Validation of a web-based version of the asthma control test and childhood asthma control test.

RATIONALE: Recent guidelines focus on adjusting asthma treatment to the level of asthma control. The availability of a web-based asthma control questionnaire offers the possibility to assess asthma control without the need of outpatient clinic visits. The aim of this study was to evaluate the agreement between web-based and paper-based versions of the Asthma Control Test (ACT) and Childhood Asthma Control Test (C-ACT), short-term reproducibility and satisfaction with both versions. METHODS: One hundred seventy-three children with stable asthma and a normal lung function were randomized to fill in a web-based or paper-based version of the C-ACT (4-11 years) or ACT (12-18 years). According to a cross-over design, they completed the opposite version after 1 week. Reproducibility was evaluated by repeating the 2nd version (web- or paper-based) 7 days later. RESULTS: Eighty-eight children filled in the C-ACT, 68 children filled in the ACT. Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) for web-based versus paper-based C-ACT was 0.81 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.72-0.87). For ACT this was 0.84 (95% CI 0.76-0.90). For web-based and paper-based C-ACT the reproducibility ICC was 0.82 (95% CI 0.67-0.90) and 0.75 (95% CI 0.59-0.85), respectively. The reproducibility ICC of the ACT for web- and paper-based versions was 0.93 (95% CI 0.87-0.97) and 0.77 (95% CI 0.59-0.88), respectively. Eighty-six percent of patients preferred the web-based version. CONCLUSION: The web-based version of the C-ACT and ACT is reproducible and comparable with the paper-based version in assessing asthma control. Most children and their parents prefer the web-based version.

Comparing Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) criteria with the Childhood Asthma Control Test (C-ACT) and Asthma Control Test (ACT).

Several tools are useful in detecting uncontrolled asthma in children. The aim of this study was to compare Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guidelines with the Childhood Asthma Control Test (C-ACT) and the Asthma Control Test (ACT) in detecting uncontrolled asthma in children. 145 children with asthma filled in a web-based daily diary card for 4 weeks on symptoms, use of rescue medication and limitations of activities, followed by either the C-ACT or ACT. For predicting uncontrolled asthma, score cut-off points of 19 were used for C-ACT and ACT. According to GINA guidelines, asthma was uncontrolled in 71 (51%) children and completely controlled in 19 (14%) children. The area under the curve in the receiver operating characteristic curves for C-ACT and ACT versus GINA guidelines were 0.89 and 0.92, respectively. Cut-off points of 19 for C-ACT and ACT resulted in a sensitivity of 33% and 66% in predicting uncontrolled asthma, respectively. C-ACT and ACT correlate well with GINA criteria in predicting uncontrolled asthma, but commonly used cut-off points for C-ACT and ACT seem to underestimate the proportion of children with uncontrolled asthma as defined by GINA.

Residential exposure to mould and dampness is associated with adverse respiratory health.

BACKGROUND: Indoor exposure to mould and dampness is frequently associated with asthma symptoms with and without lung function changes. However, the mechanisms contributing to this threat to respiratory health are only partly understood. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the contribution of recent exposure to mould and dampness in the living room or bedroom to respiratory health in a general practice-based cohort of 526 asthmatic children. METHODS: Parents were questioned about home characteristics, including moulds and dampness. The level of asthma control was evaluated in their participating children by means of asthma symptoms, peak expiratory flow (PEF) variability, severity of airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR), and medication usage. RESULTS: Children exposed to indoor moulds and dampness more often had severe AHR compared with non-exposed (42% vs. 16%; P< or =0.001). They also showed an increased PEF variability (11.3% vs. 8.4%; P=0.03) and, however, not significant, more frequent asthma symptoms. The use of controller medication was not significantly different between exposed and non-exposed children. After adjustment for gender, age, smoking, exposure to parental smoking, parental education, pet ownership, presence of inhalant allergy, use of controller medication, health care center, and season of study assessment, the odds ratio for severe AHR in exposed children was 3.95 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.82-8.57]. CONCLUSION: We found a consistent association between reported moulds and dampness in the living room or the child's bedroom and an increased risk for severe AHR in a general practice-based cohort of asthmatic children, even after adjustment for gender, presence of inhalant allergy, and use of controller medication.

Severe airway hyperresponsiveness was not predictable with the use of current tools in asthmatic children in general practice.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether moderate to severe airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) could be suspected with the use of routinely available clinical and environmental information. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Cross-sectional study of asthma in 526 asthmatics aged 7-17 years and treated in general practice. RESULTS: Moderate to severe AHR was present in 48% (n=253) of the participants. The presence of inhalation allergy, nocturnal symptoms, and usage of beta2-mimetics were significantly associated with moderate to severe AHR. If all three factors were present, the probability of the presence of moderate to severe and severe AHR was 76% and 36%, respectively. If all three were absent, the probability decreased to 11% and 5%, respectively. In 319 subjects (64%) AHR could not be adequately predicted with routinely available information. CONCLUSION: Moderate and severe AHR could not be suspected with the use of routinely available clinical and environmental information in the majority of children. Except for a subgroup of children, our models were not helpful in deciding in which child an inhaled corticosteroid should be started or whether the dose should be increased or decreased. We recommend measuring the severity of AHR in these children by means of an inhalation challenge test.

Validation of a single concentration methacholine inhalation provocation test (SCIPT) in children.

A new method to assess bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) using a single concentration methacholine has already been validated in adults with asthma. Because the geometrical dimensions of the airways in children are different, the results from studies in adults cannot be extrapolated to children. In this study, we validated the single concentration methacholine inhalation provocation test (SCIPT) in children. Twenty-two children performed three methacholine inhalation challenge tests in random order. Two challenges were performed according to the SCIPT: doubling doses (0.03-1.8 mg; maximal cumulated dose 3.6 mg) were administered with an Aerosol Provocation System (Masterscope, Jaeger). The third challenge was performed according to a standard dosimeter method (SDM): doubling doses (0.002-1.8 mg; maximal cumulative dose 3.5 mg) were administered with a DeVillbiss 646 nebulizer. The degree of BHR is expressed as a PD20. A difference of < 1.5 dose step was assumed to be due to intraindividual variation. We found an intraclass correlation of 0.91 between both tests according to the SCIPT and of 0.80 between the SCIPT and SDM. We found, according to the method of Bland and Altman, good agreement when comparing these two challenge tests. The single concentration inhalation provocation test is reproducible and shows good agreement with a standard dosimeter method to test bronchial responsiveness in children.

Salmeterol/fluticasone propionate (50/100 microg) in combination in a Diskus inhaler (Seretide) is effective and safe in children with asthma.

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety in children of salmeterol (50 microg twice daily) plus fluticasone propionate (100 microg twice daily) when delivered together via a single Diskus inhaler (Seretide; combination therapy) or concurrently using two separate Diskus inhalers (concurrent therapy). In a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group study, 257 children with reversible airways obstruction who remained symptomatic on inhaled corticosteroids (200-500 microg daily) alone were randomized to combination or concurrent therapy for 12 weeks. Efficacy was assessed by measuring daily peak expiratory flow (PEF), symptom scores, and rescue salbutamol use. In addition, lung function tests were performed at each clinic visit. Safety assessments included monitoring of adverse events and morning serum cortisol concentrations. The primary efficacy parameter (mean morning PEF) increased during treatment in both groups; adjusted mean changes were 33 and 28 L/min for the combination and concurrent therapies, respectively. The 90% confidence interval for the difference in mean morning PEF between treatment groups was within the +15 L/min criterion for clinical equivalence. Similarly, there were improvements in pulmonary function, symptom score, and rescue salbutamol use during treatment in both groups, with no significant differences between the combination and concurrent therapy groups for any of these secondary efficacy parameters. Both treatment regimens were well-tolerated and had comparable adverse event profiles. Mean morning serum cortisol levels increased similarly in both groups during the study. In conclusion, salmeterol and fluticasone propionate therapy given as a new combination product is as safe and effective in children with asthma as the same drugs given concurrently via separate inhalers.

Nedocromil sodium inhibits the early and late asthmatic response to exercise.

A double-blind, crossover study was carried out to investigate the effect of nedocromil sodium on the dual asthmatic response to exercise challenge. Nineteen patients with a late response to bicycle exercise were randomly treated on two study days with 4 mg nedocromil sodium or a matched placebo aerosol, 30 min before commencing exercise. Peak flow was measured before exercise, at intervals up to 60 min after exercise, then hourly for up to 13 h. In 12 of the 19 patients an early reaction to exercise occurred. In 8 of these 12 patients the early reaction could be inhibited by nedocromil sodium (p less than 0.01) although in half of these patients placebo was also shown to be protective. In the case of the late reaction after exercise challenge, 4-13 h after exercise challenge, nine patients were clearly protected by pretreatment with nedocromil sodium (p less than 0.01) when the fall in peak expiratory flow rate was related to the pre-exercise baseline, four patients showed an equal protective effect of placebo and nedocromil sodium, whilst the others were not protected. When the late asthmatic response (fall in peak expiratory flow rate) after exercise challenge was related to control diurnal peak flow values, the number of responses was reduced; the protective effect of nedocromil sodium remained.

IgG subclasses in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from patients with asthma.

We have measured Immunoglobulin G (IgG) subclasses in serum and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) from 12 non-smoking patients with stable asthma and 9 non-smoking healthy volunteers to obtain information on their possible role in local immunological reactions. The quotients (concentration of IgG subclass in BALF)/(concentration of IgG subclass in serum) were calculated. In controls QIgG3 were lower than QIgG1, QIgG2 and QIgG4. The IgG subclasses in BALF and epithelial lining fluid (ELF) from patients with asthma were significantly higher than in controls, mainly due to increased leakage from the blood. Again QIgG3 were lower than Q of other subclasses. In the analysis of local production of IgG, albumin or ceruloplasmin was used as reference protein. Several patients showed a local production or a preferential accumulation of one or more IgG subclasses. We conclude that in healthy persons the IgG subclasses in ELF originate from the systemic circulation by passive permeation. In patients with asthma, the permeability of the respiratory membrane may be increased resulting in increased concentrations of subclasses in lung-lining fluid. In some patients with asthma, an additional local production of IgG subclasses occurs.

Real and pseudo late asthmatic reactions after submaximal exercise challenge in patients with bronchial asthma. A new definition for late asthmatic responses after exercise challenge.

The late asthmatic reaction after exercise challenge remains a controversial issue. In this study, 21 patients recorded peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) on two control days without performing exercise. There was no difference between both control days when PEFR at 1 h was compared with baseline PEFR and when PEFR at 4 to 13 hours was compared with baseline PEFR. After analyzing variation coefficients of baseline PEFR on a control day and exercise day, PEFR was not allowed to differ more than 15.3 percent in the same patient when comparing exercise day and control day for the late fall in PEFR in the study. In 17 of 81 patients, a late asthmatic reaction after exercise challenge was present when PEFR fall was greater than or equal to 20 percent compared with baseline PEFR value. In eight of the 17 patients, a real late asthmatic reaction to exercise challenge was present with a PEFR fall greater than or equal to 20 percent on at least three successive time points and who had a PEFR fall greater than or equal to 20 percent compared with corresponding clocktime on a control day. The late asthmatic reaction to exercise challenge is characterized not as a nonspecific epiphenomenon, but as a fall in PEFR of greater than or equal to 20 percent compared with baseline PEFR value and with corresponding clocktime on a control day on at least three successive time points. Graphic illustration of airway responses following exercises may facilitate the detection of a late asthmatic response.

Immediate and late asthmatic responses induced by exercise in patients with reversible airflow limitation.

The existence and prevalence of late asthmatic responses to exercise in patients is uncertain. We investigated whether the late falls of peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) after exercise challenge were still significant after comparison with the corresponding clocktime PEFR on a control day. We examined 86 patients with reversible airflow limitation, 79 with asthma and 7 with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), all under regular treatment with bronchodilators and/or anti-inflammatory agents. Patients were randomized for a control day and an exercise day and PEFR was recorded hourly. On the exercise day, each patient underwent an 8 minute bicycle ride at 90% of predicted heart-rate. An early and a late asthmatic response to exercise were considered to occur when PEFR decreased by 10% or more on the exercise day compared to the corresponding clocktime PEFR on the control day. Thirty-three patients (38%) had a 10% or greater fall of PEFR at 4 to 13 hours after exercise when PEFR was compared with the corresponding clocktime on a control day. Seven (8%) had an isolated late asthmatic response, and 26 (30%) had a dual asthmatic response. We conclude that true late asthmatic responses develop after exercise in a significant number of patients with well controlled reversible airflow limitation.