Variable cartilage degradation in mice with diet-induced metabolic dysfunction: food for thought.

OBJECTIVE: Human cohort studies have demonstrated a role for systemic metabolic dysfunction in osteoarthritis (OA) pathogenesis in obese patients. To explore the mechanisms underlying this metabolic phenotype of OA, we examined cartilage degradation in the knees of mice from different genetic backgrounds in which a metabolic phenotype was established by various dietary approaches. DESIGN: Wild-type C57BL/6J mice and genetically modified mice (hCRP, LDLr-/-. Leiden and ApoE*3Leiden.CETP mice) based on C57BL/6J background were used to investigate the contribution of inflammation and altered lipoprotein handling on diet-induced cartilage degradation. High-caloric diets of different macronutrient composition (i.e., high-carbohydrate or high-fat) were given in regimens of varying duration to induce a metabolic phenotype with aggravated cartilage degradation relative to controls. RESULTS: Metabolic phenotypes were confirmed in all studies as mice developed obesity, hypercholesteremia, glucose intolerance and/or insulin resistance. Aggravated cartilage degradation was only observed in two out of the twelve experimental setups, specifically in long-term studies in male hCRP and female ApoE*3Leiden.CETP mice. C57BL/6J and LDLr-/-. Leiden mice did not develop HFD-induced OA under the conditions studied. Osteophyte formation and synovitis scores showed variable results between studies, but also between strains and gender. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term feeding of high-caloric diets consistently induced a metabolic phenotype in various C57BL/6J (-based) mouse strains. In contrast, the induction of articular cartilage degradation proved variable, which suggests that an additional trigger might be necessary to accelerate diet-induced OA progression. Gender and genetic modifications that result in a humanized pro-inflammatory state (human CRP) or lipoprotein metabolism (human-E3L.CETP) were identified as important contributing factors.

APOE*3Leiden.CETP transgenic mice as model for pharmaceutical treatment of the metabolic syndrome.

AIMS: This study aimed to investigate systematically (i) the appropriate dietary conditions to induce the features of the MetS in APOE*3Leiden.humanCholesteryl Ester Transfer Protein (E3L.CETP) mice and (ii) whether the response of this model to different antidiabetic and hypolipidemic drugs is similar as in humans. METHODS: Male obese, IR and dyslipidemic E3L.CETP mice were treated with antidiabetic drugs rosiglitazone, liraglutide or an experimental 11ß-hydroxysteroid-dehydrogenase-1 (HSD-1) inhibitor, or with hypolipidemic drugs atorvastatin, fenofibrate or niacin for 4-6 weeks. The effects on bw, IR and plasma and liver lipids were assessed. RESULTS: Rosiglitazone, liraglutide and HSD-1 inhibitor significantly decreased glucose and insulin levels or IR. Liraglutide and HSD-1 inhibitor also decreased bw. Atorvastatin, fenofibrate and niacin improved the dyslipidemia and fenofibrate and niacin increased high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol. In addition, hepatic triglycerides were significantly decreased by treatment with rosiglitazone and liraglutide, while hepatic cholesterol esters were significantly decreased by rosiglitazone and atorvastatin. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the E3L.CETP mouse is a promising novel translational model to investigate the effects of new drugs, alone or in combination, that affect IR, diabetic dyslipidemia and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD).

Leptin deficiency per se dictates body composition and insulin action in ob/ob mice.

Obese humans are often insulin- and leptin resistant. Since leptin can affect glucose metabolism, it is conceivable that a lack of leptin signal transduction contributes to insulin resistance. It remains unclear whether leptin affects glucose metabolism via peripheral and/or central mechanistic routes. In the present study, we aimed: (i) to determine the relative contributions of lack of leptin signal transduction and adiposity to insulin resistance and (ii) to establish the impact of central leptin action on glucose metabolism. To address the first point, ob/ob mice were subjected to severe calorie restriction, so that their body weight became similar to that of wild-type mice. Insulin sensitivity was measured in obese ob/ob, lean (food restricted) ob/ob and lean, weight-matched wild-type mice. To address the second point, leptin (or vehicle) was i.c.v. infused to the lateral cerebral ventricle of ob/ob mice and insulin sensitivity was determined. Hyperinsulinaemic euglyceamic clamps were used to quantify insulin sensitivity. Food restriction barely affected body composition, although it profoundly curtailed body weight. Insulin suppressed hepatic glucose production (HGP) to a greater extent in lean ob/ob than in obese ob/ob mice, but its impact remained considerably less than in wild-type mice (% suppression: 11.8 +/- 8.9 versus 1.3 +/- 1.1 versus 56.6 +/- 13.0%/nmol, for lean, obese ob/ob and wild-type mice, respectively; P < 0.05). The insulin-mediated glucose disposal (GD) of lean ob/ob mice was also in between that of obese ob/ob and wild-type mice (37.5 +/- 21.4 versus 25.1 +/- 14.6 versus 59.6 +/- 17.3 mumol/min/kg/nmol of insulin, respectively; P < 0.05 wild-type versus obese ob/ob mice). Leptin infusion acutely enhanced both hepatic insulin sensitivity (insulin-induced inhibition of HGP) and insulin-mediated GD (9.1 +/- 2.4 versus 5.0 +/- 2.7%/nmol of insulin, and 25.6 +/- 5.6 versus 13.6 +/- 4.8 mumol/min/kg/nmol of insulin, respectively; P < 0.05 for both comparisons) in ob/ob mice. Both a lack of leptin signals and adiposity may contribute to insulin resistance in obese individuals. Diminution of central leptin signalling can critically affect glucose metabolism in these individuals.

Gut-brain axis: regulation of glucose metabolism.

Obesity and type II diabetes mellitus have reached epidemic proportions. From this perspective, knowledge about the regulation of satiety and food intake is more important than ever. The gut releases several peptides upon feeding, which affect hypothalamic pathways involved in the regulation of satiety and metabolism. Within the hypothalamus, there are complex interactions between many nuclei of which the arcuate nucleus is considered as one of the most important hypothalamic centres that regulates food intake. The neuropeptides, which are present in the hypothalamus and are involved in regulating food intake, also play a key role in regulating glucose metabolism and energy expenditure. In synchrony with the effects of those neuropeptides, gastrointestinal hormones also affect glucose metabolism and energy expenditure. In this review, the effects of the gastrointestinal hormones ghrelin, cholecystokinin, peptide YY, glucagon-like peptide, oxyntomodulin and gastric inhibitory polypeptide on glucose and energy metabolism are reviewed. These gut hormones affect glucose metabolism at different levels: by altering food intake and body weight, and thereby insulin sensitivity; by affecting gastric delay and gut motility, and thereby meal-related fluctuations in glucose levels; by affecting insulin secretion, and thereby plasma glucose levels, and by affecting tissue specific insulin sensitivity of glucose metabolism. These observations point to the notion of a major role of the gut-brain axis in the integrative physiology of whole body fuel metabolism.

Ghrelin differentially affects hepatic and peripheral insulin sensitivity in mice.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: This study was conducted to evaluate the effects of ghrelin on insulin's capacity to suppress endogenous glucose production and promote glucose disposal in mice. To establish whether the growth hormone secretagogue (GHS) receptor can mediate the putative effect of ghrelin on the action of insulin, we also determined the metabolic effects of growth hormone releasing peptide 6 (GHRP-6), a specific GHS receptor agonist. In addition, we explored the biological significance of des-ghrelin (unacylated ghrelin) in this experimental context. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Vehicle (n=8), ghrelin (n=9), GHRP-6 (n=9), des-ghrelin (n=8) or a combination of des-ghrelin and ghrelin (n=7) were infused i.v. for 3 h. Simultaneously, endogenous glucose production and glucose disposal were measured by (14)C-glucose dilution during a hyperinsulinaemic-euglycaemic clamp. Tissue-specific glucose uptake in muscle and adipose tissue was measured using (3)H-2-deoxyglucose. RESULTS: During hyperinsulinaemia, glucose disposal was 31% higher in mice treated with ghrelin than in those treated with vehicle (77+/-16 and 59+/-8 micromol kg(-1) h(-1), respectively, p<0.05). This was in accordance with enhanced 2-deoxyglucose uptake in muscle in ghrelin-treated animals. In contrast, endogenous glucose production was less effectively suppressed by insulin during ghrelin infusion (46+/-22 vs 71+/-11% in controls, p<0.05). GHRP-6 did not affect insulin action. Des-ghrelin hampered insulin's capacity to inhibit endogenous glucose production, whereas it did not affect glucose disposal. The restraining effects of des-ghrelin and ghrelin on hepatic insulin action were abolished by simultaneous administration of both peptides. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: Ghrelin hampers insulin's capacity to suppress endogenous glucose production, whereas it reinforces the action of insulin on glucose disposal, independently of food intake and body weight. These metabolic effects are unlikely to be mediated by the GHS receptor. Furthermore, simultaneous administration of des-ghrelin abolishes the inhibitory effect of ghrelin on hepatic insulin action.

Intracerebroventricular administration of melanotan II increases insulin sensitivity of glucose disposal in mice.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: The present study was conducted to evaluate the effects of central administration of melanotan II (MTII), a melanocortin-3/4 receptor agonist, on hepatic and whole-body insulin sensitivity, independent of food intake and body weight. METHODS: Over a period of 24 h, 225 ng of MTII was injected in three aliquots into the left lateral ventricle of male C57Bl/6 mice. The animals had no access to food. The control group received three injections of distilled water. Whole-body and hepatic insulin sensitivity were measured by hyperinsulinaemic-euglycaemic clamp in combination with [(3)H]glucose infusion. Glut4 mRNA expression was measured in skeletal muscle. RESULTS: Plasma glucose and insulin concentrations under basal and hyperinsulinaemic conditions were similar in MTII- and placebo-treated mice. Endogenous glucose production (EGP) and glucose disposal in the basal state were significantly higher in MTII-treated mice than in the control group (71+/-22 vs 43+/-12 micromol.min(-1).kg(-1), p<0.01). During hyperinsulinaemia, glucose disposal was significantly higher in MTII-treated mice (151+/-20 vs 108+/-20 micromol.min(-1).kg(-1), p<0.01). In contrast, the inhibitory effect of insulin on EGP was not affected by MTII (relative decrease in EGP: 45+/-27 vs 50+/-20%). Glut4 mRNA expression in skeletal muscle was significantly increased in MTII-treated mice (307+/-94 vs 100+/-56%, p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: Intracerebroventricular administration of MTII acutely increases insulin-mediated glucose disposal but does not affect the capacity of insulin to suppress EGP in C57Bl/6 mice. These data indicate that central stimulation of melanocortin-3/4 receptors modulates insulin sensitivity in a tissue-specific manner, independent of its well-known impact on feeding and body weight.