Structural allograft impaction enables fast rehabilitation in opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy: a consecutive case series with one year follow-up.

PURPOSE: Painful and slow recovery are the presumed disadvantages after opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTO) and play a role in favouring arthroplasty as treatment for moderate isolated medial knee arthritis. The primary study objective was to investigate the effect of press-fit structural impacted bone allograft with locking plate fixation on early ambulation, postoperative pain levels, and resumption of daily-life activities in opening-wedge HTO. METHODS: A prospective consecutive opening-wedge HTO case series was conducted, including 103 patients with final follow-up at 1 year. Weight-bearing was allowed from the day after surgery "as tolerated" by the patient. Clinical assessment included the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and Lysholm score. Additionally, the Knee Society Score (KSS) was assessed during consultation at 1, 3, and 12 months postoperatively with special attention for clinical anchor questions. Required sample size was calculated and a linear mixed-effect model was used for repeated measures over time of the clinical scores. RESULTS: The NRS decreased by 1.5 at 1 month (p < 0.01) and 2.1 at 3 months (p < 0.01), while KOOS pain significantly improved with 19.2 (p < 0.01) by this time compared to baseline. Under reduced pain levels, 98% were able to walk > 500 m without support, while all patients were able to climb up and down the stairs 3 months postoperatively. CONCLUSION: The study strongly supports the initial hypothesis that applying structural triangular bone allograft in HTO leads to low postoperative pain levels, early ambulation, and excellent short-term clinical outcomes. Study results have the potential to alter the general perception about HTO being a painful procedure with painstakingly slow recovery and consequently encourage the consideration of HTO as a highly valuable joint-preserving option, while treating unicompartmental knee arthritis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV (case series).

Treatment of severe glenoid deficiencies in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: the Glenius Glenoid Reconstruction System experience.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of glenoid bone deficiencies in primary or revision total shoulder arthroplasty is challenging. This retrospective study evaluated the short-term clinical and radiologic results of a new custom-made patient-specific glenoid implant. METHODS: We treated 10 patients with severe glenoid deficiencies with the Glenius Glenoid Reconstruction System (Materialise NV, Leuven, Belgium). Outcome data included a patient-derived Constant-Murley score, a visual analog score (VAS), a satisfaction score, the 11-item version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score, and the Simple Shoulder Test. We compared the postoperative position of the implant with the preoperative planned position on computed tomography scans. RESULTS: At an average follow-up period of 30.5 months, the mean patient-derived Constant-Murley score was 41.3 ± 17.5 points (range, 18-76 points) with a visual analog scale of 3.3 ± 2.5 points (range, 0-7 points). The mean 11-item version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score was 35.8 ± 18.4 (range, 2-71), and the mean Simple Shoulder Test was 47.5% ± 25.3% (range, 8%-92%). Eight patients reported the result as better (n = 3) or much better (n = 5). One patient had an elongation of the brachial plexus, and 1 patient had a period of instability. The average preoperative glenoid defect size was 9 ± 4 cm3 (range, 1-14 cm3). The mean deviation between the preoperative planned and the postoperative version and inclination was 6° ± 4° (range 1°-16°) and 4° ± 4° (range 0°-11°), respectively. CONCLUSION: Early results of the Glenius Glenoid Reconstruction System are encouraging. Adequate pain relief, a reasonable functionality, and good patient satisfaction can be obtained in these difficult cases. Further follow-up will determine the bony ingrowth and subsequent longevity of this patient-specific glenoid component.

Arthroscopic bone block augmentation of the anterior glenoid through the rotator interval: a cadaveric feasibility study.

HYPOTHESIS: Arthroscopic augmentation of the anterior glenoid using a free bone graft through the rotator interval is possible without compromising the fixation and position of the graft MATERIAL AND METHODS: In 7 cadavers arthroscopic augmentation of the anterior glenoid was performed. A preshaped, free graft was introduced and fixated with 1 central screw without desinsertion or split of the subscapularis tendon. Postoperatively, the orientation and position of the screw and position of the graft in the vertical and horizontal plane were analyzed on computer tomography (CT) scan. Macroscopic dissection was performed to assess damage to the conjoined and subscapularis tendon and surrounding neurovascular structures and to verify the position of the graft. RESULTS: Postoperative CT scans showed no intra-articular perforation of the screw. The mean inclination angle in the axial plane was 21,2° (range, 9-48°). Postoperative dissection showed no damage to surrounding neurovascular structures. Fraying occurred at the lateral border of the conjoined tendon in 3 specimens, at the upper border of the subscapularis in 5 cases, but no tears were noted. In the vertical plane, the augmentation block was correctly (subequatorial) positioned in 5 cases; 2 blocks were at the level of the equator. In the horizontal plane, the augmentation block was flush with the articular surface in 5 cases and too medial in 2 cases (<5 mm). CONCLUSION: This study showed that it is technically possible to perform a bone block procedure arthroscopically through the rotator interval without compromising the position and fixation of the graft and fixation screw.