLAP 16.5%, THBP 8.2%, and DLAP 12.9%), with some having multiple CPT codes. Only 10.3% (n = 1432) of RSXN patients underwent DLAP prior to resection. XLAP occurred in 49.5% of non-RSXN patients, of whom 67.1% had no other operation. The percentage of patients undergoing RSXN increased 20.3% over time (R2 0.81), while DLAP decreased 52.6% (R2 0.92). XLAP patients without other operations decreased from 4.2 to 2.4%, although not linearly (R2 0.31). Only 10.3% of XLAP had a diagnostic laparoscopy as well, leaving nearly 90% of these patients with an exploratory laparotomy without RSXN or THBP. DISCUSSION: Diagnostic laparoscopy for pancreas malignancy is becoming less common but could benefit a subset of patients who undergo open exploration without resection or therapeutic bypass.


Assuntos
Laparoscopia/tendências , Pancreatectomia/tendências , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirurgia , Melhoria de Qualidade , Idoso , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Humanos , Laparoscopia/estatística & dados numéricos , Laparotomia/tendências , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias/métodos , Estadiamento de Neoplasias/tendências , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/cirurgia
3.
J Vasc Surg ; 68(4): 1023-1029.e2, 2018 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29602472

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Percutaneous endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) can be performed with general anesthesia (GA) or local anesthesia (LA). Our goal was to assess perioperative outcomes comparing anesthesia type in percutaneous EVAR. METHODS: The Vascular Quality Initiative database was queried for all exclusively percutaneous EVAR procedures. Univariable analysis was used to compare which patients were offered LA. Multivariable analysis was used to determine the independent effect of anesthesia type. RESULTS: There were 8141 percutaneous EVARs identified in the Vascular Quality Initiative database. Average age was 73 years, and 83% were male. GA and LA were used in 7387 (90.7%) and 754 (9.3%) cases, respectively. GA was used more often in patients who were younger (72.8 ± 8 vs 74.3 ± 9), white (89% vs 84.5%), and on Medicare (62% vs 61.5%); in patients with higher body mass index (28.3 ± 6 vs 27.3 ± 7), hypertension (81.5% vs 77.8%), diabetes (20.5% vs 17.4%), and previous lower extremity bypass (1.7% vs 0.5%); and in patients undergoing elective repair (86.4% vs 81.3%). Use of GA was associated with lower rates of preoperative congestive heart failure (11.6% vs 16.1%), preoperative anticoagulation (11.7% vs 14.2%), and less use of ultrasound guidance (81.5% vs 88.8%; P < .05). There was no difference in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, coronary artery disease, previous aneurysm repair, and concomitant iliac aneurysm repair. Multivariable analysis showed that GA compared with LA was associated with more pulmonary complications (odds ratio, 2.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.49-5.43; P = .002) and prolonged operative time (means ratio, 1.11; 95% confidence interval, 1.08-1.52; P < .001). There was no independent effect on overall complications, cardiac complications, or mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Although it was used in only 1 in 10 cases of percutaneous EVAR, LA was associated with fewer pulmonary complications after adjustment for patient factors. Surgeons should consider expanding the use of LA for percutaneous EVAR when feasible.


Assuntos
Anestesia Geral , Anestesia Local , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/cirurgia , Implante de Prótese Vascular/métodos , Procedimentos Endovasculares/métodos , Doenças Respiratórias/etiologia , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anestesia Geral/efeitos adversos , Anestesia Geral/mortalidade , Anestesia Local/efeitos adversos , Anestesia Local/mortalidade , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/mortalidade , Implante de Prótese Vascular/efeitos adversos , Implante de Prótese Vascular/mortalidade , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Comorbidade , Bases de Dados Factuais , Procedimentos Endovasculares/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Endovasculares/mortalidade , Feminino , Nível de Saúde , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Razão de Chances , Pontuação de Propensão , Doenças Respiratórias/mortalidade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
Front Surg ; 4: 14, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28349051

RESUMO

This article provides a theoretical and practical rational for the implementation of an innovative and comprehensive social wellness program in a surgical residency program at a large safety net hospital on the East Coast of the United States. Using basic needs theory, we describe why it is particularly important for surgical residency programs to consider the residents sense of competence, autonomy, and belonging during residence. We describe how we have developed a comprehensive program to address our residents' (and residents' families) psychological needs for competence, autonomy, and belongingness.

5.
J Vasc Surg ; 65(4): 1039-1046, 2017 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28041804

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Endovascular interventions of the common (CFA) and deep (DFA) femoral arteries are becoming more common. However, there is very little published data for guidance. Our objective was to analyze practice patterns and outcomes from these interventions. METHODS: The Vascular Quality Initiative (2010-2015) was queried for all endovascular interventions of the CFA and DFA. Cases that were emergent or for acute limb ischemia were excluded. Those with isolated CFA with or without DFA treatment were analyzed. RESULTS: There were 1014 patients that had either an isolated CFA intervention (946) with or without a DFA intervention (68). Average age of this isolated cohort was 67.4 ± 10.8 years, and 59% were male. Indications were claudication (67%), rest pain (16.3%), and tissue loss (16.7%). Periprocedural complications were access site hematoma (5.2%), arterial dissection (2.9%), distal embolization (0.7%), access site stenosis/occlusion (0.5%), and arterial perforation (0.6%). Thirty-day mortality was 1.6%. Survival was 92.9% at 1 year and 87.2% at 3 years. Amputation-free survival, freedom from loss of patency or death, and reintervention-free survival were 93.5%, 83%, and 87.5% at 1 year, respectively, by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Multivariable predictors of mortality were tissue loss, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), end-stage renal disease, urgent case, and age, whereas aspirin use and non-Caucasian race were protective. Tissue loss, rest pain, COPD, end-stage renal disease, stent use, nonambulatory status, and female sex were predictive of major amputation whereas aspirin use, P2Y12 antagonist use, statin use, and initial technical success were protective. Tissue loss, case urgency and nonambulatory status predicted patency loss or death. Tissue loss, COPD, stent use, and history of prior bypass predicted reintervention. CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular interventions of the CFA/DFA have a low rate of periprocedural morbidity and mortality. One-year patency is lower than historically observed for CFA endarterectomy. Stent use is associated with reinterventions and amputation. Longer-term analysis is needed to better assess durability.


Assuntos
Endarterectomia , Procedimentos Endovasculares , Artéria Femoral , Doença Arterial Periférica/terapia , Melhoria de Qualidade , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde , Idoso , Amputação Cirúrgica , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Endarterectomia/efeitos adversos , Endarterectomia/mortalidade , Endarterectomia/normas , Procedimentos Endovasculares/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Endovasculares/instrumentação , Procedimentos Endovasculares/mortalidade , Procedimentos Endovasculares/normas , Feminino , Artéria Femoral/diagnóstico por imagem , Artéria Femoral/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Salvamento de Membro , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , América do Norte , Doença Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico por imagem , Doença Arterial Periférica/mortalidade , Doença Arterial Periférica/fisiopatologia , Melhoria de Qualidade/normas , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde/normas , Retratamento , Fatores de Risco , Stents , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Grau de Desobstrução Vascular
6.
Am Surg ; 81(5): 527-31, 2015 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25975341

RESUMO

Central venous catheterization (CVC) is often necessary during initial trauma resuscitations, but may cause complications including catheter-related blood stream infection (CRBSI), deep venous thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary emboli (PE), arterial injury, or pneumothoraces. Our primary objective compared subclavian versus femoral CVC complications during initial trauma resuscitations. A retrospective review (2010-2011) at an urban, Level-I Trauma Center reviewed CVCs during initial trauma resuscitations. Demographics, clinical characteristics, and complications including: CRBSIs, DVTs, arterial injuries, pneumothoraces, and PEs were analyzed. Fisher's exact test and Student's t test were used; P ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Overall, 504 CVCs were placed (subclavian, n = 259; femoral, n = 245). No difference in age (47 ± 22 vs 45 ± 23 years) or body mass index (28 ± 6 vs 29 ± 16 kg/m(2)) was detected (P > 0.05) in subclavian vs femoral CVC, but subclavian CVCs had more blunt injuries (81% vs 69%), greater systolic blood pressure (95 ± 55 vs 83 ± 43 mmHg), greater Glasgow Coma Scale (10 ± 5 vs 9 ± 5), and less introducers (49% vs 73%) than femoral CVCs (all P < 0.05). Catheter related arterial injuries, PEs, and CRBSIs were similar in subclavian and femoral groups (3% vs 2%, 0% vs 1%, and 3% vs 3%; all P > 0.05). Catheter-related DVTs occurred in 2 per cent of subclavian and 9 per cent of femoral CVCs (P < 0.001). There was a 3 per cent occurrence of pneumothorax in the subclavian CVC population. In conclusion, both subclavian and femoral CVCs caused significant complications. Subclavian catheter-related pneumothoraces occurred more commonly and femoral CRBSIs less commonly than expected compared with prior literature in nonemergent scenarios. This suggests that femoral CVC may be safer than subclavian CVC during initial trauma resuscitations.


Assuntos
Cateterismo Venoso Central/efeitos adversos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/métodos , Tratamento de Emergência , Veia Femoral , Ressuscitação , Veia Subclávia , Ferimentos e Lesões/terapia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...