Axillary recurrence after a tumour-negative sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Sentinel node biopsy became the standard of care before consensus on the technique was reached and without randomized studies having shown a similar or decreased axillary recurrence rate. The purpose of this study was to evaluate studies reporting on patients with a negative sentinel node biopsy. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature for studies concerning clinically node-negative breast cancer patients with a tumour-negative sentinel node biopsy and no subsequent axillary node dissection. The axillary recurrence rate was determined, as well as the sensitivity of the sentinel node procedure and the differences in lymphatic mapping techniques. RESULTS: Forty-eight studies concerning 14 959 sentinel node-negative breast cancer patients followed for a median of 34 months were selected. Sixty-seven patients developed an axillary recurrence, resulting in a recurrence rate of 0.3%. The sensitivity of the sentinel node biopsy was 100%. Uni- and multivariable variable analyses showed that the lowest recurrence rates were reported in studies performed in cancer centres, in studies that described the use of (99m)Tc-sulphur colloid, and also when investigators used the superficial injection technique or evaluated the harvested sentinel nodes with haematoxylin-eosin and immunohistochemistry staining (p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In this systematic literature review, the axillary recurrence rate in sentinel node-negative patients is 0.3%, which is well within the desired range. The median sensitivity of the procedure appears to be as high as 100%. The recurrence rate is influenced by the differences in the lymphatic mapping technique.

Lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy in Merkel's cell carcinoma.

AIM: The purpose of this study was to determine the predictive value of lymphatic mapping with selective lymphadenectomy in patients with Merkel's cell carcinoma. METHODS: Eight patients with biopsy proven Merkel's cell carcinoma underwent sentinel node biopsy. Lymphoscintigraphy was performed the day before surgery following intradermal injection of 74-111MBq of 99mTc-nanocolloid divided into four doses around the biopsy scar. Dynamic and static images were obtained. RESULTS: At least one sentinel node was visualized in all patients. The sentinel node was intra-operatively identified with the aid of a hand-held gamma probe in all cases and patent blue dye in six out of eight cases. During surgery, all sentinel nodes were successfully harvested. Metastatic cell deposits were subsequently identified in three patients (37.5%) and they underwent regional lymphadenectomy. No additional involved lymph nodes were identified. No recurrence has been reported in a median follow-up of 4.6 years (range: 8 months-10 years). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, sentinel node biopsy in patients with Merkel's cell carcinoma appears to be a reliable staging technique.

The sentinel node biopsy in patients with breast cancer; many controversies remain.

The sentinel node procedure has increasingly been used as a diagnostic tool for staging breast cancer. Although many institutes have embraced this procedure, many issues concerning the indications and the technique itself remain unsolved. In this review, several aspects regarding these controversies are discussed from the perspective of The Netherlands Cancer Institute. These include the definitions used to identify the sentinel node, the indications and contraindications for this procedure and the injection site of the tracer and blue dye. What are the clinical implications of a micro-metastasis in the sentinel node? What is the best treatment for patients with an involved axillary node? Should non-axillary sentinel nodes be pursued, and if so, what are the implications for further management of these patients? Finally, the current TNM system is discussed in perspective of the evolving sentinel node procedure. Although many questions remain to be solved, the regional recurrence rates are low when axillary clearance is omitted because of a tumor-free sentinel node.