Performance evaluation of an LED flatbed scanner for triple channel film dosimetry with EBT3 and EBT-XD film.

We investigate the properties of a light emitting diode (LED) flatbed scanner for use with EBT3 and EBT-XD film types in a clinical radiochromic film (RCF) dosimetry program with modern treatment techniques. The flatbed scanner was characterised in terms of lateral and longitudinal response, X-Y scaling integrity, scanning reproducibility, scanner warm up dependence and film orientation dependence. The preferred lateral response artefact (LRA) corrections are investigated for the LED light source. Supporting evidence is provided regarding the dose independent nature of the corrections while also providing results suggesting a potential film type independence. Results from 2D gamma analysis of four patient treatments were compared between the new 12000XL and existing 10000XL model. Lastly, a dose uncertainty analysis was performed for the film-scanner system combination. It may be concluded that the lateral response variation requires correction while the longitudinal response variation is insignificant. The linear scaling in the lateral and longitudinal directions are within 0.5% and the scanner reproducibility is stable. Scanner warm up dependence no longer exists, and effort should be made to maintain all film orientation in a study set within 15°. The LRA corrections are as reported substantially dose independent and there is evidence to support film type independence. Comparative gamma analysis of patient specific dose maps between the EPSON 10000XL (xenon fluorescent lamp) and 12000XL (LED) scanners showed that results are indistinguishable for both film types across the two scanner models when the necessary corrections are applied. Dose uncertainty is in agreement with the literature and can be kept below 3% with necessary corrections applied.

Commissioning measurements on an Elekta Unity MR-Linac.

Magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy technology is relatively new and commissioning publications, quality assurance (QA) protocols and commercial products are limited. This work provides guidance for implementation measurements that may be performed on the Elekta Unity MR-Linac (Elekta, Stockholm, Sweden). Adaptations of vendor supplied phantoms facilitated determination of gantry angle accuracy and linac isocentre, whereas in-house developed phantoms were used for end-to-end testing and anterior coil attenuation measurements. Third-party devices were used for measuring beam quality, reference dosimetry and during treatment plan commissioning; however, due to several challenges, variations on standard techniques were required. Gantry angle accuracy was within 0.1°, confirmed with pixel intensity profiles, and MV isocentre diameter was < 0.5 mm. Anterior coil attenuation was approximately 0.6%. Beam quality as determined by TPR20,10 was 0.705 ± 0.001, in agreement with treatment planning system (TPS) calculations, and gamma comparison against the TPS for a 22.0 × 22.0 cm2 field was above 95.0% (2.0%, 2.0 mm). Machine output was 1.000 ± 0.002 Gy per 100 MU, depth 5.0 cm. During treatment plan commissioning, sub-standard results indicated issues with machine behaviour. Once rectified, gamma comparisons were above 95.0% (2.0%, 2.0 mm). Centres which may not have access to specialized equipment can use in-house developed phantoms, or adapt those supplied by the vendor, to perform commissioning work and confirm operation of the MRL within published tolerances. The plan QA techniques used in this work can highlight issues with machine behaviour when appropriate gamma criteria are set.

An alternative to the use of lead for patient treatment shielding in superficial radiotherapy.

Lead shielding is commonly used in the delivery of superficial radiotherapy albeit that the toxicity of this substance is of concern. The feasibility of using a non-toxic alternative, AttenuFlex™, is assessed using Xstrahl and Sensus treatment units. A series of lead and AttenuFlex™ circular cut outs and applicators were used with superficial beams (1.0-8.5 mm Al HVL) to measure percentage depth dose (PDD), output factors (OF) and surface dose correction factors (DCF). X-ray transmission for each material was determined for each beam quality. For these measurements an Advanced Markus chamber either embedded within a virtual water phantom (PDD, OF, transmission) or placed on the surface of the phantom with entrance window downstream (DCF), was used. The depth of the phantom is 10 cm for PDD and surface OF measurements. DCF(t) measurements were obtained with underlying lead or AttenuFlex™ at depth t = 0.1-10 cm. Additionally, using EBT3 film fluorescent surface doses, to non-target tissue, due to underlying lead or AttenuFlex™ were compared. PDDs and OFs for both materials were within ± 1%. Lead and AttenuFlex™ transmission differences were clinically acceptable, all transmission values were < 5% and non-target doses were comparable. The variation of DCF(t) for lead and AttenuFlex™ exhibit a minima for all beams. In the minima region energy and applicator dependent differences between DCF(lead) and DCF(AttenuFlex™) are observed. These differences do not preclude the use of AttenuFlex™ as an alternative to lead in superficial therapy.

PLA as a suitable 3D printing thermoplastic for use in external beam radiotherapy.

The purpose of this paper is to investigate the tissue equivalence and radiological properties of Polylactic Acid (PLA) to determine if this material is suitable for use as a 3D printing thermoplastic for radiotherapy applications. Profiles and percentage depth-dose measurements (PDDs) were analysed for photon and electron modalities with PLA samples (~ 1.25 g/cm3) to determine material dosimeteric characteristics. Beam profiles and PDDs from treatment planning system (TPS) simulations, water tank measurements and radiochromic film measurements were compared. Tissue equivalence was determined through CT scanning several PLA samples and measuring the Hounsfield units (HUs) to determine relative electron density (RED), mass density and mass attenuation, these results were compared to several commercial tissue phantoms with varying properties. Geometric accuracy was tested by comparing digitally planned dimensions to physical and CT image measurements. Finally, resistance to radiation damage was tested by exposing PLA samples to several thousand monitor units (MUs) over several weeks and inspecting for damage. It was determined that PLA is a safe and effective thermoplastic for use as a patient specific bolus for both electron and photon treatment modalities. The material properties have been characterised and can be accurately modelled in the MONACO TPS.